"Tyrannosaurus vs. Triceratops," Topic

7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Prehistoric Message Board

Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article

Visigoths Now Available

Second Unarmoured Early Byzantine Skutatoi Unit Complete.

Top-Rated Ruleset

l'Art de la Guerre

Rating:

Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Undead Dinos III

The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.

Tango01	28 Dec 2012 10:14 p.m. PST
Nice diorama here. From link More prehistoric miniatures here. phoxim.de/figuren_dinos.html For translation you can used. translate.google.com/#de/en Hope you enjoy!. Amicalement Armand
Old Glory	28 Dec 2012 11:13 p.m. PST
Contrary to movies, were they actually around at the same time? Regards Russ Dunaway
mikeda	28 Dec 2012 11:48 p.m. PST
Yes and both found in modern day north america
Rubber Suit Theatre	29 Dec 2012 12:43 a.m. PST
To the point that Triceratops vertebrae have been unearthed with Tyrannosaurus tooth marks (which proves that they ate 'em, but not necessarily that they killed 'em). Not sure about the whole "kung-fu theropod" pose. Tails are awfully wiggly compared to what I've read – seems they were too long for the base.
svsavory	29 Dec 2012 9:53 a.m. PST
Amazing paint work on the T-Rex.
WarrenB	29 Dec 2012 1:01 p.m. PST
Looks like a tired old Jurassic Park tyrannosaur (it's a fairly distinctive design with it's spoon-shaped snout, zig-zaggy cheeks and great fleshy eye-wings) or one of the unnumbered knockoffs since 1993 that took the innaccuracies and alterations as gospel. Not so sure about the Triceratops, but it does have the cheek-right-up-to-the-beak that you don't see in many other restorations.
rvandusen	29 Dec 2012 1:08 p.m. PST
Not too long ago there was a science article that discussed skeletal injuries on Triceratops fossils. The article claimed that a number of bite-marks showed signs of healing providing evidence that the Triceratops survived the encounter. It is also assumed that the bites could have only come from a Tyrannosaur since they were the only known animal large enough to cause such massive wounds.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.