Help support TMP


"What is Africa equipping for?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

No-Go-Zone


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Hasslefree's Ray

Adam gets to paint a cool figure, and then paint his dead counterpart.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,168 hits since 27 Mar 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0127 Mar 2014 11:09 p.m. PST

"Africa's air forces are on a buying spree. Flush with oil cash, many African states are investing heavily in modern multirole jet fighters, deadly helicopter gunship and even sophisticated air-defense systems with radars and surface-to-air missiles.

The deals are worth hundreds of millions of dollars in countries still lacking many basic social services. So it's worth asking exactly what Uganda, Angola, Sudan and the like are planning to do with their new air forces.

Some of the most interesting acquisitions involve modern, or modernized, Russian hardware. The Sukhoi Su-30—NATO codename "Flanker-C"—is a particular favorite of African governments. In just the last six years, African states together have acquired no fewer than 50 Su-30MKs…"
Full article here.
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1127 Mar 2014 11:40 p.m. PST

Not sure, but given historical precedents, I suspect they will not be maintained, or even piloted, as well as they should, so seems like a very large waste to me.

Perhaps it just boils down to most people love those big, superb looking Sukhois.

I know I'd definitely want a few, if I could afford them.

Will have to press on with small scale replicas of them, instead. At least that frees me from the maintenance and pilot training expenses.

DeltaBravo28 Mar 2014 3:18 a.m. PST

"The deals are worth hundreds of millions of dollars "

=> Back handers.

FoxtrotPapaRomeo28 Mar 2014 3:42 a.m. PST

Maintenance and training are not strong in Africa. 2013 article on the South African Air Force.

Twelve of the South African Air Force's 26 Gripen fighter jets are in long-term storage, according to defence minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, as the Air Force does not have the funding to fly them.

This emerged yesterday in reply to a parliamentary question posed by the opposition Democratic Alliance party's Shadow Minister of Defence and Military Veterans David Maynier.

"The South African Air Force (SAAF) has 12 Gripen Fighter Aircraft placed in long-term storage. These aircraft are placed in a storage as a planned activity in line with their utilization and budget expenditure patterns/flow of SAAF," Mapisa-Nqakula said.

"The Gripen fighter jets are supposed to provide the air combat capability for the South African Air Force (SAAF). However, the Gripen fighter jets are effectively grounded because the operating budget has been stripped to the bone and the SAAF cannot afford to operate the ‘Gripen system'," Maynier said.

Already in 2010 there was great concern that a lack of money would ground the Gripen. Then-defence minister Lindiwe Sisulu warned that the Gripens could be mothballed if the military failed to get hold of extra funding. The Department of Defence annual report released in 2010 warned that "Combined with the recent funding cuts for the medium-term expenditure framework period, the air force will only be able to sustain the Hawk system.

"Without adequate funding levels being provided, the air force will not be able to meet its mandate in terms of defence or its support of government initiatives in the medium and longer term. The unwanted reality is portions of aircraft fleets may have to be placed in long-term storage, and certain capabilities, units or bases may have to be closed down."

The lack of money for the Gripens has also affected flying hours and pilot training. In April 2011 then-chief of the Air Force Lieutenant General Carlo Gagiano said the Air Force was not going to fly the required number of hours due to a lack of funding and in its 2010/2011 report, the Department of Defence said that due to underfunding, the number of flight hours per Gripen aircrew member was reduced from 224 to 110 per year.

At present the SAAF can only muster six qualified Gripen pilots who only have 150 flying hours available across the whole Gripen squadron this year, according to Maynier. The annual target for fighter flying hours was 250 for the 2011/2012 period, according to the Department of Defence's most recent Annual Report.

Chief of the Air Force Lieutenant General Zakes Msimang when asked about Gripen flying hours earlier this year, said that the Air Force had never failed to deliver what was asked of it.

Defence analyst Helmoed-Römer Heitman noted the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) requires fighter pilots to log at least 20 flight hours per month (240 flight hours per year per fighter pilot) to remain qualified.

"One of the biggest scandals of the Arms Deal is that we bought military equipment we could not afford to operate. And there is no better illustration of the point than the Gripen fighter jets in long-term storage," Maynier said. "It is imperative that the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, reviews the allocation of the operating funding to the "Gripen system" in the SAAF."

In 2007 it emerged that the Gripens cost R19.08 billion, up from the original R17.8 billion estimate for both 26 Gripens and 24 Hawks.

It is unlikely that the Gripen situation will improve anytime soon, as the defence budget for the 2013/14 financial year stands at R40.2 billion, just R1.8 billion more than the previous year's.

Lion in the Stars28 Mar 2014 10:31 a.m. PST

Perhaps it just boils down to most people love those big, superb looking Sukhois.

I know I'd definitely want a few, if I could afford them.

I know! I'd love to get ahold of a Strike Flanker with all the weapons removed and modify the back end of the enlarged cockpit for a couple more seats. High-speed business jet!

SouthernPhantom28 Mar 2014 6:53 p.m. PST

Lion, I'd personally acquire a few R-73s (not joking…)- but I'd have to agree with wanting one.

Personally, though- I can't wait for the Greek F-4s to hit the civilian market. If I somehow wound up with a large sum of cash, you bet your bottom dollar I'd buy one.

Chuckaroobob28 Mar 2014 8:49 p.m. PST

There's gotta be a bunch of F-4 out in the desert storage. Weren't we converting a handful of them to target drones?

Deadone29 Mar 2014 5:08 a.m. PST

Bare in mind Angola "has to" replace old MiG-21s and MiG-23s.

Also some of these acquisitions aren't new – Ethiopia brought Flankers in late 1990s/early 2000s.

The SU-25 sales have also been coming over 15 years.


Only new sales (I am aware of) are:

Algeria – 18 ex Indian Su-30K from Belarus

Uganda – 6 confirmed Su-30MK and apparently 6 more.

Sudan – a squadron of ex-Belarus Su-24 Fencer (not Flankers) for bombing ops against South Sudan. Also acquired 24 brand new MiG-29SMTs.


The F-7 is no longer available – last 16 went to Bangladesh last year and line has shut down.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse29 Mar 2014 9:35 a.m. PST

African Nations have the right to defend themselves … from their neighbors if nothing else … But if they follow their passed maintenance procedures … many/some may be hanger queens, sooner or later …

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.