Tango01  | 05 Sep 2013 10:42 a.m. PST |
Star Trek Into Darkness concept artist Neville Page has updated his website with lots of artwork, examining how he developed the look of the nuKlingons.
See much more here
link link Hope you enjoy!. Amicalement
Armand |
| tberry7403 | 05 Sep 2013 12:18 p.m. PST |
I guess the whatever happened that "…we don't talk about…" that Worf referred to happened a whole lot earlier in this Star Trek universe. And didn't exactly follow the same path. Tim |
| Bob Applegate | 05 Sep 2013 12:42 p.m. PST |
|
| StarfuryXL5 | 05 Sep 2013 2:08 p.m. PST |
You know, the Klingons as a race, and Khan and his crew, predate the split in the timeline. So in this new reality they should not be any different. Anything established prior to the arrival of that Romulan ship should remain unchanged. Not a very well thought out re-imagining. He must have had lens flares in his eyes distracting him when he was plotting the movies. |
| Katzbalger | 05 Sep 2013 2:40 p.m. PST |
You are assuming that the follow one movies were plotted at all. Rob |
| Zargon | 05 Sep 2013 2:56 p.m. PST |
Somehow the first Klingons from the original show appeal to me more, guys painted green in B grade 1960 TV just sounds like more fun than well.. Aliens that look like hi-tech armadillos needing lots of CGI and green screen visuals covering lame story lines, The big G stories were quite original and fun not a blow off of bad modern sci-fi TV.
Note there have been some good modern Sci fi but also a lot of bad.
Just think these klingons are too alien from the original Star Trek feel they don't come across as jocks full of testosterone but more shady and sinister creeps. Just my shake on it all.
BTW these guys would look good for some other project and would make great miniatures. cheers |
 Legion 4 | 05 Sep 2013 3:03 p.m. PST |
|
| Legion 4 | 05 Sep 2013 3:05 p.m. PST |
|
| Dan Wideman II | 05 Sep 2013 3:49 p.m. PST |
Well, at least I now know what they looked like. :) Between shaky-cam(TM) and Lens-flare cam (TM) I didn't see nearly enough of either ST movie. I lament the days when we could actually SEE what was on screen. Now it is all either shaky, flared, or dark. |
| Covert Walrus | 05 Sep 2013 10:34 p.m. PST |
So, they are like Pangolins? Makes a change . . . |
| optional field | 06 Sep 2013 7:00 a.m. PST |
I haven't seen the newest ST movie, but I did see the first of the Abrams's trek movie. While I agree they're good action movies, they don't feel very much like ST to me. IMHO they some of the 'look and feel' of later trek movies and shows, but none of the substance. This image just seems to confirm they're not placing great emphasis on the 'look and feel.' |
| billthecat | 07 Sep 2013 2:43 p.m. PST |
They need massive chainsaws and rending talons… |
