"British Army vehicle camouflage patterns" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Painting Guides Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article It's hard to find 25mm Russians in the early-war summer uniform, but here they are!
Featured Profile Article Does anyone claim these mystery photos?
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Scott1507 | 25 Aug 2012 1:44 p.m. PST |
I understand that with the instructions on the colours for camouflage there is also details on recommended or required patterns for discruptive colours. For example the 1943 Sicily/Italy patterns' blue black should be applied in a certain manner or frequency. Can anyone confirm if there were such 'pattern' regualtions and what are the requirements for the light mud / blue black vehicle camouflage. Regards
Scott |
| fred12df | 26 Aug 2012 3:04 a.m. PST |
This link, would indicate the patterns were standardised – without saying what they were!
link April 1943 – G.O 1650 is cancelled by a new G.O with standardised drawings for certain type and classes of AFV and vehicles are decreed by the Camouflage Directorate including new colours for Tunisia , Sicily and Italy . Basic shade is ‘Light Mud' with Black in standardised bold disruptive patterns for camouflage. Green seems to have been used too. The European patterns were described in pamphlets called MTP20 or MTP46 |
| Etranger | 27 Aug 2012 8:41 p.m. PST |
|
| Scott1507 | 02 Sep 2012 11:02 a.m. PST |
Hi Thanks – Copies of documents such as MTP 46A are ideally what I am looking for. Many yeras ago I saw sucha document and it gave details regarding where and what proportions the disruptive patter should be. I would have thought these documents would have been readily available as a reference to choices in paint schemes on models. |
|
