Help support TMP


"The Last of the Dive-bombers" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Aviation Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

War at Sea: Task Force Preview

Paul Glasser previews the upcoming expansion set for War at Sea.


Featured Book Review


1,093 hits since 5 Feb 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Robert Kennedy05 Feb 2014 8:37 p.m. PST

"The Last of the Dive-bombers
By Walter J. Boyne

The Army Air Forces turned to dive-bombers for accuracy, but the A-24 Banshee found itself in the wrong places at the wrong times.

In warfare, as in business, timing and location are everything.

The classic Douglas dive-bomber of World War II served the Navy brilliantly as the SBD Dauntless, while the virtually identical A-24 Banshee had only a mediocre career with the US Army Air Forces. There were many reasons for this, but the main one was the combination of the Navy's long-standing training in dive-bombing and the nature of its targets, which allowed the SBD to perform.

In contrast, dive-bombing was thrust upon the heavy-bomber-centric AAF following the spectacular successes of the German Junkers Ju 87 Stuka in the initial phases of World War II. The undeniably menacing look of the Ju 87 certainly made the pitch easier as well.

An A-24 on the ramp on Makin, in the Gilbert Island chain.

When at last the AAF sought to obtain a dive-bombing capability, it took delivery of Douglas A-24s (erstwhile Navy SBD-3s) in mid-1941. Unfortunately, the Banshee had too little performance and was too late in the game. The AAF service of the A-24 might be characterized as brave but undistinguished. Yet during the same time period, the naval SBD Dauntless versions of the aircraft were writing history in a series of decisive battles from the Coral Sea through Midway and well into 1944.

The Dauntless was ultimately replaced by the larger, faster, but less forgiving, Curtiss SB2C Helldiver, but it remained a favorite among Navy and Marine fliers."
PDF link

Coelacanth06 Feb 2014 6:40 a.m. PST

Thanks for an interesting article.

Ron

troopwo Supporting Member of TMP06 Feb 2014 8:30 a.m. PST

I suppose everyone forgets the A36 version of the Mustang.

Robert Kennedy06 Feb 2014 1:32 p.m. PST

Nope. I had posted a thread about the A-36 just recently wink. LOL Robert

Lion in the Stars09 Feb 2014 8:38 p.m. PST

Had no clue that the USAAF had used the "slow but deadly."

I need to find a 1/144 or 1/100 scale model of an A36 to support my Americans in North Africa and Sicily…

Robert Kennedy10 Feb 2014 3:34 a.m. PST

I was thrown off when I first saw a photo of an A-24 in olive drab LOL. Robert

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.