| ferg981 | 15 Oct 2013 10:29 a.m. PST |
Good evening I'm debating branching out into small scale modern conflicts and have been reading into the Yugoslav civil wars of the early-mid 90's which have interested me since University – however I haven't been able to identify any suitable figures Is this because it's considered a "griefy" conflict and a bit un-pc to wargame it? Or am I just useless at using google to find miniatures? F |
| nickinsomerset | 15 Oct 2013 10:38 a.m. PST |
Plenty of figures and equipment in 15, 20 and 28mm. To add realism make sure anyone playing the part of the warring factions has bad teeth and drinks plenty of cheap alcohol prior to and during the game! AK-47 lends itself to playing the conflict very well with plenty of treachery, confusion and UN dithering! Tally Ho! |
Uesugi Kenshin  | 15 Oct 2013 11:07 a.m. PST |
Peter Pig Makes some suitable figures in 15mm. Eureka makes some 15mm Modern Russians and Chechens that could be used. There is a a good 20mm company for this theater too but cant remember the name. Ive got lots of books on the conflict. If you are interested in any (cheap for the lot) PM me. |
| macedon | 15 Oct 2013 12:16 p.m. PST |
|
| Gaz0045 | 15 Oct 2013 12:37 p.m. PST |
Yep , RH Models for their Eastern Europeans range, supplemented by various 'regular' equipped units
. Also have a look at Chechens for better equipped foreign volunteers (mujaheddin)
.played lots of games – often with three or four way victory conditions and opponents/ allies
. |
| Chouan | 15 Oct 2013 12:52 p.m. PST |
Lots of massacres of civilians, mass rapes etc. as well to re-enact. Should be lots of fun. |
| Milites | 15 Oct 2013 2:01 p.m. PST |
Make sure your ramshackle armour has obscene insults painted on, the cruder the better! Chouan, given your 'logic', defining a conflict by it's atrocities, WWII is right out. Lots of concentration camps and massacring civilians. Actually, most wargaming in any era, whatever the scale, is ruled out, as the strategic picture often involves atrocities committed by the combatants. A civilians lot in wartime is not a happy one, even if ostensibly their country has gone to war to 'save' their territorial integrity/values. |
| Cincinnatus | 15 Oct 2013 8:30 p.m. PST |
The atrocities to actual combat ratio was pretty high compared to most other wars people might consider gaming. |
| Charles Besly | 15 Oct 2013 9:21 p.m. PST |
Empress Miniatures makes bought red star which has at least of what you are looking for there Insurgent force would also be usable. I don't know would the more generic ZNLA from Eureka work. The suggestions I am making are all in 28mm. Also looking to the future Empress is going to be holding another Kickstarter next year that is Eastern bloc based. Good Luck! |
| Gaz0045 | 16 Oct 2013 1:46 a.m. PST |
Here's a free Ebook that 's worth a look link
As well as the figures listed above,I use some Platoon 20 Russians as JNA and some GDR (East Germans) as Croatians
.lots of diecast vehicles about too in 1/72 and even some WW2 kit like T34's and even Shermans and M10 tank destroyers
. |
| GeoffQRF | 16 Oct 2013 2:56 a.m. PST |
The atrocities to actual combat ratio was pretty high compared to most other wars people might consider gaming. link Civilian deaths due to military activity and crimes against humanity Yugoslavia, 448k soldiers, 558k civilians Romania, 300k soldiers, 599k civilians Czechoslovakia, 25k soldiers, 300k civilians WW2 didn't really have a great record, but you probably do need to pick your conflicts, or tailor your scenarios. Can't say as i have ever seen a scenario where the intention was to salughter as many civilians as possible
|
| Chouan | 16 Oct 2013 3:01 a.m. PST |
Which is what "ethnic cleansing" usually became. I'm not sure that any conflict whose purpose was mass killing is reasonable to game, or where killing or raping civilians was the main purpose of the military action. It doesn't matter whether the conflict is recent or historical. |
| Chatticus Finch | 16 Oct 2013 3:18 a.m. PST |
You say it isn't reasonable, I say it's a historical scenario, much like playing a game of the Chinese defence of Shanghai, or of Warsaw resistance in '44
nothing forces you to add those particular horrors (and if you did you'd find it hard to find an opponent). Suck it up, or don't play the mission, simple. |
| Chouan | 16 Oct 2013 6:23 a.m. PST |
But one could argue that the Japanese objective in Shanghai was the capture of the city, the civilian deaths were coincidental. In Bosnia the civilian deaths were the objective. |
| Gaz0045 | 16 Oct 2013 6:41 a.m. PST |
The Eastern Front by that moral compass would be well off limits then, the eradication of the inhabitants for Lebensraum et al. The Yugoslav Wars may not be to your taste, so don't game it
..I'm interested in the military side of the conflict which was basically for territory and power
with assorted kit and varied standards of training. I'm not keen on gaming WW1 Western Front
but each to their own, after all it is a pastime not a rehearsal for ethnic cleansing. |
| Cincinnatus | 16 Oct 2013 7:48 a.m. PST |
GeoffQRF – I'd have to see those numbers broken down into more discrete categories because as it is, those numbers don't really tell us much that's relevant to the point. For example, civilians in a combat zone will end up dying as collateral damage. In WW2, numbers of Jews and other groups classified as "undesirables" were sent to concentration camps where they died. Both of those groups would fall under your civilian deaths due to military activity or crimes against humanity. But I don't think either of them would be what I would consider to be a major focus of military operations (the thing we game). In the 1990's the killing of civilians and the mass scale movement of populations (regardless of the cost in human lives) was a major focus to many military operations. So it's not to say there isn't scope for gaming that period but it's one that has some very key aspects that most would consider in poor taste. Even sticking to just the military part of it, I think most people would only be able to explore a portion of it due to that. |
| zardoz1957 | 16 Oct 2013 7:57 a.m. PST |
Get off your high horse Chouan. Using your logic in WWII the German invasion of Russia was just a front for industrializing extermination in camps behind the lines. Go play with your German tanks. |
| nickinsomerset | 16 Oct 2013 8:15 a.m. PST |
Bosnians – Thousands of blokes that will take your money, tell you that they are your friends then shoot you in the back and blames the Croats/Serbs Croats – Thousands of blokes that will take your money then shoot you in the back and blames the Bosnians/Serbs! Serbians – Thousands of blokes that will just shoot you. It was an interesting place, in 94 at various times everyone was fighting everyone else with everyone else (The Maglai finger sometimes becoming a pocket at the whim of the Croats at the base (The Croats in the North always fought against the Serbs) In Mostar the Bosnians "hired" the Serbian Arty to shell the Croats and a Muslim warlord in Sarajevo changed sides because he was not paid enough. Meanwhile in Zenica the Muhajidin who arrived to help the cause had bust ups with the local Bosnians who despite being muslim like discos, short skirts, alcohol and bacon butties! The fighting involved mainly infantry with some tanks, as above including M-84 and M36B2, were useds as fire support. An interesting tour! Tally Ho! |
| Cincinnatus | 16 Oct 2013 8:20 a.m. PST |
Yes, the word "military" has a pretty loose definition during that period. |
| WarpSpeed | 16 Oct 2013 9:23 a.m. PST |
Typical day of ops,noon-wake up,shake off a hangover with slivo.Mid afternoon-arrange for a press op, invite local friends and their children as well,call a mortar strike in and blame your enemy.Dinner time-eat,drink,plan to avenge your fallen civies
go forward rape,pillage and murder indiscriminately.Night-its time for more slivo,rest knowing you did your days work.Maybe tomorrow you wake up mid afternoon,modify schedule accordingly |
| Altius | 16 Oct 2013 10:31 a.m. PST |
The helicopter company I worked for had a 1-year contract to fly in Bosnia near the end of that unpleasantness, before all the shooting stopped. We ended up losing an aircraft and the pilot barely survived (minus an eyeball). Overall, it was an awful experience for all the guys directly involved in the project. The impressions I had from my decidedly narrow perspective was that it was a particularly ugly conflict and I've never had an urge to game it since then. In my mind, it just has a sort of "slimy" feel to it, for lack of a better word. I realize, however, that that is a bit of a paradox. After all, all wars have the same ugly, slimy characteristic, and yet we wargamers manage to play out a battle without dwelling on the ugliness of death camps, the institution of slavery, pogroms, "collateral damage", etcetera. We typically don't concern ourselves with those issues and instead concentrate on the actions of the military forces devoid of ideology. I think a person could do the same with this conflict if they so desired. Say, just concentrate on skirmishes between armed groups, without touching on the terrible things done to the civilians and prisoners. I'm certainly not going to throw any stones from my glass house or else I'll have to get rid of all my 15mm moderns, my beloved RCW armies, my Napoleonics*, and every other painted soldier in my collection. *Goya, for example, doesn't paint a very genteel picture of Napoleonic troops. |
| Milites | 16 Oct 2013 11:10 a.m. PST |
Gaming the Chechen War seems to be quite popular, but that was a very 'slimy' war. I like the adjective slimy, to describe the darker displays of inhumanity. We could have a slimy rating for conflicts, to act as a rating system for morally aware gamers. The AIW's would get a low slimy rating, but Lebanon a high one, perhaps. Nick, I was told one of the weapon system the Brits were vary wary about, especially the Warrior crews, was the 57mm S-60, because of its ROF and punch. |
| tuscaloosa | 16 Oct 2013 11:35 a.m. PST |
"
that it was a particularly ugly conflict " I think what made the Yugoslav civil wars particularly ugly were that they were fraternal, with peoples who had lived among one another, intermarried and had close relations, suddenly turning against one another. Somehow the hate seems different then. The Yugoslav policy of national defense by creating a "people in arms" and storing stocks of materiel throughout the country, meant that a village could suddenly become a well armed mob (to an extent not even the U.S. could probably match). |
| Bangorstu | 17 Oct 2013 4:01 a.m. PST |
Just come back from Dubrovnik – and the museum there on Mount Srd is interesting albeit perhaps a bit one-sided.. But it was certainly fratricidal. However when the Croats declared UDI they offered all of their Serbs in the Krajina autonomy. The Serbs rejected this and responded by brutal ethnic cleansing followed up by a programme of destroying Catholic churches, historical monuments etc. The ethnic cleansing was in time reversed of course
. But the Croats at least did make overtures initially – and 5% of the Croatian population is still Serbian and discrimination (while practised) is illegal. As for equipment, Dalmatia doesn't lend itself to much except infantry and naval actions though there were some T34/85s invovled down there. Lot of ad hoc naval units trying to run supplies into Dubrovnik. |
| ferg981 | 17 Oct 2013 5:56 a.m. PST |
Don't worry people It wasn't my intention to wargame some ethnic cleansing, we are all aware of the nasty side of this conflict As mentioned by someone earlier I am more interested in the dynamics of the conflict, particularly the different factions and the potential to game scenarios with a UN presence perhaps affecting victory conditions or objectives F |