| bgbboogie | 18 Nov 2013 5:39 a.m. PST |
Does any one else use marching paces as laid down to move their troops. We played a Russian Division covering a retreat from the pursuing French, what a difference it made, a great little game using 18 men stand = 1 platoon in 6mm, the Cavalry were bionic with their moves. |
| MajorB | 18 Nov 2013 5:55 a.m. PST |
Yes. In my home grown Napoleonic rules I use the march rates as laid down in the 1824 Kriegsspiel: Infantry March 100 paces/minute Attack 125 Skirmishers 200 Cavalry Walk 100 Trot 300 Trot & walk 200 Gallop 450 Gallop, heavy 400 Artillery Foot – as Infantry Horse as Heavy Cavalry |
| Etranger | 18 Nov 2013 8:51 p.m. PST |
The computer moderated Carnage & Glory rules use paces as a unit of measurement. From memory Charles Grant also used them in his rules. |
| COL Scott ret | 19 Nov 2013 4:04 a.m. PST |
Yes C.S. Grant did use them in his rules, I still picture him marching arround counting off paces. So when I play those rules I am using paces, though I often just talk about inches on the table. |
| MajorB | 19 Nov 2013 5:57 a.m. PST |
The computer moderated Carnage & Glory rules use paces as a unit of measurement. From memory Charles Grant also used them in his rules. Interesting. Do C&G and the Grant rules use the 1824 Kreigsspiel rates or something different? |
| bgbboogie | 19 Nov 2013 7:28 a.m. PST |
I have played again using the Russian marching paces v the French marching pacing, quite a difference again. |
| ratisbon | 19 Nov 2013 8:39 a.m. PST |
There may be a slight difference in the length of a pace from nation to nation. 100 paces is ordinary for campaigns 125 or quick time is battlefield maneuver. Bob Coggins |
| bgbboogie | 19 Nov 2013 11:38 a.m. PST |
I have decided to use historical from now on, it makes a massive difference and improvement to the whole game. |
| MajorB | 19 Nov 2013 12:03 p.m. PST |
100 paces is ordinary for campaigns125 or quick time is battlefield maneuver. per minute? |
| Lion in the Stars | 19 Nov 2013 12:27 p.m. PST |
yep. Modern military marching is done at 120 30" steps per minute, but that's on paved or otherwise flat ground. 300 feet per minute. Slow-time March, used for funerals, is 60 steps per minute. The current US doubletime march is 180 36" steps per minute. That's a bit easier to do on uneven ground, oddly. Works out to a 9min30sec mile, which is reasonably easy to keep up for a long period. And what I've read says that the British Rifles still march at the 140 step per minute pace they started with back in the way-backs. |
deadhead  | 19 Nov 2013 12:35 p.m. PST |
The stereotype is that Prussians strut arrogantly, British stride confidently, Yanks saunter relaxed, Italians run in the opposite direction and the French mince around so as not to muddy their shoes
There, that has upset everyone and added nothing. In all seriousness, having marched at Rifles' (Royal Green Jackets) (UK light infantry) space (a very long time ago)you have to remember what the Light Division could do when needed! Daft thing was we stepped out faster but took shorter steps, which was hard on those of us that bit taller. (Having typed this I have only now, just in time, noticed comment above about Rifles!) Another thing. Try walking up that Mt St J ridge on a muddy day. Not through the crops, remember
.not after several units have already been up that ridge. Try walking from Wavre to Plancenoit (I haven't done it yet but intend to
but only with a nice hotel and sleep the night before, a good breakfast, modern kit and nothing heavy and no one waiting to kill me when I get there) But you have to try, or wargames would never happen. Just accept the real thing ain't like that |
| bgbboogie | 20 Nov 2013 12:15 a.m. PST |
@Deadahead my Granddad was 1 KRRC 1910 – 16 then & 7 KRRC for the Somme (Poor B*****D) I have based my calculations on what the drill manual says and what is indeed the ploughed field reality, so maybe I will get a happy medium somewhere. I intend to use the marching paces for the good ground and slower speeds up hills etc. |