Help support TMP


"Campaign in Southern Italy and Sicily 1050-1100" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

God's Acre


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Infantry

wodger Fezian begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.


Featured Profile Article

Crusader Jerusalem

Our man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.


Featured Movie Review


2,956 hits since 20 Apr 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Whirlwind21 Apr 2013 3:49 a.m. PST

Which armies/troops would you need to wargame this campaign, and do sufficient of the right troops exist in 6mm at the moment?

Regards

Griefbringer21 Apr 2013 4:19 a.m. PST

I have no idea what models are available in 6 mm. However, for the historical factions involved you might want to consider at least the following:

- Italo-Lombards
- Papal states
- Byzantines
- Sicilian Muslims
- Italo-Normans
- Holy Roman Emperor

Also, some of these factions were a bit factionalised themselves, for example Norman barons had a habit of rebelling against their overlord every now and then. Plus many of the cities were also rather independently minded, and could rebel against their nominal overlords if they thought they could get away with it.

Whirlwind21 Apr 2013 4:56 a.m. PST

Are all these factions very distinctive in dress and equipment? Bearing in mind I'll be playing 6mm of course.

Regards

SteelonSand21 Apr 2013 6:55 a.m. PST

My two pence worth in following up Griefbringer's excellent list above would be to look at Baccus' new Norman and Crusades Saracens ranges – I think with differing paint schemes, they should cover most Frankish/Norman and Muslim troops of the time.

LorenzoMele21 Apr 2013 8:50 a.m. PST

I have run a campaign set in Southern Italy and Sicily using very simple rules.
May be you can find it inspirational
Here the rules
link
and here the campaign development
link

Cerdic21 Apr 2013 9:33 a.m. PST

Yes, have a look at Baccus. Their Normans are perfect for what you want and are excellent figures. They paint up really nice! As mentioned above, they are about to be joined by a Saracen range.

Druzhina22 Apr 2013 5:06 p.m. PST
Great War Ace23 Apr 2013 7:39 p.m. PST

I did a campaign on this once years ago. Simplified down to these player mixes:

Two players: one Norman, one Lombard/Papal/Byzantine, taking turns with each, starting with the Byzantine first, then Lombard and finally Papal, then returning to Byzantine. It works, sort of.

Three players: one Norman, one Papal/Byzantine, one Lombard.

Four plus players: add on more Lombards and more Normans.

Add on Muslim "pirates" to instill further chaos.

Once southern Italy is more or less consolidated, the Normans get into Sicily, and you shift gears and have Muslim powers, up to four of them, also not united as the Normans begin their expansion. We did not get that far.

The object of course is to replay the Norman expansion, at the expense of the locals. The Normans do best if they cooperate. That goes too for the Lombards, but the reality was that the Lombard dukes did not cooperate, and the Normans did more or less, even while being rivals in the land grab….

Druzhina24 Apr 2013 12:51 a.m. PST
greenknight4 Sponsoring Member of TMP24 Apr 2013 8:59 a.m. PST

Take alook at my campaign book on the Normans.

The Norman Conquests, covers the Normans in Eurpope and Italy.

Chris Parker

link

Great War Ace24 Apr 2013 10:21 a.m. PST

Fifty pages, twenty dollars, *whistle!*

Druzhina24 Apr 2013 9:50 p.m. PST
Lewisgunner25 Apr 2013 8:40 a.m. PST

ThebFatimid stuff is really interesting, particularly the mailshirts that seem to be waist length only. The other interest is the deep shields. Are these or hunting only or or war?

The Byzantine ivory boxes are IMO too classicised to be much use as 11th century source. The panel with the bare chested trousered barbarians is a decade give away.

Controversially, I also doubt the Pechenegs. I didn't used to and there is some interesting later evidence showing a Hungarian wearing long loose over trousers that looks to fall in just the same way as the costume on the BC. Plus the dress is very like those illustrations of Cumans fromn14th century Hungarian chronicles. Oh go on then I'll believe them.

Druzhina25 Apr 2013 8:54 p.m. PST

A hunter would have little need for armour and shield, so I would assume they are the normal gear of a soldier (who is hunting). Would an ordinary footman have 2 sets of armour?


Here is my collection of Cuman and Hungarian Soldiers in the Saint Ladislaus legend for comparison.

Druzhina
Illustrations of Soldiers

Whirlwind21 Oct 2013 9:50 p.m. PST

Thanks very much for all the great info.

Regards

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.