Help support TMP

"War is over: ‘Bicholim Conflict’removed from Wikipedia" Topic

11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Fantasy Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board

1,320 hits since 6 Jan 2013
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2013 4:01 p.m. PST

War is over: Imaginary ‘Bicholim Conflict' page removed from Wikipedia after five years

By Eric Pfeiffer, Yahoo! News
While Wikipedia editors strive for perfection, some elaborate hoaxes have managed to slip through (BGR News)A 17th Century international conflict has finally been laid to rest, nearly 400 years after it never happened. Wait a second. Are you feeling confused?

A fascinating new story in the Daily Dot chronicles how for more than five years, rogue editors on Wikipedia perpetuated a hoax about the "Bicholim Conflict," a purely fictional historical event.

Before its eventual deletion, the 4,500-word page read in part:

"From 1640 to 1641 the might of colonial Portugal clashed with India's massive Maratha Empire in an undeclared war that would later be known as the Bicholim Conflict. Named after the northern Indian region where most of the fighting took place, the conflict ended with a peace treaty that would later help cement Goa as an independent Indian state."

Amazingly, the article was even nominated for the site's Featured Article of the Day, a Wikipedia stable that highlights some of the site's best-researched and written articles.

The actual writer of the Wikipedia article is still unknown, but members of the Wikipedia community have narrowed down at least one suspect.

"Unfortunately, hoaxes on Wikipedia are nothing new, and the craftier they are, the more difficult it is to catch them," William Beutler, president of Beutler Wiki Relations, a Wikipedia consulting firm, told Yahoo News. "Anyone who's clever enough to make up convincing sources and motivated enough to spend the time and skilled enough to write a plausible article can deceive whole Internet—at least for awhile."


A December 2012 poll by the Pew Internet and American Life Project found that Google and Wikipedia were the top two research tools used by U.S. middle and high school students.

To its credit, Wikipedia has its own page devoted to Wikipedia hoaxes. Some of the more noteworthy attempts include a page on a fictional conspirator in the assassination of Julius Caesar, a false claim of inspiration in the "Lord of the Rings" novels and a former Harvard student who for eight years successfully operated a Wikipedia page claiming he was the mayor of a small Chinese town.

Beutler, a longtime Wikipedia community editor himself, says he once helped remove a hoax article after its author contacted him in an attempt to boast of their prank.

And as Beutler notes, in many ways, Wikipedia is no different than the professional journalism world from which it culls so much of its source material. No single source is infallible, even to the watchful and detail oriented community of Wikpedia editors.

"There are the outliers in each: Jayson Blair for the New York Times, the ‘Bicholim conflict' author on Wikipedia," Beutler said. "Stephen Glass would have been a terrific Wikipedia hoaxer."

Even stranger, while the fake article itself has been deleted, the Bicholim Conflict continues to haunt the halls of the Internet at large.

As the Daily Dot notes, several references to the Bicholim Conflict continue to exist online, with other web sites having copied and pasted the text verbatim.

There's even a book version of the fraudulent article available for sale on the Barnes and Noble website for $20 USD and credited to "authors" Jesse Russell and Ronald Cohn. As the product's one reviewer notes in their comment, "A copy of a hoax Wikipedia article (which you could have read for free) in printed form."

Mako11 Inactive Member06 Jan 2013 4:11 p.m. PST

Hmmm, wonder how many college students got passing grades for papers on the subject?

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2013 4:49 p.m. PST

And how many wargamers played the war !!!!!

spontoon06 Jan 2013 4:56 p.m. PST

How many companies started figure ranges?

14Bore06 Jan 2013 5:20 p.m. PST

How many Ospreys about it are there?

Cincinnatus Inactive Member06 Jan 2013 5:24 p.m. PST

Isn't that the new theme for one of the Big East Cons?

darthfozzywig Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2013 5:48 p.m. PST

There goes my kickstarter dollars. :/

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2013 6:19 p.m. PST

Yeah, but is the Bongolesia article still up? 'Cause that's nothing but the honest truth!

Glengarry506 Jan 2013 6:37 p.m. PST

Sounds plausible to me.

Tgunner06 Jan 2013 8:12 p.m. PST

And how many wargamers played the war !!!!!

I'm not really into the whole pike and shot thing but this sounds interesting. Who makes the miniatures???

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER Inactive Member06 Jan 2013 10:40 p.m. PST

Some of us are still fighting it in our heads…

Longshot Supporting Member of TMP Inactive Member08 Jan 2013 10:38 a.m. PST

I love this place.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.