Help support TMP


"Great Source of Wargames" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Solo Wargamers Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Napoleonics Scenarios Message Board

Back to the Campaign Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


2,109 hits since 11 Aug 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

thistlebarrow211 Aug 2013 6:17 a.m. PST

In the past I have commented on what good wargames my PBEM campaign produces. I am pleased to report that if anything they are getting better.

I appreciate that a campaign is only interesting to those taking part, but I must confess that I have been a little disappointed at the apparent lack of outside interest in my PBEM campaign. It has been running nonstop for four years, which must be pretty unusual if not something of a record.

The main reason for my disappointment is that it is such a great source of wargames that I wish I could spread the word more and get others to try something similar.

Of course it is quite possible that there are many wargamers out there running their own campaign and getting just as much enjoyment out of it. But I doubt if they are PBEM campaigns, because there is the constant need to replace commanders and I don't see how they could do that without asking for them across the popular forums.

The wargame which prompted me to write about this subject is the latest in our 1814 campaign. It started as one of those battles which hardly seem worth Wargaming because the odds are so uneven. It started with four French corps against two Bavarian corps. A third Bavarian corps would arrive at the start of move 5 and a fourth at the start of move 9. Each wargame only lasts 12 moves, so the outcome seemed obvious.

At the end of move 7 the French were about to overrun the two Bavarian corps. At the end of move 12 both sides have lost heavy casualties, both have lost more than half of their infantry brigades to rout. It all hinges on hand to hand fighting in the central village. The melee has gone on for three moves, each of them a draw. One brigade is B class, the other C class, but casualties evened out the difference. B now has 30% casualties, C has 20%. It's a miracle that either are still fighting.

The Bavarians have lost the northern half of the table; the French have lost the southern half. Both are pretty well fought to a standstill.

Who would have thought that such an uneven battle could run the full twelve moves and still need one more to decide the winner!

So if any of you reading this post have not tried fighting a campaign I would urge you to do so without delay. For those of you solo wargamers, who find it difficult to motivate yourself, then do please try PBEM. They can be frustrating and thankless, but the credit far outweighs the debit.

Caliban11 Aug 2013 10:20 a.m. PST

Completely agree – campaigns are the way to go if you have the capability and the stamina!

Bob the Temple Builder11 Aug 2013 1:06 p.m. PST

I always think the battles are to campaigns as chapters are to a book; they can stand alone but are much better when put together.

Larry R12 Aug 2013 5:20 a.m. PST

PBEM?

rabbit12 Aug 2013 5:52 a.m. PST

Larry

could be

PbeM Play by e-mail as against Play by Post PbP

Problem I find with campaigns is they tend to potter around for a while, there is one massive battle then it all falls apart. Althouh our last umpire was as organised as Berthier, and kept the campaign going for years.

rabbit

thistlebarrow212 Aug 2013 9:01 a.m. PST

Larry

PBEM = Play By E Mail. All campaign communication is by email

thistlebarrow212 Aug 2013 9:07 a.m. PST

rabbit

I had a similar problem with the two campaigns I took part in as a player. Both went really well until the first battle, both then ended without it being fought.

I suspect this is because the campaign was based on a historical campaign, using historical orders of battle, and without any consideration of how it would be transferred to the wargames table.

I planned my campaign from the wargames table and the number and types of figures available. One map square equals the wargames table. I ensured that it would be possible to fight a wargame using both sides full order of battle.

Then it is an easy matter to transfer the map battle to the wargames table, and back again.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.