"Smooth & Rifled Rules?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century
American Civil War
19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Celebrating another milestone with my Union army.
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| monger | 22 Jan 2013 1:43 p.m. PST |
Anyone else play these rules (by the designers of Imetus)? I had a pretty good game over the weekend trying the new 1.5 version out. Battle Report on YouTube Pretty good over-all. Just curious what others have to say about them, perhaps compared to other rules like BAB and such. |
| michaelsbagley | 22 Jan 2013 5:19 p.m. PST |
I've bought the rules with the intent to use them…. But between painting the minis I plan to use going slower than planned, and my recent side track into the X-Wing mini game, I have not used the rules yet. I have read the rules through, and like most of the concepts. I really like the component angle for adding period flair. I worry about action points bogging the game down though…. But between the three different rulesets I have bought and read, I think the upsides to this ruleset outweigh the negatives more than the other two. |
| Brooklyn Wargamer | 22 Jan 2013 5:51 p.m. PST |
Does it involve cards? I don't like rules using cards… |
| monger | 22 Jan 2013 7:10 p.m. PST |
LoL… no. No cards Armchair. Card FREE! Once you get the hang of the system, game play moves along pretty quickly actually. It has some good ideas… has a few issues here and there, but that is mostly due to it still being an 'early' version of the rules (although it's in 1.5, and has been around a bit). To me, I think it's worth the effort. SO far I have been talking with the designer, and he is fully behind feedback from players. So it has a lot of potential. |
| Brooklyn Wargamer | 22 Jan 2013 8:19 p.m. PST |
|
|
snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.
