Help support TMP


"Swedish Armies of the XVI Century" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Tin Soldiers in Action


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Crossbowmen 1410

The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Infantry

wodger Fezian begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


Featured Book Review


2,785 hits since 8 Jan 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Don Sebastian08 Jan 2013 2:41 p.m. PST

First of all, I'd like to say that the only sources I have on the swedish armies of tha century are the George Gush book on renaissance armies, and the yahoo scandinavian wars group, so pelase excuse me if the questions are silly:

1) When did the Swedish stopped using peasant militia infantry (the Crossbow and Polearm commonly depicted on the War of Liberation depictions) and started to use "regular" pike and arquebus companies?
2)Up to when did the Swedish Gendarmes use barded horses?
3)Also, what kinds of cavalry other than Gendarmes and Demi Lancers did the swedish employ? On yahoo groups, I've seen references to 3 kinds of armor being worn on the 1560s ("köritz", "drabbtyg" and "skyttetyg"), and by the name of the last one (which apparently means "shooters armour", I'm guessing they had some kind of reiter/mounted arquebusiers cavalry. Is hat correct?

Any help would be welcome.

Khazarmac08 Jan 2013 3:19 p.m. PST

Don, there is some info on army composition in the relevant Swedish army lists in eg. FOG-R 'Clash of Empires' and DBR army lists vol 2. See if you can find someone local with one of those.

Daniel S08 Jan 2013 3:29 p.m. PST

The FoG & DBR army lists are highly inaccurate and misleading as far as the historical facts are concerned Who ever wrote can have not looked at even the most basic sources on the subject, probably due to the language barrier which has resulted in lists which are more fiction that fact.

Phillius Sponsoring Member of TMP08 Jan 2013 3:32 p.m. PST

Isn't that true of most of the army lists in those books?

jefritrout08 Jan 2013 3:45 p.m. PST

It is most certainly true of the Colonial Portuguese. Especially those that fought in Brazil against the Dutch.

But knowing Daniel, I would trust anything he says about the Swedish army of the Renaissance era.

Khazarmac08 Jan 2013 3:58 p.m. PST

I bow to your superior knowledge gents.

badger2208 Jan 2013 5:47 p.m. PST

Which is why every chance I get on which ever forum or list the chance comes up to try and convince daniel he needs to write several books in English to cover so many of these things. A good one just on the Thirtyyears war would be outstandg. And there are so many others he could cover as well.

owen

Daniel S08 Jan 2013 6:04 p.m. PST

The evolution of the Swedish army is more complex than a simple move from "milita" with crossbows & polearms to regulars with arquebus & pike.

1525-1542 you had peasant & yeomen serving with crossbows either as levies or recruited as volunteers together with a small force of "regulars" supplied mainly by the German-Swedish "Stockholmsfänikan", (The Stockholm Company) which was patterned on the landsknechts but was mostly shot (15-30 pike & halberd depending on the year)

In addition German Landsknechts were hired for campaigns or to serve for a time as regular troops.

The Dacke Feud of 1542-1543 saw an increased focus on crossbow and arquebus and from 1544 onward the number of native regulars rose while the number of German soldiers declined. The most common weapon was the crossbow as it was often supplied by the soldiers themselves and they had ample experience in it's use.

The outbreak of war with Muscovy in 1554 forced the Swedish troops to rearm. The Swedish regulars sent to Finland were issued with arquebus as well as pikes, halberd and armour when these became available. Still firearms & crossbows were the main weapons of 70-80% of the men.

In 1561 The new Swedish King Erik XIV set about reforming the Swedish army in order to turn it into a modern force patterned after the continental armies. The infantry was organised into four regiments (5000 men each), one of marines, one of arquebusiers and two of pike & shot supported by targeteers.

The start of the war with Denmark in 1563 saw the army suffer from a shortage of weapons & armour and crossbows were issued from old stores and new ones purchased from peasants & yeomen to arm all of the men. Most however carried arquebus, halberd or pike. Once the Swedish navy broke the blockade it was possible to import arms & armour and the crossbows were phased out.

The 'heavy' pike and armour associated with it (all Swedish pikemen were issued armour) was unpopular with most Swedish soldiers and after 1570 their use was abandoned. Swedish infantry units now came in two flavours, either a mixture of arquebusiers & halberdiers or made up of arquebusiers only. This remained the typical weaponry of the Swedish infantry until 1600, for short periods of time pikes & armour was reintroduce such as in the 1580's when Pontus De la Gardie rearmed 20% of the men in some units with pikes but on the whole firearms were the most common weapon together with a small number of halberds.

Daniel S09 Jan 2013 4:23 a.m. PST

There were 4 sources of Swedish cavalry

The Royal household cavalry
The "Hovfana" provided the king with a standing force of cavalry which both served in the field and provided a mounted escort during peacetime travels. (The Drabant bodyguards were too few to provide proper security on the road and were not trained in the use of the lance or crossbow/arquebus)The Hovfana was 200-300 strong and was at first armoured lancers with a small number of mounted crossbowmen.

Erik XIV greatly expaned the household troops by adding several new units. The "White" made up of lancers and the "Black" made up of Reiter style cavalry. (The colour refered to the colour of their armour) These units were disbanded after Erik lost the civil war in 1568 as they had remained loyal to the end.

Before 1563 the use of the lance is unclear, it seems that the lance was still used at least up to the 1540's and instructions issued durint the war with Muscovy shows that at least on paper it was in use in the 1550's but how the men really fought is not known.
The lance was not used in combat during the war of 1563-1570, the troops left the lances in storage and fought with pistol, sword and an assortment of warhammers and maces.

A little studied part of the Household cavalry is the Ducal companies, the younger sons of Gustav I were granted various dukedoms and they each raised a company of ducal houshold cavalry. Becaus they were outside royal control we don't have much documentation about them.

The Noble levy
A Swedish noblemans status and priviliges depended on his providing the Crown with armed service. In theory failure to do so would result in being stripped of noble rank, in practice this was seldom done. Erik XIV was the only one who strongly enforced that rule and he ended up with a revolt and civil war that cost him his crown.

Based on ones income and wealth you had to provide a certain number of armed horsemen, the poorest gentry would serve in person while the great magnates were to supply small bands of well armed retainers. The early muster rolls from 1529 show that few men served in full armour, most were mounted crossbowmen in half armour who could use short lance in addition to the crossbow. But by the later 1530's this had changed and the majority of the noble levy was armoured lancers with only 20-25% of the men serving as mounted crossbowmen.

Pistols began to be added to the equipment in the 1540's and like the Houshold cavalry the lances were not used in the 1563-1570 war with Denmark.

Armed service was expensive and therefore unpopular with the nobility who frequently argued with the Crown about the regulations for armed service. Gustav I walked a middle road and used a stick and carrot approach to get a decent force but not enforcing the full extent of the law.

Erik XIV demanded that the nobility fullfill all of their obligations which resulted in a 50% increase in the number of cavalry raised by the nobility, several hundred families unable or unwilling to provide armed service found themselves stripped of noble rank. The end result was that the nobility rallied around Eriks younger brothers when they revolted against the King in 1568.

Johan III who usurped the throne greatly reduced the armed service demanded from the nobilty, in practice the Swedish noble levy was allowed to go unmustered and unused until the final years of the 16th Century and their military value declined accordingly. Only the nobility of Finland continued to see active service as Sweden became involved in a 25-year war with Muscovy over the possesion of current day Estonia and northern Livonia.

The Regulars
The Dacke Feud of 1542-1543 had showed that the Houshold cavalry and Noble levy were too few in numbers to be able to fight on several fronts. As a result the army reform of 1544 saw Gustav I begin to raise companies of regular cavalry recruited from volunteers.

At first they served as mounted crossbowmen but despite their cost pistols and wheellock arquebus began to spread to these units as well. New research seems to suggest that the spread of firearms was not as rapid as older sources have suggested and despite Erik XIV turning the regulars into copies of the German Reiters & Pferdschützen on paper units still made surprisnlgy large use of crossbows in 1564 during the war with Denmark.

But firearms won out in the end and the regular Swedish cavalry rode to battle with a mix of pistols & wheellock arquebus in the last decades of the 16th C.

The armour worn is not easy to determine, it seems that a form of half armour was supposed to have been worn in the same style that was used by the mounted crossbowmen of the household cavalry and noble levy. For the 1560's whe have better documentation and it is clear that German style "Trabharnisch" were supposed to be worn. Most men would probably have worn only the simplest form with helmet, breast & backplates and mail sleeves. This simple form of armour continued to be used in the war with Muscovy 1570-1595 but the Swedish cavalry became increasingly unarmoured and at one point some units were issued with infantry armours to given them some protection. But in the end armour seems to have almost completly disappeared since it was not precived to been needed. This would cause a lot of problems when fighting the Poles in the early 17th Century

Kadrinazi09 Jan 2013 7:47 a.m. PST

As always great info Daniel, thanks for sharing!

Daniel S09 Jan 2013 3:52 p.m. PST

The fever made me forget the 4th type of cavalry in Swedish service

The Mercenaries
Large scale recruitment of foreign cavalry began first in the 1560's, in Estonia and Livonia the Swedes were able to recruit both unemployed German mercenaries and local units raised from the Baltic-German nobility and it's retainers. These all served as Reiter style cavalry.

A second and somewhat surprising source for cavalry recruits was Scotland which supplied the Swedish crown with men for serveral cavalry units in the 1560's and 1570's.
The mecenaries turned out to be expensive so most were disbanded in the late 1570's, renewed warfare with the muscovites in the 1590's saw new units being raised. Despite their cost and the many problems they caused the King's of Sweden seemed unwilling to go without the services of the Germans in times of war. But when the war with Muscovy finaly ended in 1595 all mercenary units were disbanded and no new ones were raise until the 17th Century

Griefbringer10 Jan 2013 2:12 p.m. PST

The FoG & DBR army lists are highly inaccurate and misleading as far as the historical facts are concerned Who ever wrote can have not looked at even the most basic sources on the subject, probably due to the language barrier which has resulted in lists which are more fiction that fact.

I am still wondering where the DBR authors came up with the idea of fitting an option for reindeer-riding Samish light cavalry to all of the Swedish lists.

That said, British authors tend to have some sort of obsession with reindeers when it comes to northern Europe. I can recall certain Winter War supplement from Two Fat Lardies, in which the only draft animals for artillery that they bothered to list were reindeers.

But back to the topic: Daniel, what Swedish language publications would you recommend when it comes to 16th century Swedish military organisation?

Daniel S19 Jan 2013 7:20 a.m. PST

Griefbringer,
With regards to sources one has to read more than a few to get a good picture of the period.

Much of the published material suffer from the usual problems of the period they were written in, early 20th Century sources tend to have a "heroic" view of history and less pleasant fact may be downplayed or left out. For example it was not until I started going through the archives that I found out that the firearms shortage in 1563-1564 had forced the Swedes to use crossbows as an emergency solution. The published studies presented the army's equipment as it should have been rather than as it was.

You will also encounter the problems caused by for example the very rigid notions of "fire" and "shock" that were common in the early 20th C. So cavalry armed with firearms tend to be rather misunderstood.

Some wars are very poorly studied by later historians, for example the Russo-Swedish war of 1570-1595 has only been studied in depth by single historian and unless you read Finnish you will not be able to make use of his work.

Afhandling om svenska krigsmagtens och krigskonstens tilstånd, ifrån konung Gustaf I död till konung Gustaf Adolphs anträde till regeringen
Carl Adlersparre (Stockholm 1792)
Also printed in "Kungliga Vitterhets, Historie och Antiquites academiens Handlingar III" (Stockholm 1793)
Yes, the date is correct it is indeed a 18th Century book. Adlersparre's thesis is a remarkable piece of work as his method of research and writing were very 'modern' for the time. He even footnoted many of the documents he used, something which was not standard even a 100 years later. Can be found free online, IIRC I got my copy from archive.org by searching for the Kungliga Vitterhets (…)

Axtorna en studie i organisation och taktik
In "Meddelanden från Krigsarkivet IV" (Stockholm 1926)
Lots of good information about the army of Erik XIV in this indepth study of the largest field battle during the Nordic seven years war. Also includes more than a few examples of early 20th misconceptions and misunderstandings about the period but still a very valuable source.

Kungl. Svea Livgardes historia I, 1523-1560
Kungl. Svea Livgardes historia II, 1560-1611
Bertil C:Son Barkman (Stockholm 1937 & 1939)
Barkman wrote much more than a regiment history of the Royal Guard, in effect he wrote an extensive military history of the wars which Sweden took part in during the 16th Century.

Gustav Vasas ryska krig 1554-1557
Arvo Viljanti (Stockholm 1957)
Only just got a copy of this two volume work which seems to be full of information about the Vasa army in the 1550's , inparticular the Finnish units which have been very neglected by researchers.

Gustav Vasa och "den nationella hären".
Lars-Olof Larsson (Lund 1967)
link
Larsson was the first historian to take fresh look at the army reforms of the 1540's and was able to debunk a lot of older myths such as the notion that the 1544 reform had established a national army recruited by conscription. Today Larsson is today videly regarded as the foremost expert on the early Vasa period (though military history forms only a part of his studies). His two volumes about Gustav I Vasa and his sons is a very readable account of Swedish history from 1520 to 1600 particularly if read together with his earlier volume about the Kalmar Union period.

Regimental histories can provide usefull bits and pieces of information, the following are the ones which I've made the most use of at one time or another but other works contain usefull stuff as well. A weakness is that Finnish units are not covered and that

Kungl. Dalregementets historia. 1, Dalafänikor 1542-1617
Anton Pihlström (Stockholm 1902)

Kungl. lifregementets till häst historia 1, Upplands- och Södermanlandsfanorna intill år 1621
Axel Braunerhjelm

Östgöta ryttare 1552-1617
Reinhold Stenbock (Stockholm 1922)

Kungl. Första livgrenadjärregementets historia. I, Östgötafänikorna till och med år 1618
Gustaf Petri (Stockholm 1926)

Griefbringer19 Jan 2013 10:03 a.m. PST

Thanks for the suggestions, that is certainly an impressive list of books, though most of them don't sound like particularly easy to find. I should be able to locate at least some of them, though.

Daniel S20 Jan 2013 7:34 a.m. PST

A well stocked research library might have some of them, I'm not sure about the rules for intra-library loans in Finland but here in Sweden it is possible to get books from other Nordic countries though such loans are more restricted than the ILL between Swedish libraries.

Others could be found using antikvariat.net and bokborsen.se but the older ones rare and therefore often expensive.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.