Help support TMP


"Review of Miniature Wargames (with Battlegames) #366" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Magazines and Periodicals Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

The TMP 2016 Christmas Project

Fundraising for our Christmas charity project.


Current Poll


1,575 hits since 26 Sep 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

ubercommando26 Sep 2013 1:55 p.m. PST

A day late, a dollar short but here goes. I want to cover the issue in a bit more depth than the other discussion topic on this board.

FIRST IMPRESSIONS: This isn't the "new" format for me anymore: The bedding in process is over and in the last two issues I feel the magazine has settled. It had hit the ground running since the re-launch, with provocative opinions, quirky humour and not your standard topics covered either, would it still be doing this half a dozen or so issues in? Looking at the cover, we have a nice Wild West skirmish scene with Mexicans and an eclectic mix of topics from Donald Featherstone tributes to the Siege of Malta via Zululand.

BRIEFING: What other magazine lists the editor's contact details right down to his address and phone number? It gives the impression that Henry the heartbeat of the magazine and his imprint is right throughout. A nice tribute to Donald Featherstone in his editorial, which will be repeated throughout the issue.

FORWARD OBSERVER: I've found Neil Shuck to be VERY opinionated about what he likes in wargaming and what he doesn't and sometimes that's at odds with my tastes. But give him his due, he's thorough at investigating what's out there and as well as his usual previews of forthcoming games releases, he chimes in about historical accuracy in TV programmes, reserving particular anger towards The White Queen. I'm not a fan of the show, but that's mainly down to it being something like Twilight in doublet and hose.

ARE THESE JUST CREPE: The wargaming widow shows you how to make American Indian long houses out of insulation material and crepe paper. As a scratch building numpty, I read these articles and then go out and buy pre-built stuff.

FANTASY FACTS: "The Tread" continues his welcome return to regular column writing. As usual you get reviews of newly released sci-fi and fantasy gaming products, which goes over the same ground as Mr Shuck's column but doesn't repeat any of the games mentioned earlier. As well as describing new releases, he talks about "open" and "closed" scenery (whether you want your buildings with floors and lift off roofs) which is something that I never considered before, but I will now.

STOP THIEF! A quirky little Zulu war skirmish scenario which has a secret surprise in store for the British player. I'll say no more but if your gaming group is into the whimsical, then this kind of thing will be right up your alley.

THE WILD WEST: A Hollywood-ised set of skirmish rules for Wild West gaming. I was disappointed the author didn't include dynamite or cavalry carbines as weapons but he scores bonus points for a lovely text description of a scene from Rio Bravo.

COMMAND CHALLENGE: Based on a classic Donald Featherstone scenario, Henry Hyde has set it in a fictionalised 18th Century Europe and the challenge is to fight a battle for control of prominent terrain features but with your forces entering one battalion at a time.

TEALIGHT IRONCLADS: More DIY wargaming materiel, this time how to make Victorian era gunboats out of cardboard and those little tea light candles. The results aren't realistic, but they're representational and could lead to a fun club game if I weren't so cack handed at this kind of thing.

SEND THREE AND FOURPENCE: Regular columnist Conrad Kinch muses on a tangential wargames topic: This time its battlefield walking. The nucleus of a very interesting article, it suffers from stating the obvious (get a map, dress for muddy conditions) and coming up with a really interesting insight (how battlefield walks can enlighten your appreciation for unit frontages and manoeuvring difficulties) but only briefly at the end. A follow up 2 page article with photographs and maps would be good to see.

SULEIMAN'S STALINGRAD: A mainly historical article on the siege of Malta in 1565. Lots on the history, too light on the wargaming in my opinion. The author makes suggestions for games, but I'd have preferred something more substantial like a scenario and OOBs.

LAST POST FOR THE TOY SOLDIER GENERAL: A wonderful eulogy for Donald Featherstone. The first part is a tribute and a potted history of the man's work and character whilst the second part is a verbatim report and photos from the very first wargaming convention in 1961. This bit is mindblowing: 20 people all crammed into Chez Featherstone, catering by his wife and worries about where everyone will sleep. Some things remain familiar to modern readers (lucky dice rolling but the winner) and some parts alien (games broken up by lectures given by guest speakers). Some great photos of the tournament as well with everyone in blazers and ties and not a goth metal T shirt and army surplus trousers in sight!

WIENER PLANSPIELREGELN: One TMP'er on the other thread about this issue didn't like this article at all, it seems, but it follows on from the Featherstone one neatly as whilst he and Charles Grant were codifying the hobby in the UK, meanwhile over in Austria in the late 50s something similar was happening. I liked this article; it showed the hobby from a different world viewpoint and I had no idea about the Vienna group and the work of the Hahn family beforehand. You have to see the cardboard and tin flat Wehrmacht vehicles and figures of Herbert Hahn to believe them. Marders made from cardboard over 50 years ago looking both toy soldier-ish and amazing at the same time. After a description of the Vienna group, you get the WW2 rules they've been playing since the late 50s: Played on a grid system, they look (from the photos) again toy soldier-ish but the system shares a bit with games like Rapid Fire and Command Decision, although a bit more stylised with the grid system.

AT PLAY WITH CROOKED DICE: I'm biased here, as a die hard 7TV player who has met with the Crooked Dice team on many occasions and shared some excellent chats and gaming with them, but I hope this article gives their company and the 7TV system with its spin offs a big boost. If you haven't tried the game, read the article and then get on to SELWG next month to try a game.

RECCE: I like the review system where they list whether the games were actually played or just read through as it shows how much they were road tested. There's a mix of historical book reviews on the Zeebrugge raid of 1918, British aircraft carriers of WW2 and some Napoleonic topics but the main reviews are for Too Fat Lardies' Chain of Command (with a good description of the game mechanics), Dropzone Commander (saw it at Salute, admired the look of the game, narrowly avoided the pretty girl trying to sell me a copy) and a Crowning Mercy, which you'll remember had an article about that in the September issue of Wargames Illustrated.

SECRETS OF HORSE COLOURS: Thank you Henry; at last a chart of horse colours and now I know for sure what a Bay Dun is (A term I first heard in Bruce Quarrie's Napoleonic Campaigns book and I was completely in the dark about what colour that would be…pre-internet, see?). A simple and effective guide to cut out and keep next to your Horse and Musket books.

OVERALL: One for the long term enthusiast, this one. This issue is devoid of massed battles fought with trendy, newly released lines of figures using the latest glossy rules. It, more than recent issues, has a nostalgic feel to it with its scratchbuilding, battles with toy soldiers feel to it. The stuff about Donald Featherstone and the first wargames convention is priceless. I did miss the 3rd instalment of Henry's Salamanca series and there was no mention of when it will return either which is a shame because I really enjoyed the first two parts. The contrast between this issue of MW w/BG and the latest WI couldn't be starker. I'm not sure which one I prefer…vive le difference!

boy wundyr x26 Sep 2013 2:49 p.m. PST

Thanks for the review, I'll look to pick it up. The Featherstone article and horse colours in particular have my attention.

I tried to promote tie-wearing at our monthly club game last weekend, but got shot down as the ties would knock over the figures and terrain – I think I know why the sweaters and blazers were worn now! (we had a toast and tribute to DF instead)

Tin Soldier Man26 Sep 2013 11:07 p.m. PST

I agree with you, Neil Schuck is opinionated, and sometimes I agree with him, sometimes not. But I much prefer this approach to the rather bland "everything is so wonderful" approach you can get in review columns.

Maybe we need a Jeremy Clarkson figure to tell us how it is, straight from the hip. We can then make better informed decisions. Funnily enough, this fits in with the old MW motto which was something about being firmly independent. It now seems to truly be the case.

I really feel that MW and WSS are now constantly competing for the t spot in the hobby. WI is still very pretty, but the content is increasingly either Battlefront dominated, or it is just very bland general stuff which seems to be just space filling around the core marketing message. What a contrast to the ground breaking journal it was when Duncan MacFarlane launched it.

I know thus is sacrilege, but I wasn't too switched on by the lengthy tributes to Mr Featherstone, but I do understand why they were there. The Austrian WARGAMING piece was a bit weird as well.

Tin Soldier Man26 Sep 2013 11:10 p.m. PST

Oh, by the way Ubercommando, PLEASE keep these reviews coming. They are absolutely great. Funnily enough, I like them for the same reason I like Neil Schuck's approach. They are comprehensive and well considered but also you don't pull punches. Great work.

arthur181527 Sep 2013 2:46 a.m. PST

Ubercommando, yes, please continue with your reviews.

ubercommando27 Sep 2013 3:11 a.m. PST

Thank you guys, it's fun reading the magazines cover to cover and the upshot is I'm getting my money's worth!

If Neil Shuck is the Clarkson figure, then perhaps I'm Richard Hammond.

As for Battlefront domination of WI, apart from this month's issue, the FoW stuff often takes a back seat. You'll get a bit at the front about what new products are out there and most of the time there's only 1 article specifically for the game. If they've got a big release, then you'll see the FoW coverage increase but if not, then sometimes you won't get anything. Also, it is a HUGE magazine with tons of stuff in it. I'd say there's more games featuring Perry miniatures than anything else. But it is a new n' shiny magazine for the most part.

battleeditor27 Sep 2013 4:28 a.m. PST

Thanks for your very thorough review, ubercommando. And fear not, my Salamanca series returns shortly…

Henry

Volleyfire27 Sep 2013 1:40 p.m. PST

Have to agree with Tin Soldier Man I'm afraid. I too understand the need for a tribute to Mr Featherstone, but as an influence on my wargaming life he has had none. I can't say I've ever bought or read his books, nor as far as I can recall an article. The Austrian wargaming piece was skipped over after a quick glance, not my cup of tea at all, and neither are the DIY scenery/terrain articles, I prefer to save up and purchase ready made and preferably ready painted items as I haven't time to make my own. I agree that Mr Shuck is very much like Marmite, and I'm not fond of the stuff myself. Which is why I wonder when he already has a podcast which expounds his views that he gets two bites by appearing in print now as well? I'm not sure we do need a Mr Clarkson clone in wargaming publications as its not as big or commercial as the car industry, its still a cottage industry (with one exception in GW)by comparison.

arthur181527 Sep 2013 2:30 p.m. PST

Volleyfire, you may never have read any of Don Featherstone's books or articles yourself (perhaps the tribute might encourage you to do so), but – if you use any rules other than ones you have written yourself – I'll bet the authors of the rules you use have! GW rules, for example, owe many of their systems to his ideas.

The development of tabletop wargaming in this country was significantly influenced by his writing and one could also regard his Wargamer's Newsletter as the ancestor of all the magazines – both commercisl and amateur – that we enjoy today.

ubercommando27 Sep 2013 4:01 p.m. PST

One thing Neil Shuck mentioned in passing was the Sharpe TV series and how opinion is divided over the battle scenes. Personally, I give Sharpe a free pass as it gives an impression of Napoleonic warfare, but on an ITV budget in the 1990s that was about as good as you were going to get. Some of the films had up to 800 extras and most had between 300-500 but as I've discovered working on films you don't need that many to suggest a lot more as the camera can only fit so many into frame. The 1972 War And Peace series had 1500 extras by comparison. But I agree about The White Queen; it looks like they went for what they thought looked cool and threw the history entirely away. At least Sharpe didn't go that far.

Just Plain Chris28 Sep 2013 6:40 a.m. PST

Appreciate the time and effort it took to produce the review. It's not very often that one hears or reads about the positive aspects of hobby publications or articles. Like customer service, it seems too easy to find fault or problems and repeat these to anyone listening as opposed to talking about the good experiences.

I subscribe to three magazines (in alpha order – LONE WARRIOR, WARGAMES ILLUSTRATED, and MINIATURE WARGAMES with BATTLEGAMES) and enjoy – to one degree or another – reading them when they arrive. I also like trying to write for these magazines (albeit with varying degrees of success).

The piece about Austrian gaming certainly grabbed my attention, as I share a similar last name. The chances are remote, I know, for any kind of family history connection, but it would be interesting to find out more. Impetus enough to get back to work on researching the family tree.

GarrisonMiniatures28 Sep 2013 10:12 a.m. PST

Now that people have had a chance to go through the mag, one part of my article that didn't make it into the mag itself – presumably because it would have taken up more space than it warranted – were the 3 templates of the ship. I've therefore posted them as JPEG images on the Garrison website.

link ironclads – you will need to click on the gallery index at the top and scroll down to the Tealight Ironclads section.

These can be downloaded, resized to A4, and used, use the hull and decking printed double sided as shown in the article.

battleeditor28 Sep 2013 10:48 a.m. PST

@GarrisonMiniatures

Oops! My bad. I had meant to do just that and offer them as a download, so thank you!

Henry

GarrisonMiniatures28 Sep 2013 12:15 p.m. PST

Well. I think that if they bgo on the reiforcements page as well a lot more people will see them then will see them here or on Garrison!

Incidentally, if anyone wants the original MS Publisher versio of the deck file, I'll be happy to email it to them – that way you would be able to change the deck colour.

ubercommando28 Sep 2013 1:44 p.m. PST

I can also see a use for the tealight turrets for Victorian sci-fi games.

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP29 Sep 2013 6:59 a.m. PST

Excellent review, thanks!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.