Help support TMP


"Marines' robot mule" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Checking Out a Boardgame, Episode II

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks for scenario material in a World War IV boardgame.


710 hits since 16 Nov 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
doc mcb16 Nov 2013 5:21 a.m. PST

link

I for one welcome our robot slaves.

page 8:

The LS3 performed well in tests in the California desert, where it could scramble up rocks and avoid those too big to climb. In Georgia, it crossed streams and tore through mud. But out here in the thick woods of Massachusetts, across ground strewn with wet leaves, the environment offered other challenges.

And the nature of the combat drills brought up a series of new questions. Where will the robot go if there is contact with an enemy? What would the most useful commands be in a tactical situation? If the robot is retreating, will that disrupt Marine reinforcements coming toward the sound of gunfire? Is it a good idea to take cover behind the robot? (Future versions will be armored.) Can Boston Dynamics program a shortcut command that the operator could utter that sends the LS3 to the rear, without wasting time on the controller? (Yes, they say.)

Beedle walks across the field and heads into the woods with the rest of the squad. The robot in this test, an LS3 called Norfolk, follows him. About a dozen program observers trail them, trying not to be anxious. The LS3 will halt and sit down if it loses contact with Beedle, who patiently walks back until the sensors reacquire the pattern on his backpack. The Marine switches back and forth between follow-tight mode and direct joystick control.

The machine handles thin brush and inclines well and regains its footing when it plunges a leg into one of the many leaf-filled holes. The speed at which it can rebalance is a marvel, shooting a leg out to stop a collapse. Then, while trying to follow Beedle's path, it hits a 4-inch-thick tree. You'd think Norfolk could take out this obstacle, and, indeed, it tries, banging its girth against the wood and tearing bark. But the struggle inflicts more damage to the robot—by dumb luck the tree is wedged into the front-leg socket, severing the connective wiring that sends commands to the computer in its chest. The leg is crippled and Norfolk is down for the count.

Beedle walks over sheepishly. "I like this system," he says. "It sucks that I broke it."

An ATV with a crane, used by the lumber industry to haul logs in terrain with no roads, ferries the crippled LS3 out of the woods. The engineers at Boston Dynamics try to look at this not as a failure but a learning experience. The impact tore through the thin plastic guard that protects that wiring. No other LS3 will ever have this critical junction so exposed again. "This," Bondaryk says, "is why we test."

Read more: The Day the Marines Met Their Robotic Mule – Popular Mechanics

Milites16 Nov 2013 5:57 a.m. PST

I've always said, get a working (can emulate the actions of a horse) robotic quadruped and scouts will gain a new lease of life. Wheels are great, until you come to the most modest of barriers and inclines. A robot horse could negotiate all manner of terrain that an ATV would struggle with.

Who'd have thought it, riding might become part of the scouts skill set again!

doc mcb16 Nov 2013 7:10 a.m. PST

Yeah, once they get one that is faster and smaller, it will make sense to make a drone killer type weapon. Good in urban and dense woods environments where flyers can't see.

whoa Mohamed16 Nov 2013 7:59 a.m. PST

The Mules premise was to lighten the load of heavily armoured legs while also having a casualty evac capability.
Its desighn enhanced its value to SOF ,Mountain and other speacilty troop that would operate in terrain that wheeled UGVs would find diffulcult to operate in. There is a wheeled version that can be automated to follow waypoints or be operated by command by wire means.it is semi autonomis and can travel to resup points or aid stations with wounded and then return to the owning unit with supplies it looks like a smallish ATV. Then there are the combat types which carry weapons or missiles…

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP16 Nov 2013 9:30 a.m. PST

Yes, they have been working on such a device for sometime … it would certainly be useful with Spec Ops and others running ops in difficult terrain … But as time goes on … we'll most likely see more 'bots in our combat forces in the future … hopefully something like user-friendly T-2s as well …

Mick the Silversmith16 Nov 2013 1:46 p.m. PST

Drone tankettes AND even smaller weapons platforms make a lot of sense. Put one of these on point, or let it move to an overwatch position and even if it is destroyed, the platoon still just offloads another from a truck. Just remains the question of how easy to hide them, and how fast they can move.

I do like the idea of a logistics hauling drone. Not all military equipment needs to be able to shoot.

James Wright16 Nov 2013 9:14 p.m. PST

The problem with this particular one, at its current stage, is that it SERIOUSLY violates noise discipline. It is *really* loud.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.