Help support TMP


"A-6 Intruder" Topic


20 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board

Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Hasslefree's Ray

Adam gets to paint a cool figure, and then paint his dead counterpart.


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


Featured Movie Review


3,085 hits since 2 Jan 2014
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Robert Kennedy02 Jan 2014 1:17 p.m. PST

"The Intruder's lack of eye appeal has resulted in a low-key image in the minds of many uninformed aviation enthusiasts. But throughout its 32 years of service, it has earned and maintained a reputation as the workhorse of Naval Aviation from the countless Battle Group Commanders who were responsible for projecting United States power abroad. Time is one of the key yardsticks used to determine the relative success or failure of almost anything man develops. And time has clearly signaled the success of the A6 design. It leaves the fleet as it entered, the sign and how adaptable that design is to accepting improvements and technology. The A6 has proven exceptional in both areas. The design has been adapted several times to include the A6B, a Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) suppression aircraft, the A6C TRIM, the first aircraft equipped with electro-optical sensors (precursor of the A6E Target Recognition Attack Multi-sensor or TRAM), and of course the KA6D) tanker aircraft. The mission capabilities have also been continuously updated to include state of the art avionics and sensors. The Intruder started with a Digital Integrated Attack and Navigation Equipment (DIANE) system using drum computers and separate track and navigation radars. The system now employs an integrated search/track radar, Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) and Laser sensors used for target identification and self contained Laser Guided Bomb delivery. The System Weapons Improvement Program modified the aircraft to include a 1553 digital data transfer bus. This upgrade enables the Intruder to employ multiple advanced precision guided missiles for attacking ground and sea based targets and also anti-radiation missiles for conducting SAM suppression missions. Many Intruders have been further modified to incorporate Night Vision Goggle cockpits, enabling aircrews to employ an additional sensor, Night Vision goggles, in prosecuting night multiplane attacks."
link

picture

link
picture

The Monstrous Jake02 Jan 2014 1:30 p.m. PST

Thirty-two years is a pretty good run for any aircraft type, especially one designed for carrier service.

Sundance02 Jan 2014 2:21 p.m. PST

I love the A-6. I met an EA-6B driver – at the time he held the record for carrier landings. Hopefully, it still stands. In fact both he and his plane are on the box cover of the 1/72 Hasegawa EA-6B, IIRC.

GROSSMAN02 Jan 2014 3:02 p.m. PST

And a better bomber than the Hornet? Range/tonnage?

Grumpy Monkey02 Jan 2014 3:39 p.m. PST

"The Intruder's lack of eye appeal"

Really I always found it very cool and sexy for a plane.

werwulf02 Jan 2014 3:55 p.m. PST

@grossman the A-6 was dubbed the mini BUFF, BUFF being the B-52's name. A-6 could carry approximatly 18,000 lbs, range 5222km. F-18 is rated at about 13,700 lbs, range 2000km. My favourite version of the A-6 would have to be the EA-6A Wild Weasel/ Electric Intruder aircraft used by the USMC.

Lion in the Stars02 Jan 2014 4:09 p.m. PST

It took the development of the Super Hornet to equal the Intruder's bombload, and the super bug can only haul that load half the distance!

Robert Kennedy02 Jan 2014 5:07 p.m. PST
charles popp02 Jan 2014 5:37 p.m. PST

Yeah shame how the power projection of the USN Carriers is not what it used to be with the retiring of the F-14 and A-6.

Mako1102 Jan 2014 11:06 p.m. PST

Yea, I always thought it was pretty neat looking.

Not quite Vigilante impressive, but still, quite nice looking, nonetheless, and with a very nice bomb carrying capacity.

Robert Kennedy02 Jan 2014 11:10 p.m. PST

Always reminded me of an insect grin LOL. Robert

desert war03 Jan 2014 5:17 p.m. PST

If the aircraft carrier is the USNs stick. Then the A-6 was the thick end you wack someone with. I would have loved to fly one.

Wyatt the Odd Fezian03 Jan 2014 8:04 p.m. PST

What the USN gains by retiring the F-14 and A6 is a fleet made up of a common airframe. With the F/A-18G "Growler" you no longer have your strike package slowed down by the electronic warfare aircraft.

Wyatt

Lion in the Stars03 Jan 2014 8:33 p.m. PST

Except the F18C/D doesn't have the legs, has to sacrifice the two highest-capacity pylons for fuel tanks.

This may be less of an issue when the airbase can fly closer to the coastline, and the USN is talking about making the UCLASS drones the equivalent of the old EKA-3B Skywarrior. EW, tanker, and maybe even recon or AWACs.

Robert Kennedy03 Jan 2014 8:47 p.m. PST
Robert Kennedy04 Jan 2014 2:33 p.m. PST
Robert Kennedy07 Jan 2014 2:43 a.m. PST

Airpower Classics: A-6 Intruder – Air Force Magazine
link

Intruder Tales
link

Deadone07 Jan 2014 7:46 p.m. PST

I agree with the sentiment that the loss of F-14/A-6 combo was a big hit to naval power projection.

Especially with long range missions to landlocked area ala Afghanistan and development of long range Chinese and Russian anti-shipping missiles.

F/A-18 is the ultimate jack of all trades and master of none.

Robert Kennedy08 Jan 2014 9:43 a.m. PST

Description of the Initial Combat Use of the A-6 PAVEKNIFE Airborne Laser Designator
link

Robert Kennedy10 Jan 2014 12:43 p.m. PST

Legends of Vietnam: Shoulder to Shoulder
The Grumman A-6 was ugly, but it sure could cook.

"On a May afternoon in 1972 a flight of four Grumman A-6 Intruders, the lead elements in an air wing strike, flew a hundred feet above North Vietnamese rice paddies west of the Gulf of Tonkin, about 25 miles south of Hanoi. Loaded with Mk 20 Rockeye bomblet canisters, the jets were headed toward Bai Thuong, an enemy airfield. Navy pilot and air group commander Roger Sheets flew the lead Intruder. He and his bombardier/navigator Charlie Carr, a Marine Corps captain, used the aircraft's radar and visual cues to guide them to Bai Thuong. "The A-6 was the all-weather attack aircraft," says Carr. "Monsoon season never affected our operations." But that day was clear; Sheets and Carr were getting a good look at North Vietnam, and any other aircraft sharing that patch of sky could get a good look at them.

As the Intruders approached their target, they climbed to 200 feet. From the right seat, Carr spotted enemy MiGs above. They looked like little arrowheads circling watchfully about 1,500 feet up. He threw a switch and informed Sheets that the A-6's three-plus tons of ordnance were now armed.

"We came in underneath this wheel of MiGs," Carr recalls, "maybe 12, 15 of them. We were hoping to catch them on the ground and bomb the hell out of 'em. The airbase was alerted, however."

Sheets kept the A-6 straight and level as they approached the airfield. A few seconds later he thumbed the release on the stick, freed all 12 Mk 20s, and banked the Intruder hard to the left.

Carr remembers seeing one of the MiGs dive toward them. "OK, so now we had a problem," says Carr. "Now the MiG-17 was on our tail."
link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.