"30th Regt of Foot (Cambridgeshire)" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board Back to the Wargaming in the United Kingdom Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral Napoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase ArticleLooking for a way to mark explosions or fire?
Featured Profile ArticleDelayed by circumstances, the 2016 Christmas Project finally arrives!
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Sebastian Palmer | 29 Jul 2014 8:19 a.m. PST |
30th Regt of Foot (Cambridgeshire): AW Miniatures Napoleonics Hello all. This is a more or less duplicate posting of another thread I posted under 'painting' and 'napoleonic discussion'. But rather than crosspost, I thought posting it under another title might appeal to a potentially different set of interests… I hope that's okay? I've been trying out two things that are new departures for me: using Quickshade to bring out detail, and protecting my figs with lacquer. I've tried it all out on a unit I'm not too precious about, some 15mm AW miniatures British Peninsular troops (my main area currently is 6mm Russia 1812 Napoleonics). I've painted the figs as the 30th Regt of Foot, or Cambridgeshire, for a bit of fun, as that's my local town, and I'm toying with a scenario of a local sort that could involve them… Here's my favourite of the pics I've just posted on my blog:
The blog post (there are two actually) is here: link I'm a drummer myself, and was disappointed that there's no info in Franklin's British Napoleonic Uniforms on the drummer's outfits. So I did a kind of generic drummer look. Cheers Seb |
Louie N | 29 Jul 2014 9:18 a.m. PST |
They look good. The shade brings out the lines without masking the colors. Good work |
Sebastian Palmer | 31 Jul 2014 5:23 p.m. PST |
|
deephorse | 01 Aug 2014 6:35 a.m. PST |
That does seem to have worked well, and you've avoided the heavy spray-tan look on the faces (on the blog) that I've seen too often. Which tone did you use? |
Sebastian Palmer | 01 Aug 2014 12:24 p.m. PST |
Deephorse: Thank'ee… & I used the Dark tone |
Sebastian Palmer | 01 Aug 2014 12:47 p.m. PST |
Louie: it occurs to me, on re-reading your comment, that I should mention that the initial coat of Quickshade really did knock back, or 'mask', the colours a lot. The minis looked very dull indeed. I had to go back over the reds, greys, and various other little bits, to bring back some zing to them… |
deephorse | 01 Aug 2014 4:24 p.m. PST |
Right, I think I would have started with the lightest tone to see how it went. |
dibble | 01 Aug 2014 6:02 p.m. PST |
This is all I could find on the 30th Drummer link Paul :) |
Sebastian Palmer | 02 Aug 2014 6:53 a.m. PST |
Dibble: thanks for that. Luckily for me I did more or less exactly what's illustrated on that link you posted. Mind you, one wonders how they got that info, given that someone as obsessive as Franklin could find nothing. Deephorse: sorry for addressing you as Louie in my previous reply. I only have the dark tone. I bought it three or four years ago, and I can recall my reasoning at the time: with limited funds, I thought I'd go for a single wash that would hopefully suit all my needs. Having begun using it (finally), I feel I made the right choice. |
deephorse | 02 Aug 2014 8:44 a.m. PST |
That's OK Sebastian, I didn't realise that you had done so. It made sense as a reply to Louie too. |
|