Sapeur | 03 Sep 2013 9:15 a.m. PST |
Not a repeat of my previous general question on standard bearers but specific to Brunswick. The figures I have are Perry's and it seems to my untrained eye that these are officers. Can someone clarify please? Thanks |
ColCampbell | 03 Sep 2013 10:27 a.m. PST |
Since they were created with British support, I would presume they used ensigns as standard bearers as the British army did. Jim |
Sapeur | 03 Sep 2013 11:17 a.m. PST |
Your logic seems very sound. Thank you. |
Hugh Johns | 03 Sep 2013 12:11 p.m. PST |
I would guess the Perrys erred. |
Edwulf | 03 Sep 2013 4:44 p.m. PST |
Ensigns were officers. So I guess the perry figures are ok. |
Hugh Johns | 03 Sep 2013 5:02 p.m. PST |
Only if you guess Brunswick ensigns carried the flag. |
Sapeur | 03 Sep 2013 10:28 p.m. PST |
I have spent a lot of time researching to find a statement, or picture, to confirm or deny that standard bearers were ensigns. I have not found anything at all. I think all logic is that they were. |
Supercilius Maximus | 04 Sep 2013 5:27 a.m. PST |
Not everything that the Brunswickers did was predicated on British practices – for example, the infantry battalions were composed of four large companies (each of four "zug"), rather than ten smaller ones. I would not assume that they had junior officers carrying the flags; more likely they were senior NCOs. |
Hugh Johns | 04 Sep 2013 7:54 a.m. PST |
|
Sapeur | 04 Sep 2013 2:20 p.m. PST |
Hi there Tried to follow your suggestion but, forgive an old codger, got a little lost with what was presented. Perhaps you would be good enough to clarify. Thanks |
Sapeur | 04 Sep 2013 2:46 p.m. PST |
A bit more detective work has shown that that for men and NCO's the pompom was about 100mm high conical shaped, blue over yellow. For officer's the pompom was again about 100mm, again was blue over yellow, but was an inverted conical shape wider at the top tapering down. Perry's and AB Miniatures show the officers shape. Not saying it is conclusive but more of a leaning towards officer. Please note I am only interested in the 3 No line regiments, not light or jager, who did not have a standard. References were Etling and Osprey MAA Series "The Black Brunswickers" by von Pivka. |
Prince of Essling | 04 Sep 2013 3:10 p.m. PST |
|
Sapeur | 04 Sep 2013 3:13 p.m. PST |
I think that is conclusive enough. I appreciate the information |
Flecktarn | 04 Sep 2013 3:22 p.m. PST |
Disposalman, In support of the Prince of Essling's post, the collection of the Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum indicates that standards were carried by sergeants. Jurgen |
Sapeur | 04 Sep 2013 3:29 p.m. PST |
Jurgen Appreciate your addition to the evidence. Tom |
huevans011 | 04 Sep 2013 3:49 p.m. PST |
The tradition in Germany was to give the standard to senior NCO's and not – as in England – to very young officers. |
Edwulf | 04 Sep 2013 4:32 p.m. PST |
Interesting! You learn something new everyday! |
Jemima Fawr | 04 Sep 2013 6:40 p.m. PST |
Not necessarily. The Prussians had a habit of giving them to a Frei-Korporal, who would often be a very young officer-candidate (much the same as a British Ensign in many respects). |
Old Contemptibles | 04 Sep 2013 10:50 p.m. PST |
There's a joke here somewhere. |
Supercilius Maximus | 05 Sep 2013 1:43 a.m. PST |
@RMD – In terms of his status, the Frei-Kaporal was more in the nature of the "gentleman volunteer" who served in the ranks until a vacancy appeared; there was already a rank of ensign among the company officers. @Disposalman – Bear in mind that if was not uncommon for the most senior NCOs (ie regimental and company sergeant majors) to have officer quality uniforms, so a "full" plume would not necessarily indicate an officer per se. |
Murvihill | 05 Sep 2013 9:31 a.m. PST |
"There's a joke here somewhere." You mean: "The Frei-Kaporal stood next to the batter-drummer so they could cook more quickly?" |
Sapeur | 05 Sep 2013 11:52 a.m. PST |
@ Supercilius Maximus – I am aware there could be all sorts of possibilities as to actual rank for a standard bearer, hence my original question and seeing how evidence came to light. Thanks for your comments |
Sapeur | 06 Sep 2013 1:55 a.m. PST |
Just to add to the mix;- Brunswick Troops 1809-1815 by Otto von Pivka [Osprey MAA 167] shows officer with standard. Die Fahnen Von Waterloo Heere & Waffen No 12 shows a sergeant. Has only 3 stripes not the colour sergeant badge of centjours. |
spontoon | 06 Sep 2013 5:53 p.m. PST |
Well, that must be the reason I've only painted the Leib battalion, who carried no colours! |
Sapeur | 06 Sep 2013 11:36 p.m. PST |
"No pain no gain" that way!! |
seneffe | 07 Sep 2013 3:59 p.m. PST |
I think the good people at Cent-Jours might be over interpreting the term 'Fahnen-Sergeant' into the actual standard bearer. I think it's more likely to be just the colour sergeants- the NCOs charged with protecting the actual standard bearer from attack as in the British Army- think the rank badge is similar too. FWIW, I would think that the actual person who carried the colour was either a very junior officer as per British/KGL, or a young officer-aspirant with nominal NCO rank as per the German tradition- a young gentlemen anyway. |
Sapeur | 07 Sep 2013 11:00 p.m. PST |
seneffe What has made this little study interesting is the 'possibilities'. Not just for this topic but so many of the uniforms of the period. Keeps the mind active I think. |