Help support TMP


"A Concise History of Tiger Hunting in India and Guns " Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting the USS Meade

Having scratchbuilt a flying monitor, dampfpanzerwagon Fezian now paints and bases the model.


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


Featured Book Review


921 hits since 17 Apr 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0117 Apr 2014 10:37 p.m. PST

"India's tigers have been in the crosshairs for centuries, with elite safaris dating back to the early 16th century. They rose out of Mughal Emperor Jalal-ud-Din Muhammad Akbar's passion for big game: He began a tradition of royal hunting, or shikar, that was carried on by Mughal rulers until the dynasty fell in 1857. Paintings from the period depict Mongol, Rajput, Turk and Afghan nobility hunting from elephant or horseback. These outings were considered exotic, heroic sport—and tigers were the ultimate trophies.
Staging elaborate big game hunts was also a favorite pastime for the British Raj that succeeded the Mughals, an activity that showcased their royalty, machismo, power and wealth. They took out tigers with reckless abandon, along with their Indian counterparts that ruled (nominally) sovereign "Princely States." Kings and lords, generals, and Maharajas went out in large parties, carried by 10, 20, 30 or even 40 elephants; their servants often drugged and baited tigers before they arrived so the hunters were in little danger. They legitimized the slaughter by vilifying the cats, casting them as terrible, bloodthirsty beasts with an unquenchable desire for human flesh.
After ascending the throne in 1911, King George V and his retinue traveled north to Nepal, slaying 39 tigers in 10 days. Colonel Geoffrey Nightingale shot more than 300 tigers in India. In the 1920s, Umed Singh II, the Maharaja of Kotah, modified a flaming red Rolls Royce Phantom for tiger safaris in the Rajastani hills, outfitting it with spotlights for night hunting, a mounted machine gun and a Lantaka cannon. Newly-crowned Rewa kings in Central India thought it auspicious to slay 109 tigers after their coronation. Shooting a tiger was a coming-of-age ritual for young Indian princes.
According to historian Mahesh Rangarajan, "over 80,000 tigers…were slaughtered in 50 years from 1875 to 1925. It is possible that this was only a fraction of the numbers actually slain." Not all were trophy-hunted: In some regions, the cats were considered vermin, systematically exterminated with incentive from government bounties…"
Full article here.
link

Amicalement
Armand

Only Warlock18 Apr 2014 6:31 a.m. PST

One of my all time favorite books is "Man Eater of the Kumaon" by James Corbett detailing his stalking of Man Eating Tigers in India at the request of the local governments. Fascinating stuff.

jpattern218 Apr 2014 7:24 a.m. PST

They legitimized the slaughter by vilifying
A tried and true technique to justify any slaughter of man or beast, from Biblical times through to today.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.