Help support TMP


"The new Chinese-made J-20 fifth-generation stealth fighter" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Current Poll


984 hits since 24 Jul 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0124 Jul 2014 10:53 p.m. PST

"The J-20, China's first fifth-generation stealth fighter designed by Chengdu Aerospace Corporation, may enter production on a small scale in 2017, after the completion of the aircraft's test flights, according to the Wuhan-based Hubei Daily.

The Chengdu J-20 is a stealth, twin-engine fifth-generation fighter aircraft prototype being developed by Chengdu Aerospace Corporation for the Chinese People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). The J-20 made its first flight on 11 January 2011.

Citing the test flight of the fourth prototype of the J-20 with the serial number 2012 earlier this month, the Hubei Daily said that the development of Chinese stealth fighters has become more mature. It took a year for the second prototype of the J-20 to complete its test flight after the first one, however, it took the 2012 prototype only four months to complete this procedure after the third aircraft–bearing the serial number 2011–completed a test flight…"

picture

Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars24 Jul 2014 11:06 p.m. PST

And I will be impressed when there are more than 4 prototypes flying.

I will be really impressed when Chinese-made engines last more than 30 hours flight time. Even the Russian ones make it 400 hours, and Americans complain about engine life of less than 1500 hours!

GROSSMAN25 Jul 2014 6:19 a.m. PST

I bet it never goes into production, this is little more than keeping up with the Jones-es.

Charlie 1225 Jul 2014 5:52 p.m. PST

Interesting… No engine vectoring. You'd think the Chinese would give a shot.

SouthernPhantom27 Jul 2014 7:11 a.m. PST

coastal2, I suspect that the additional engineering work- on basically disposable engines, no less- really isn't worth the fairly limited performance gain. I'd take SA over nose-pointing any day of the week.

Lion in the Stars27 Jul 2014 12:43 p.m. PST

Except that the Russians showed a really slick way to use the normal 'turkey feathers' to get thrust vectoring: instead of using a solid, fixed mounting point for the inboard end of the actuators, they attach the actuators to a floating ring that is then attached to 3 larger hydraulic actuators, anchored farther up the engine.

If your stealth is good enough that radar-guided BVR missiles basically don't work, I sure as heck want some unholy maneuverability to spring on someone who gets vectored within sidewinder range by land-based radars. Land-based radars can easily handle the long wavelengths that modern stealth doesn't handle too well, but that require too big an antenna to work well in an aircraft.

Deadone27 Jul 2014 6:22 p.m. PST

And I will be impressed when there are more than 4 prototypes flying.

I will be really impressed when Chinese-made engines last more than 30 hours flight time. Even the Russian ones make it 400 hours, and Americans complain about engine life of less than 1500 hours!

Do you have any evidence about this?

You do realise most Chinese engines are licenced production of Russian as well as English designed Spey and various French designed Turbomeca turboshafts for helos? They actually offer an upgrade kit for Russian designed RD93.

They can always shove a Saturn AL31 into it anyhow. But that probably would just prove to you how useless and incompetent the Chinese are, even though the Swedes, South Koreans, Italians, Taiwanese and even Indians use American engines on their military jet aircraft.


Also if you have so little faith in China's aerospace industry, I recommend you never fly in a Boeing again as they have large amounts of Chinese built components. Indeed by 2007 China's was the largest non-US contributor to Boeing. This includes avionics and structural components.

Charlie 1227 Jul 2014 7:11 p.m. PST

The engine designs are fine, it's their manufacturing QC that gets them in trouble. And the Boeing example doesn't hold water since Boeing enforces their own QC standards. And their Chinese partners hit that standard or lose the contract.

Deadone28 Jul 2014 4:56 p.m. PST

The engine designs are fine, it's their manufacturing QC that gets them in trouble. And the Boeing example doesn't hold water since Boeing enforces their own QC standards. And their Chinese partners hit that standard or lose the contract.


Yup and I doubt the PLA has loose standards either. From what is known, the first batch of licence produced J-11 Flankers was rejected due to quality issues. And there's plenty of examples of cancelled projects in PLA or aircraft being cancelled or heavily modified after small production runs.

I'm not saying Chinese aviation is perfect. They are lagging in a number of critical areas in terms of design and capability (and indeed engines are one, especially when compared to Western designs). Avionics are another.

But they're not some sort of sad cliched useless imbeciles which is what a lot of Westerners like to think they are.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.