Help support TMP


"How do you prefer your supplements?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Showcase Article


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


886 hits since 14 Jun 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Weasel14 Jun 2014 2:24 p.m. PST

If a game is getting supplements how do you prefer them?
How do you feel about the following?

*Grab bags of various optional rules, expansions and bits that couldn't fit in the original game but might be nice to have.

*Covers a single theater, army, campaign or similar topic.

*Provides updated versions of rules from the main book, corrections and so on. (One and a half edition)

*Scenarios to play through but not a lot of new rules material.

*New OOB's, vehicles and stats


Anything else?

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP14 Jun 2014 2:52 p.m. PST

I always feel the main rules should have all the rules for playing the game.
Supplements should IMO contain special rules for specific situations or things outside the scope of normal games, whose inclusion in the main rules would make them overcomplex for play.

Grelber14 Jun 2014 2:56 p.m. PST

I think the grab bag of optional rules would be fine. Inevitably, somebody will decide your Franco-Prussian War rules are incredible, and they can modify them for use them for WWII. Of course, this won't happen until the rules have been out a while, so it won't have an opportunity to go in the original book.

Grelber

nnascati Supporting Member of TMP14 Jun 2014 4:47 p.m. PST

I prefer them FREE, once I've paid the money for the core rule set.

John the OFM14 Jun 2014 5:42 p.m. PST

*Scenarios to play through but not a lot of new rules material.

I do not play British Grenadier, but I love the scenario books. They are very well done, and will work for any rules set out there.
Any rules changes are irrelevant to me.

saltflats192914 Jun 2014 6:20 p.m. PST

Easy to swallow gel capsules.

Ottoathome15 Jun 2014 4:52 a.m. PST

Non existant.

They only ruin the game and if you put them in they will show up in every game. Same way if you have a 17" columbiad in the American Civil War, it will find its way into every game.

Dave Crowell15 Jun 2014 5:51 a.m. PST

I absolutely despise "edition one and a half" type supplements. Maybe it is the scars from White Dwarf in the Eighties and Squad Leader with the "here is a new set of rules to replace the new rules we gave you last time".

I don't mind theatre/ campaign focused supplements. If I have no interest in for example Bongolesia's Drive to the Desert in '75 I just don't buy that supplement.

I love scenario packs and orders of battle. Yes, this is information I could, and do, research for myself, but it is handy not to have to.

Fried Flintstone15 Jun 2014 10:02 a.m. PST

I do not play British Grenadier, but I love the scenario books. They are very well done, and will work for any rules set out there.

Same for the GdB scenario books – they are great.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.