Help support TMP


"The Waffentrager Krupp Pak 44 12.8cm " Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
World War Two on the Land

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Derivan Paints: Striking It Lucky With Colour

Sometimes at a convention, you can be just dead lucky and find a real bargain.


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Can It Map?

Can artificial intelligence create useful maps for wargamers?


Featured Profile Article

Uncle Jasper Was a Commando

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds a personal connection to WWII.


Current Poll


4,413 hits since 31 Jul 2012
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP01 Aug 2012 10:28 a.m. PST

Think it would be the terror of the tanks.
"The choice of 128 mm was made because of the availability of tooling due to the use of this caliber on naval weapons, design contracts being awarded to Rheinmetall Borsig and Krupp, the first prototype guns were delivered for testing in late 1944. Rheinmetall began development on a variant of the 128 mm FlaK gun. whilst Krupp opted to design a new weapon from the ground up. After initial tests the Rheinmetall design was dropped and development continued with the Krupp design. However the service tests showed that a towed anti-tank gun weighing nearly 11 tonnes was impractical so the towed design was terminated.

Approximately 50 barrels and breeches were used on existing carriages. The weapon that used the ex-French GPF-T carriage was known as the K 81/1 while the K 81/2 used the ex-Russian carriage. Both of these designs were rushed, and were too heavy, making them cumbersome to deploy. In 1943 the design was started for a gun to mount on the Jagdtiger (Sd.Kfz. 186) and the Maus super-heavy tank was started using the Pak 44 as its starting point. This weapon of which approximately 100 were made was known both as the Pak 44 and Pak 80 / Panzerjägerkanone Pjk 80. Performance was identical to the initial design.

The gun was fed with two-piece ammunition, the projectile and cartridge making up separate pieces. Because of this the gun could be fired using three different sized propellant charges, a light, medium and heavy charge. The light and medium charges were normally used when the gun was fulfilling the role of an artillery piece, where they would launch the ~28 kg projectiles to a muzzle velocity of 845 m/s and 880 m/s respectively. Finally the heavy charge was used when the gun was fulfilling its intended role as an anti-tank gun, where it fired a 28.3 kg APCBC-HE projectile (PzGr.43) at a muzzle velocity of 935 m/s. With the heavy charge, and using the PzGr.43 projectile, the PaK44 was capable of penetrating just over 200 millimetres (7.9 in) of 30 degree sloped armor at 1000 meters, and 148 millimetres (5.8 in) at 2,000 metres (2,200 yd) range. But although its short-range performance was similar to the 8.8 cm PaK 43, the 12.8 cm PaK 44 better maintained its performance over longer ranges.

The 12.8 cm PaK44 ended up becoming the standard main armament for the Jagdtiger heavy tank destroyer, as well as being the planned main armament for most of the future heavy tank designs in development during the dying months of World War II, including the Maus and E-100."
From Wiki.

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

From main page
link

What about the color?. Not camouflage for those monsters?

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

jdpintex01 Aug 2012 11:04 a.m. PST

Why would you even bother to camoflage this monster. The dust cloud raised with every shot would tell everyone in sight exactly where the rounds were coming from. also not sure the splinter shield would be all that useful.

Lovely model though.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP01 Aug 2012 11:51 a.m. PST

When you carried it and to avoid the enemy Air Force?
Glad you had enjoy the model my friend.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.