Gunfreak | 04 Apr 2014 1:22 p.m. PST |
So I'm painting peter pig marines. And while painting the thompson, I realised I could clearly see it was an M1 or M1A1 not a M1928. Now for me this is quite obvious, if the bolt is on the side it's an M1/A1. But that would probebly have me burned at the stake in norway. But I suspect almost all wargamers that do americans/british can also tell the diffrence. |
Garand | 04 Apr 2014 1:58 p.m. PST |
I couldn't. But OTOH if it was a tank, I'd know when something is "off
" Damon. |
79thPA | 04 Apr 2014 3:28 p.m. PST |
I would venture to guess that most don't know or care. |
John the OFM | 04 Apr 2014 5:30 p.m. PST |
In 15mm? On the table? Don't care. |
Just Jack | 04 Apr 2014 6:13 p.m. PST |
Gunfreak, I don't think I understand. Are you saying your Marines shouldn't have M1 or M1A1 Thompsons? It looks right to me. Your Marines are wearing the 'brown-side out' helmet covers, meaning they're in 1943 or later, and my understanding is that the reorganization in 1943 after Bouganville pretty much removed Thompsons from the rifle platoons (officially, replacing them with BARs, three per squad), leaving Thompsons only in non-rifle elements like Weapons platoons, Weapons companies, engineers, reconnaissance, service companies, etc
And even then those were M1/M1A1s, not M1928s. Am I misunderstanding? I'm with OFM, I could certainly live with it either way, though I'd say the easier way to tell the difference is not the charging handle (bolt assist) but the lack of the big compensator on the M1928. Take care. V/R, Jack |
VonTed | 04 Apr 2014 6:37 p.m. PST |
|
Rhoderic III and counting | 04 Apr 2014 7:24 p.m. PST |
I don't think I understand. Are you saying your Marines shouldn't have M1 or M1A1 Thompsons?[
] Am I misunderstanding? I think he's saying that in Norway it's "unacceptable" to be knowledgeable about guns, which I'm interpreting as a bit of national self-deprecating humour. Norway may be the country of Breivik, which might put the whole gun issue on edge, but it also still has conscription (even if most people end up not serving). |
Just Jack | 04 Apr 2014 8:01 p.m. PST |
Rhoderic, Yes, now I understand, thanks! I feel a bit like a donkey, totally misunderstood, but now I get that the issue for him was knowing there was a difference between the Thompson variants
My turn to be burned at the stake ;) V/R, Jack |
Bobgnar | 04 Apr 2014 8:55 p.m. PST |
I did not get the subtle humor and appreciated JJ's useful commentary. |
Martin Rapier | 04 Apr 2014 11:53 p.m. PST |
I knew what he meant, but I must confess that until a few years ago the difference between a 1928 and an M1A1 completely passed me by. They were just Thompsons, with varying foregrips and magazines. The differences between various models of Sten OTOH
. Excessive knowledge of firearms is also viewed as the purview of gun nuts who live with their mothers over here too. |
Cerdic | 05 Apr 2014 6:38 a.m. PST |
As Martin has said, anyone in Britain who displays any knowledge (or worse, ENTHUSIASM) about guns is generally regarded as some sort of evil, loner, psycho, mass-murdering nutter. A few days ago on TV a very well-respected broadcaster happened to explain what rifling was and the difference between a rifle and a musket. Just off the cuff, during a conversation. The reaction was a mixture of shock and suspicion. Someone actually said, only half jokingly, that it was a bit worrying he knew so much about guns. |
79thPA | 05 Apr 2014 7:35 a.m. PST |
Thanks for putting that in context. Most American gamers still wouldn't have a clue. |
tuscaloosa | 05 Apr 2014 8:02 a.m. PST |
"Excessive knowledge of firearms is also viewed as the purview of gun nuts who live with their mothers over here too." Said mother usually possessing quite an arsenal herself. |
Milites | 05 Apr 2014 8:16 a.m. PST |
When I was working in Norway quite a few pick ups had rifles on a gun racks, in the back of the cab, have things changed? |
Gunfreak | 05 Apr 2014 8:59 a.m. PST |
Hunting is one thing, norway has always had a big tradition of hunting, but knowlage of automatic war weapons, are not the same. |
donlowry | 05 Apr 2014 9:01 a.m. PST |
Neither know nor care about the difference in Thompsons. But if you do, I don't mind. |
Lion in the Stars | 05 Apr 2014 1:24 p.m. PST |
"Excessive knowledge of firearms is also viewed as the purview of gun nuts who live with their mothers over here too."Said mother usually possessing quite an arsenal herself. And is probably the greater threat to public order
That's where you look at the person and say, "hey, I don't judge you for what you nerd out over." |
Ethanjt21 | 05 Apr 2014 10:23 p.m. PST |
I couldn't live without my guns. Then again I'm a gawd fearin uhmehrikan. Actually, I just like hunting. Can you bowhunt in England? Is there any way to obtain a fire arm just for hunting? |
Elenderil | 05 Apr 2014 11:45 p.m. PST |
Shotgun licences are easier to brain then Firearms licences (cover guns other than smooth bore weapons firing shot rather than bullets). There are hefty restrictions though. Can't have most if any repeating shotguns (so no pump actions) no repeating cartridge pistols (black powder replica revolvers are OK) no automatics. Hunting is pretty much restricted to shotguns and single shot rifles AFAIK. Got to go now Mother needs help cleaning her rifle. |
uglyfatbloke | 15 Apr 2014 6:46 a.m. PST |
So I don't suppose any of you would like to buy a Mk I Bren gun? Enfield, June 1940? thathistorybloke(AT)btinternet.com? spare mags , oiler, spares bag
|