Help support TMP


"Questions raised about Afghanistan’s Mobile Strike Force..." Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

War Games Rules: Infantry Actions


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Featured Workbench Article

Anyone Seen My Puck?

Lonewolf dcc Fezian returns to show us how he painted Hasslefree's Jess zombie-fighter.


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


735 hits since 30 Jul 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0130 Jul 2014 3:38 p.m. PST

…Vehicle fleet.

"When the Defense Department began shipping a a new fleet of massive armored vehicles to Afghanistan in 2011, U.S. officials billed them as the Afghan National Army's solution for rapidly sending troops into dangerous situations to reinforce fellow soldiers. The Mobile Strike Force Vehicles are based on the aging M117 armored personnel carrier that has been used since Vietnam, but with beefed up armor to defend against rocket-propelled grenades and other threats.

Most of the 634 strike force vehicles built for the Afghan army are now in its hands, according to a new audit report released Tuesday by the U.S.'s top watchdog on Afghan reconstruction. But the long-term outlook for the $661.3 USD million fleet of vehicles in the fight against the Taliban remains in question, the report says, citing deterioration in the vehicles due to a lack of spare parts and the patchwork nature of maintenance training.

The report comes as the U.S. and other coalition countries continue to withdraw troops across the country, limiting their reach as their combat role in Afghanistan comes to an end. The U.S. withdrawal calls for about 9,800 American troops in Afghanistan by the end of this year, with an additional 4,000 troops from other coalition countries. That's down from a peak of more than 130,000 coalition troops in 2011.

The mobile strike vehicles were built by Textron Inc., of Providence, R.I. The report, by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction's (SIGAR) office, shows that Army officials reported that the company has performed well in providing the vehicles and the initial training to Afghan troops needed to use them. But Textron also is being paid as part of its contracts with the Defense Department to provide additional field training and maintenance, and it has not been able to do so because it is unable to reach the sites where the vehicles are kept, SIGAR found…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1130 Jul 2014 4:39 p.m. PST

Seems a bit daft to upgrade them for the Taliban, who will no doubt end up with them, shortly.

Probably best that they are deteriorating in the desert.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP31 Jul 2014 7:29 a.m. PST

Have my doubts at the ANA and ANP effectiveness, after the US/NATO leaves … much like what happened in Vietnam and what is going on in Iraq currently …

Zargon31 Jul 2014 9:36 a.m. PST

Habibs Scrap Metal Dealers.
Ello der What can Habib do for you today?

Wish the US gov would drop a $1 USD mil on me as quick as they are to those losers.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP31 Jul 2014 4:23 p.m. PST

Indeed …

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.