Help support TMP


"RAFM French Indian War figures size comparison ?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SYW Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Brother Against Brother


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


1,719 hits since 2 Dec 2012
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

bobblez bob02 Dec 2012 12:02 p.m. PST

Any ideas what size comparison of the RAFM minis are like compared to more recent manufactures like Conquest or Perry Minis ?

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2012 12:15 p.m. PST

RAFM's figs were sculpted decades ago and are small by today's standards.

John the OFM02 Dec 2012 12:16 p.m. PST

The French, British and militia are "true 25mm", while the Indians are even smaller than that.

Perry and Conquest etc are 28mm.

Rudysnelson02 Dec 2012 12:17 p.m. PST

79PA is right the RAFM sculpts were 25mm and sculpted in the 1980s. So they would be small compared to 28mm.

This would be the same issue with Frontier USA which were also done in the 1980s.

bobblez bob02 Dec 2012 12:29 p.m. PST

Mmmm thats as I thought, thanks for the confirmation. Bless them, I bet they were the bees knees back then…. how things have changed !

spontoon02 Dec 2012 1:14 p.m. PST

They're still the Bee's Knee's! Everbody elses' scale is wrong!

I have hundreds of the things and they're about 2mm taller than old Minifigs and about 3mm smaller than current Perry's. Depending on what you want to do with them they're still quite useable with other ranges. Probably best not to mix them, I have with fair success.

The Flint & Feather range were sculpted by Bob Murch of PulP Figures Fame. The All the King's Men range were sculpted by someone else and are not as nice.

I wouldn't mix them with current Foundry British, which are ABSOLUTELY HUGE!

saltflats192902 Dec 2012 6:51 p.m. PST

They aren't too bad mixed with old glory but it is so strange these days to by a pack of 6 of the exact same figure. how spoiled we are now.

spontoon04 Dec 2012 6:27 p.m. PST

I like my figs to be the same for line troops. I would like some variety for light and irregular troops and have done conversions and head swaps with the RAFM's.

spontoon08 Dec 2012 10:53 a.m. PST

It also depends which Old Glory range you compare the RAFM's with. Fine with the French & Indian War range. I've used their open handed gunners to make drummers and ensigns for my piedmontese army. I assume these are younger soldiers so a bit of height difference doesn't matter much.

They won't mix well with the OG Jacobite range which are much bigger and cruder.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.