"Stamper Class Grav MBT - Dirtside Stats" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Dirtside Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Well, they're certainly cheap...
Featured Workbench Article DJD Miniatures runs amok with a diorama of cavemen and the giant prehistoric armadillo!
Featured Profile Article Using AI to generate some concept art of the Hive Mind (insect army) homeworld.
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 05 Apr 2013 5:30 p.m. PST |
Another anti-grav vehicle from Irregular, NSF2 in their catalog: link
36mm long, with a five-faceted hull front with some kind of panels; turret with two small-caliber guns, and a "dome" on the back of the turret. To me, this is Large (class 4). I don't know what the front panels are about, but "ablative" sounds good, and maybe throw in some ECM. I interpreted the "dome" on a sister vehicle as targeting systems, so might as well do so again. One possibility: Equipment Item VSP : BVP Spaces Cost
Vehicle, class 4 20 : 0 20 20
Armor class 4, Ablative 20 : 38 20 38
Fusion Generation Plant 20 : 38 20 61
Anti-Gravity 20 : 38 20 99
1 class 5 MDC in
Full traverse turret 20 : 38 5 149
with Superior fire control 20 : 38 5 179
1 class 2 RFAC in
Full traverse turret 20 : 38 1 189
1 APSW 20 : 38 1 189
Basic ECM 20 : 38 1 204 |
| kreoseus2 | 06 Apr 2013 3:04 p.m. PST |
Maybe count the panels as an APFC belt as you have a spare capacity point left ? |
| Editor in Chief Bill | 06 Apr 2013 7:44 p.m. PST |
Since grav vehicles are considered to be floating a few meters above the surface, I wasn't sure APFC made sense for the front panels, which would be upwards-facing. |
|
