/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Tyrannosaurus vs. Triceratops," Topic

 Help support TMP


"Tyrannosaurus vs. Triceratops," Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Prehistoric Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Crusader


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article

The Army for Bill: Warband #5

The fifth Warband stand for the Army for Bill.


Featured Profile Article

Rubbery Dinos at the Dollar Store

Get these inexpensive dinos while you can.


Featured Book Review


1,991 hits since 28 Dec 2012
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0128 Dec 2012 9:14 p.m. PST

Nice diorama here.

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

From
link

More prehistoric miniatures here.
phoxim.de/figuren_dinos.html

For translation you can used.
translate.google.com/#de/en

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Old Glory Sponsoring Member of TMP28 Dec 2012 10:13 p.m. PST

Contrary to movies, were they actually around at the same time?
Regards
Russ Dunaway

mikeda28 Dec 2012 10:48 p.m. PST

Yes and both found in modern day north america

Rubber Suit Theatre28 Dec 2012 11:43 p.m. PST

To the point that Triceratops vertebrae have been unearthed with Tyrannosaurus tooth marks (which proves that they ate 'em, but not necessarily that they killed 'em). Not sure about the whole "kung-fu theropod" pose. Tails are awfully wiggly compared to what I've read – seems they were too long for the base.

svsavory29 Dec 2012 8:53 a.m. PST

Amazing paint work on the T-Rex.

WarrenB29 Dec 2012 12:01 p.m. PST

Looks like a tired old Jurassic Park tyrannosaur (it's a fairly distinctive design with it's spoon-shaped snout, zig-zaggy cheeks and great fleshy eye-wings) or one of the unnumbered knockoffs since 1993 that took the innaccuracies and alterations as gospel. Not so sure about the Triceratops, but it does have the cheek-right-up-to-the-beak that you don't see in many other restorations.

rvandusen29 Dec 2012 12:08 p.m. PST

Not too long ago there was a science article that discussed skeletal injuries on Triceratops fossils. The article claimed that a number of bite-marks showed signs of healing providing evidence that the Triceratops survived the encounter. It is also assumed that the bites could have only come from a Tyrannosaur since they were the only known animal large enough to cause such massive wounds.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.