| Sergeant Paper | 11 Apr 2013 3:49 p.m. PST |
Quoth Bill,
you could always go to the TMP Poll Suggestions board and start a mass movement in support of that The question: Would you support adding an Outbox function for PMs?
Yes – what a great idea!
No – I see no need for this, because I never forget. The reason I rise to propose this is that right now you can never read what you've sent to somebody else, once you post it. A minor bother, perhaps, but isn't it always the niggles that get the most irritating eventually? |
| John the OFM | 11 Apr 2013 3:51 p.m. PST |
Yes I would.
It is very annoying to get a PM that only replies without a quote and I can't remember what I said.  |
| Maddaz111 | 11 Apr 2013 3:51 p.m. PST |
|
 20thmaine  | 11 Apr 2013 3:56 p.m. PST |
|
 MrHarold  | 11 Apr 2013 4:05 p.m. PST |
Yes, we need a PM outbox… i've had several times where I needed to look up an old PM that I had sent, but was unable too.
ALSO, when replying is there any way to keep the "RE:" to only one time, instead of adding extra "RE:"s
For example… after a back and forth my message subject becomes: RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Message |
| doc mcb | 11 Apr 2013 4:09 p.m. PST |
|
| GaryRP | 11 Apr 2013 4:11 p.m. PST |
Sounds like a useful feature. I would vote yes. |
| rmcaras | 11 Apr 2013 4:14 p.m. PST |
YES, please! and while your at it some basic message control, such as selecting and deleting without having to open up each message, scroll to the bottom & deleting. |
| Jakar Nilson | 11 Apr 2013 4:45 p.m. PST |
Sounds like a no-brainer… |
| abelp01 | 11 Apr 2013 5:02 p.m. PST |
|
| Oh Bugger | 11 Apr 2013 5:17 p.m. PST |
|
| richarDISNEY | 11 Apr 2013 6:08 p.m. PST |
Double plus good!
 |
| korsun0 | 11 Apr 2013 6:09 p.m. PST |
You can delete the "Re" in the title each time…. A good idea I think. The features would depend a lot on the code and the capability I suppose but some sort of archive would be useful. Same with old Market Place posts, when I search I only get back a few results…. |
| jerardad | 11 Apr 2013 6:16 p.m. PST |
|
| Sergeant Paper | 11 Apr 2013 6:51 p.m. PST |
And 'Yes, please.' from me too. |
| War Panda | 11 Apr 2013 7:07 p.m. PST |
Yes and immediately please (or sooner if you like) |
| SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 11 Apr 2013 7:23 p.m. PST |
I find myself in agreement with all in favor!
Yes! |
| FusilierDan | 11 Apr 2013 7:53 p.m. PST |
|
| Charles Marlow | 11 Apr 2013 7:54 p.m. PST |
I'm in favour of the purposed new function. |
| Midpoint | 11 Apr 2013 8:13 p.m. PST |
|
| Mapleleaf | 11 Apr 2013 8:19 p.m. PST |
|
| Cyrus the Great | 11 Apr 2013 9:16 p.m. PST |
|
| plutarch 64 | 12 Apr 2013 2:43 a.m. PST |
I think I may have sent you a PM on this earlier, Sergeant, but I'm not sure now. Yes, great idea. |
| galvinm | 12 Apr 2013 4:21 a.m. PST |
Yes! When you get to be my age and condition, you don't remember anything. What were we talking about? |
 etotheipi | 12 Apr 2013 4:51 a.m. PST |
|
| Chris Rance | 12 Apr 2013 5:43 a.m. PST |
|
| Doug em4miniatures | 12 Apr 2013 6:42 a.m. PST |
Since my post started this TMP link I must say "yes indeedy".
How does this poll stuff work? (I opted out of polls years ago). Doug |
| Tommy20 | 12 Apr 2013 7:49 a.m. PST |
|
| The Tin Dictator | 12 Apr 2013 9:12 a.m. PST |
Yes.
Also, I'd like to be able to delete multiple messages at once rather than only one at a time. |
| Rrobbyrobot | 12 Apr 2013 10:07 a.m. PST |
|
| BigNickR | 12 Apr 2013 8:20 p.m. PST |
|
 Rebel Minis | 14 Apr 2013 7:49 p.m. PST |
|
| John the Greater | 15 Apr 2013 6:07 a.m. PST |
I say yes. Though I was tempted to vote no just to be contrary. |
| Uesugi Kenshin | 15 Apr 2013 5:48 p.m. PST |
|
