T Meier  | 11 Oct 2012 5:24 a.m. PST |
Female body types in bikinis mostly, no nudes. link |
 John the OFM  | 11 Oct 2012 5:34 a.m. PST |
I tried to tell a "thin with assets" type that I was an artist. She got suspicious when I started to trace her. |
| sma1941 | 11 Oct 2012 5:40 a.m. PST |
I like female body types…all types. |
| SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 11 Oct 2012 5:53 a.m. PST |
|
 Saber6  | 11 Oct 2012 6:06 a.m. PST |
|
 rampantlion | 11 Oct 2012 6:22 a.m. PST |
I guess we'll find smokey lurking towards the bottom of the page in the "larger" section? |
| GarrisonMiniatures | 11 Oct 2012 6:26 a.m. PST |
Like the frequent use of the word 'thick'. |
 The Beast Rampant | 11 Oct 2012 6:26 a.m. PST |
#3 has broad hips, but I would hardly call her an "hourglass". "Average" does not look at all happy with her label. And we need to start a caption contest for the "BBW". Odd choice of photos! Thanks, T.M. |
| The Beast Rampant | 11 Oct 2012 6:28 a.m. PST |
I guess we'll find smokey lurking towards the bottom of the page in the "larger" section? He can use my duckblind while I make the beer run. |
| 45thdiv | 11 Oct 2012 6:31 a.m. PST |
Aw. I keep getting "you may have an android virus" and then the page closes. |
 Rrobbyrobot | 11 Oct 2012 8:28 a.m. PST |
So take your android to the Doctor. |
| The Beast Rampant | 11 Oct 2012 10:28 a.m. PST |
Waitaminnit- #3 is photoshopped. She has no ribcage- anywhere. (Not just cleverly hidden, like #19.) I call shenanigans!  |
| T Meier | 11 Oct 2012 11:58 a.m. PST |
I call shenanigans! Partly #3 is the camera angle but otherwise she's just a type I've seen before. A friend of mine built sets for a local theater troop, there was a dancer who seemed to defy the laws of thermodynamics. There was just no way the internal organs which could be fitted in to her relatively tiny body cavity could power her comparatively huge legs and arms. |
| The Beast Rampant | 11 Oct 2012 1:13 p.m. PST |
OK, I defer to your learned eye. |
| Melnibonean | 19 Oct 2012 5:52 a.m. PST |
No shenanigans. If there were there would be tell tale signs in the warping or reproduction of shapes/patterns in the background image. There are none. Also there are faint undulations where you can see her ribs on the outer edges of her torso. Most attempts at photoshoping would have these straitened and flattened so it would look totally inorganic. This isn't the case. Photoshop shenanigans are easy to spot when you know what to look for. |
