Help support TMP


"Hypothetical in Lebanon 1983" Topic


22 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the Modern What-If Message Board


Action Log

02 Aug 2013 8:07 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from "Hypothetical in Lebannon 1983" to "Hypothetical in Lebanon 1983"

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

MiG Hunters


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

AK47 15mm Militia with Rifles

The first militia for the AK47 "opposing army."


Featured Workbench Article

Painting More of the Corporate Babes

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian says he's pretty happy with these babes...


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


1,388 hits since 2 Aug 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

PVT64102 Aug 2013 6:01 a.m. PST

I'm building my Moderns around a hypothetical scenario set in Lebannon in 1983 after the Beirut bombing of the Marine Barracks. The US launches it's War on Terror in response. I have painted up a brigade of Soviet Airborne and Naval Infantry to support their Syrian Allies who ofcourse are supporting the terrorist elements in Lebanon. I have done a brigade of US Marines and the 82nd arirborne aling with a little supporting Lebanese troops. Currently wotking on a brigade of the french equivalent of the rapid deployment force as I have them become involved due to their embassy and barracks bombings. My thought is that in an effort to keep the situation from spreading, the US does not attack shipments of Soviet armor by sea to Syria or they were sent when things started going south but before all heck broke loose. After my French I want to do a Soviet Armored brigade. In such a scenario I am assuming that it is sent from the reserves around the Kiev area of the Soviet Union. My question is what type tank do you all believe would be the best in those areas and what would be the most likely to be sent?

Old Slow Trot02 Aug 2013 6:39 a.m. PST

T-62's mostly but I think possibly a contingent of T-72's(company to short batallion strength) might've been delivered for backup and to act as a shock element.

PVT64102 Aug 2013 6:42 a.m. PST

Do you think that they would have pulled anything better out of Europe to send as a special deployment? T64/T80?

PVT64102 Aug 2013 6:49 a.m. PST

I also figure BMP1 vs. BMP2s as the BMP2 would have only been in services 2-3 years. Thoughts?

Mako1102 Aug 2013 9:35 a.m. PST

Not sure, but imagine as noted above, T-62s and T-72s (I believe there's a specific export model for the latter).

Would probably need to land them via ship, before the USA intervened, since otherwise a naval blockade would probably be in place to prevent further Soviet resupply by sea.

Irish Marine02 Aug 2013 11:45 a.m. PST

They would probably stage in Syria and drive in.

Gaz004502 Aug 2013 12:01 p.m. PST

I would have suggested T55's……..I don't think the Sovs would strip anything from the DDR in '83. Same for troops from USSR-Chinese border…..
T55's would be supported by spares and tech staff in Syria familiar with them and they have a proven Third World durability in harsh conditions and handling…….also the Sovs had a big pile of them to ship out!
Maybe BTR series apc's rather than BMP's for durability and availability….all the good stuff earmarked for Europe and other 1st line units?
Maybe some Warpac 'volunteer' formations ,Poles or Bulgarians for some more flavour!!?

Louie N02 Aug 2013 1:14 p.m. PST

What are the possibilities of airlifting Soviet armored reinforcements if the sea lanes are closed?

Personal logo optional field Supporting Member of TMP02 Aug 2013 3:53 p.m. PST

Lebanon is mountainous and not terribly suited for tanks. On the other hand the Soviets were quick to send Airborne units to Afghanistan, and those veterans would probably have been the first to ship out to the Middle East. Naval Infantry would probably also have been likely to be sent in as well.

Mako1102 Aug 2013 5:21 p.m. PST

You can land BMDs, and their other light assault guns (ASU-85s) via aircraft.

I know they landed the BMDs in Afghanistan, when they invaded there, and seized the airports. They may have flown in ASU-85s as well – I seem to recall seeing a pic or two of those, but can't recall for sure, since its been almost 35 years since that occurred.

Yep, naval infantry would have the BTR-60s, plus tank support.

PVT64105 Aug 2013 9:14 a.m. PST

I've got the paras and Naval Infantry. Looking for an excuse to field stonger armor units. I like the idea of a Bulgarian volunteer unit as they were the most politicaly reliable of the pact. Maybe a battalion of T-72, Brigade of T-62 and a brigade of T-55 with BTR-60's or BMP1s.

Irish and Mako my thoughts exactly.

PVT64113 Nov 2013 10:21 a.m. PST

Additional thoughts requested. US 24th Mech Infantry 1983. M60/M113 or M1/M2?

Gaz004513 Nov 2013 1:55 p.m. PST

I would guess at M60/M113 ,Because-
'The US Army Europe border operations history at p221
states: "On 10 August 1983 Troop A of the 1st Squadron of the 11th
ACR unloaded 12 of the new Abrams M1 tanks and became the first
USAREUR cavalry unit to receive the new main battle tank. The 2d ACR
was scheduled to begin receiving M1s in 1984."'
By August 82 only 612 Abrams had been accepted for service in total……the M60 was still the MBT in Europe in '83.
24 Inf Div fielded lots of M113's to the desert in '91 Desert Storm too.

PVT64114 Nov 2013 7:23 a.m. PST

Perfect info thanks!

kabrank15 Nov 2013 6:53 a.m. PST

Note Syria has small numbers of T72 in 1982 during the Israel Peace In Galilee operation.

Hence T72 could be supported via Syria if need be.

PVT64115 Apr 2014 10:21 a.m. PST

Maybe I'll include a Libyan "volunteer" force.

Gaz004516 Apr 2014 9:56 a.m. PST

Those guys were everywhere in the Eighties…….you could have a 'Red' foreign legion with the aforementioned Bulgarians and various eastern European elements-throw in Cubans (Moscows 'proxy' army of choice !) and Libyans too………'elite' formations like paratroops/commandos and maybe a volunteer armoured brigade made up of a battalion from each of the above…….lots of variety.

PVT64117 Apr 2014 5:23 a.m. PST

All great ideas!

PVT64118 Apr 2014 12:52 p.m. PST

Just ordered some of the figures for Bulgarians. Will do a reserve tank Regt. with attachments. T34/85s and SU-100s. Airsupport of Mig-17 and IL-28. Using the premese that front line stuff is kept at home.

PVT64127 Mar 2015 8:31 a.m. PST

Update: For the Soviets, I did a brigade in T-62 and a brigade in T-62, plus one battalion of T-64 for "real world" testing along with a battaion of BMP-1. I have now started the US 24th Mech. Infantry with M-60 & M113. The French are all done. Had taken a break from Moderns but am becoming interested in them again. Re-reading "The Root" for motivation.

Tgunner29 Mar 2015 3:42 p.m. PST

Strategy and Tactics magazine put out a game called Central Command back in 1983ish. It has a great article about US and Soviet forces coming to blows in Iran. It has a very useful chart on equipment types and forces available for actions in the Mideast. It's still fairly easy to get on EBay and there is a free version on Scribe.
auction

You got the 24th Mech right. It was M60A3 and M113 based according to S&T.

PVT64130 Mar 2015 11:49 a.m. PST

Thanks Tgunner!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.