![The Miniatures Page logo](tmpshead.jpg)
"The Komondor Rdo-3221" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article![Ken and Kendra](workbench/pics/scf/2007/330655g.jpeg) Two of Hasslefree's Adventurers venture to Serbia...
Featured Profile Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01 ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 07 Dec 2012 12:04 p.m. PST |
Interesting Hungarian vehicle.
See YouTube link To those who knows about armour vehicles, what's your opinion? Thanks in advance for your comments. Amicalement Armand |
CraigH | 07 Dec 2012 12:14 p.m. PST |
Someday I hope to learn how you go from Sci-Fi to Pulp to Life magazine to modern vehicles in a matter of minutes
![grin grin](boards/icons/grin.gif) Keep the posts coming ! |
Tango01 ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 07 Dec 2012 12:53 p.m. PST |
You had forget WW2 Land, my friend (smile). Amicalement Armand |
Lion in the Stars | 07 Dec 2012 1:04 p.m. PST |
Another MRAP-equivalent. This one MIGHT have better visibility, which is a serious complaint about the US ones. I'm not sure that MRAPs are worth the costs, when you can simply change tactics and not need them. Yes, I do think that most military vehicles should have some measure of mine-resistance as a matter of good design principles, but current MRAPs are too big, too heavy, and too hard to support. |
thejoker | 07 Dec 2012 5:15 p.m. PST |
Not an MRAP but a NBC recon vehicle. (Wiki translation) |
|