Help support TMP


"Plastic miniatures - love or hate?" Topic


118 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Ancients
18th Century
American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Crucible's Boogey Men

Whatever happened to the Boogey Men?


Featured Workbench Article

Black Cat Bases' Vampire Queen

alizardincrimson2 Fezian sails to the Skeleton Seas, and finds inspiration as she goes.


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


10,084 hits since 30 May 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 3 

Fat Wally30 May 2012 11:51 p.m. PST

I have nothing against plastics but I prefer metal miniatures. I just can't be bothered to assemble figures and I game exclusively in 15mm so 28's have zero appeal.

That said, I have nothing against 15mm plastic AFV's and own PSC and Zvezda stuff.

Lord Raglan30 May 2012 11:59 p.m. PST

Love them or hate them, it would appear that plastic miniatures are a growing market with some companies investing a considerable amount of money into development and production.

One point that has not been mentioned in this discussion, is the re-sale value of painted plastic miniatures. I have often changed wargaming periods and ended up selling collections to fund another project. With painted metal miniatures, I have always sold them at a resonable profit for the time and effort that has been invested into the job of painting and basing them.

However when I look at the price of second-hand plastic miniatures, rarely do they sell at a good price. Although this is not the main reason that I avoid plastic miniatures, it is certainly a reinforcing factor in my choice of only selecting metal miniatures for my collections.

Raglan

advocate31 May 2012 1:39 a.m. PST

I like both metal and plastic. I prefer carrying plastic armies though.

Lluis Vilalta31 May 2012 1:43 a.m. PST

I love good metals and good plastics!

Ditto.

Hard plastics better than soft ones, though.

Tarantella31 May 2012 1:43 a.m. PST

Excellent idea which in the long run should entice young gamers to try historical gaming but personally will hold out for 20mm slim figure hard plastics in the early periods before committing.

Patrick R31 May 2012 2:01 a.m. PST

I think a lot of hard plastic sets have excellent detail. They are easy to convert and the ability to generate your own poses is part of the fun. Of course assembling plastic minis can be a bit of a chore sometimes, especially with sets that do have a lot of parts. I don't have a problem with the lack of heft, having lugged metal armies around, wishing they were plastics instead.

Martin Rapier31 May 2012 2:52 a.m. PST

I have loved plastic figures since the late 1960s and continue to do so. Nice human proportions, easy to convert, easy to carry even if they do have some goofy poses:)

Modern hard plastic figures are all very well, but the spindly bits (like rifles etc) are very vulnerable to breakage in teh smaller scale unless you go for overscale weapon proportions. I've got some hard plastics from the 70s and they are mainly missing their rifle barrels too, unlike my trusty Airfix figures.

Dexter Ward31 May 2012 3:53 a.m. PST

My trusty Airfix figures have mostly gone brittle with age and disintegrated, a problem hard plastic doesn't seem to suffer from.

To those who say they dislike assembling plastics – I find them a lot easier to stick together than many metal figures which require shields and spears to be added. Plastic glue gives a nice strong bond, whereas with metals one has to prop them up with blu-tack while the shield and spear are glued.
Metals also often require quite a bit of prep with files to remove flash. I don't think plastic are any worse, really, just different.

Fred Cartwright31 May 2012 5:05 a.m. PST

One point that has not been mentioned in this discussion, is the re-sale value of painted plastic miniatures. However when I look at the price of second-hand plastic miniatures, rarely do they sell at a good price.

Can't say I've noticed this and looked at a lot of second hand figures over the last few months, both on Ebay and at shows. Seen painted Perry's go for 3x the price of the box, which seems a reasonable profit to me. Conversely have seen metals go and bargain bin prices – less than the cost of the bare metal. IMHO how well painted they are is more important.

Dogged31 May 2012 5:30 a.m. PST

The future is plastic, although metals will surely always get their pick for special things (the less profitable).

I have not seen such a difference in reselling value; I'd say it should have more to do with quality of painting, but maybe the basic material being cheaper can lower the top.

I guess the "heft" thing has much to do with a feeling for "old times"; I started gaming with plastics back in the early 90s and never have had any issue with "lack of heft". If I ever want to put more weight in my hands, there are other ways to do so… ;-)

wargame insomniac31 May 2012 5:36 a.m. PST

I'm happy to use both plastic and metals in my armies and would be prepared to mix them for conversions etc.

Does nt mean that I like all plastics, in the same way that I don't like all metals. For example some of the Wargames Factory plastic kits lack detail and some look slightly oddly proportioned. I refer mainly to their earlier kits but they have improved over time. However you still need to turn to a metals range for characters and specialist units.

For that reason I tend to think of Perry Miniatures and Warlord Games as the best balance, with plastic for core troops and then metals to finish the range. Of the two then Perry comes out trumps with barely any poor sculpts across their entire catalogue.

Mix and match.

Cheers

James

axabrax31 May 2012 6:53 a.m. PST

They may not be your cup, but "hate?" Really?

Could you explain how you have to "adjust" your painting style" to paint plastics? I don't get that. I paint them exactly the same way as I do metals except I don't worry as much about the varnish because plastics rarely chip.

oldbob31 May 2012 7:04 a.m. PST

My main concern with Plastics is cutting them off the spur's and then having to assemble them. Usually I end up doing a lot pinning, arms to body's, heads to body's. I do prefer metal!

Altefritz31 May 2012 7:55 a.m. PST

Both: 6mm metal, 20mm plastic. Not enough time to try 15mm metal, but I would.

wargame insomniac31 May 2012 8:07 a.m. PST

Oldbob- some plastics are easier than others to assemble, in the same way as some metals. Thus for example for 28mm plastic Napoleonics, I have found Vicrtix's British/French much more fiddly than their Perry Miniatures equivalents.

And again many metals require some assembly. Many ancients figures have separate weapons and shields and some have separate heads. So metals might involve 3-4 components whilst plastics might involve 6-7. That is a difference but not massive.

Re pinning that is not really a true comparison of plastics vs metals. As you would probably have to pin just as many metals as plastics. Sometimes less as plastic glue gives a stronger bond on plastics than superglue on metals.

Thus I'm happy to use plastic and metal models- mix and match.

Cheers

James

Marshal Mark31 May 2012 8:50 a.m. PST

One point that has not been mentioned in this discussion, is the re-sale value of painted plastic miniatures. …..

However when I look at the price of second-hand plastic miniatures, rarely do they sell at a good price.

Really ?How about this :
auction

Mick in Switzerland31 May 2012 8:52 a.m. PST

Dear Oldbob,
Re your comment "My main concern with Plastics is cutting them off the spur's and then having to assemble them. Usually I end up doing a lot pinning, arms to body's, heads to body's"

There are different techniques and tools for plastics. If you use the same techniques as with metal figures, you are making life hard for yourself.

If you use polystyrene cement such as Revell Contacta, there is no need to pin hard plastic figures. I buy the bottle with a brush and paint a little on each part. After about 30 seconds I assemble and get an instant bond. This hardens properly in a few minutes. I usually assemble 4 or 5 figures at a time so that the last added parts have set when I come back to the figure.

A good pair of sprue cutters (GW or Tamiya) makes a world of difference to assembling plastics. I have a pair of Tamiya sharp pointed sprue cutters and I can cut completely flush so that I do not even need to file away the sprue remains. This makes assembly 5 times as fast.

Mick

Marshal Mark31 May 2012 8:56 a.m. PST

Re pinning that is not really a true comparison of plastics vs metals. As you would probably have to pin just as many metals as plastics. Sometimes less as plastic glue gives a stronger bond on plastics than superglue on metals.

Agreed. In fact, you shouldn't have to pin plastics at all, as there is so little weight in the component you are gluing that it is unlikely to come off. Also when you use polystyrene cement you get a few seconds to adjust the part you are gluing, but still retaining the bond, which you don't get when gluing metal with superglue.

oldbob31 May 2012 9:07 a.m. PST

Good points guys, somethings I'm a little to anal!

Lord Raglan31 May 2012 9:08 a.m. PST

Marshal Mark

The world has gone nuts!

Raglan

oldbob31 May 2012 9:22 a.m. PST

Raglan; I'm working on Ptolemy right now, using two of the Aventine figures.

Lord Raglan31 May 2012 9:34 a.m. PST

Bob,

Will you post a photo or two of the finished product?

I am pretty much nearing completion of the Successor project.

Raglan

John Sowerby31 May 2012 10:00 a.m. PST

Most figures I have are plastics, with some metal, mainly for the characters/leaders/specialists.

I know it's a bone of contention for some, but the multipart aspect of plastics is a big bonus.

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP31 May 2012 1:07 p.m. PST

I really like plastics, if I could have waited longer I could have done every half finished metal project in plastics instead !

HaT, Zvezda, Orion, Strelets, all great figures.

I honestly wish I'd never bought any historicals in metal, and just got the fantasy/SF stuff (and even that is starting to appear in plastic – thanks Caesar !!).

So I guess that's love.

Bill N31 May 2012 1:28 p.m. PST

I am a big fan of plastic troops. They are inexpensive and are fairly easy to convert with a sharp hobby knife and some glue. Many of the sets are sufficiently detailed that a mediocre painter can get acceptable results. When you get to more modern subjects there is also the advantage of being able to buy vehicles and scenery items that are either the same scale or close enough to be useful.

Now I do wish that manufacturers had done a better job of coordinating metal and plastic scales so we had more metal figures that could be used to supplement or upgrade plastic figures.

Tom Servo31 May 2012 4:46 p.m. PST

I'd happily use hard plastics if they came in one piece, but I simply have no interest in gluing together individual arms, legs, torsos, heads, and weapons.
Someone with an entrepreneurial streak should start a hard plastic assembly business.

Soldat31 May 2012 5:04 p.m. PST

not a fan of plastics as they break easily and have fidly bits.

wargame insomniac01 Jun 2012 6:43 a.m. PST

@ Soldat- you can't tar ALL plastic figures with same brush.

SOME plastics are fiddly and fragile, some are not. In the same way SOME metals are fiddly and fragile, some are not.

I wish people would avoid making excessive generalisations about plastic vs metal. Both are good and have their place. Some examples of both are poor and should be avoided.

Cheers

James

Muerto01 Jun 2012 7:23 p.m. PST

"Welcome to 3TMP talkback radio. Our next caller wants to talk about soldiers…"

"Yes sonny. Back in my day we had metal miniatures and we bloody well liked it. We had to smelt the metal ourselves from ore we mined ourselves – this was before those namby-pamby laws against kiddys working in the mines, and not being in National Service – and we had to haul that ore back to our houses 40 miles away, walking across snow in bare feet, and there was broken glass under the snow, and we bloody well liked it. It we wanted to modify our figures we had to bite that arm off – this was before those bloody wimps invented lead poisoning, along with the fluoride mind control in the water – and we had to bite that arm off. If a bit of metal flew out and took out your eye, we bloody well liked it. I lost seven eyes to flying toy bayonets. I also lost another 8 to real bayonets, and I bloody well liked it. Mind you, laddie, the generation before complained about our metal figures, they did. Always complaining that it was better when they had miniatures carved out of stone. Improbable rants they made over the carrier pigeon network, you see. Now, where's my scone and cup of tea?"

VonBurge02 Jun 2012 5:34 p.m. PST

Plastics are really increasing my ability to get into to new periods and scales. So plastics are working out great for me.

TKindred02 Jun 2012 11:49 p.m. PST

Me too. I can now consider armies that before were out of reach to me.

Paint Pig03 Jun 2012 3:16 a.m. PST

Time is money and both are limited grin

Plastics have a place of that there is no doubt but, by the time I have scratched off the mold lines, glued on the heads, arms, torso's hat and what have you (different for the various brands of course) filled and sanded the joins on 24 figures, well, I've pretty much had a gut full before I even lay down a coat of primer.

The quality of the metal figure manufacturers is very good at the moment (plenty of competition) and I rarely have to spend much time on flash and mold lines per figure. So from a purely practicable point of view I'm not a plastics fan at the moment.

There are some great plastics out there and they offer a cheap alternative for those with the time.

regards
dave

Midpoint03 Jun 2012 7:09 a.m. PST

I've bought a couple of boxes. Didn't enjoy putting them together and don't feel confident in their longevity. Economically, I'm short on the time, not the money. I doubt I'll be buying more boxes. Might buy some ready painted though.

Perfectly happy for others to use them, just not for me.

Ancestral Hamster03 Jun 2012 5:36 p.m. PST

My preference was for the heft of metal, but I like the versatility of plastics. They are easy to convert which gives you more variety.

Mind, I have just spent four hours assembling a mere five Necron Immortals, so the increasing complexity of GW kits is not welcome. The early skeletons and Space Marine kits were (for me) the happy medium between variety/versatility.

Earlier in the year I purchased the Wargames Factory yari ashigaru set. Have not built them yet, but just looking at the sprues they seem more reasonable.

Bosco0504 Jun 2012 3:48 a.m. PST

To each their own. I like plastics due to the cost advantage and I find assembling / customizing to be a fun part of the hobby. Most of my 28mm armies contain a mix of plastics for the bulk troops (basic infantry) and metals for the specialized ones (leaders / artillery / cavalry).

In terms of painting, I find painting plastics to be much easier than metals but I've only been in the miniature hobby 4 years or so.

The only plastics I do not recommend are the original Victrix French as they were very difficult to assemble and do not stand up to gaming wear and tear very well.

Miles

Mick in Switzerland04 Jun 2012 4:30 a.m. PST

For me, the coming of plastics has allowed me to build bigger and better armies. I started about five years ago with about 45 metal Mirliton Swiss. I wanted to add to this but they were expensive figures. They remained as a small skirmish force.

When the Perry plastics came out I started to expand my Swiss and build a mostly plastic Burgundian army.

The Perry plastic figures are fun to build as you can make each one different. They are also nice to paint if you use Burgundian livery and Swiss Cantonal colours. So far, I am up to 160 plastic infantry, 24 plastic cavalry, two metal guns and 80+ metal infantry.

Mick

14Bore Supporting Member of TMP04 Jun 2012 3:42 p.m. PST

4500+ metal, 1 plastic. But would give plastics a chance if they came in 15 – 18mm French Nap's

HammerHead05 Jun 2012 5:26 a.m. PST

I like plastic because varnish a plastic fig it stays, metal sometimes develop a small spot that needs re-painting. I like & mix both plastic figures plus you can get some great deals buying metal fig so cost is`nt an issue.
I like fantasy in metal display figs are better in metal

cafard05 Jun 2012 6:25 a.m. PST

I love how fall-resistant most hard plastic minis are. The paint doesn't come off easily, whereas an innocent tumble from a couple cms high may be enough to get a chip of paint go off a metal mini. Plastic has a higher tolerance to rough-handling i find. Handy when you're not all that careful or have kids involved.

Not a fan of the soft-plastic stuff though, like you typically get in Fantasy flight board games. About impossible for me to fold the flawed ones back straight (all my hot water attempts resulted in the mini folding back over time).

Marc the plastics fan06 Jun 2012 5:38 a.m. PST

Soft plastics work well for me – nostalgia, cost and great ranges for my fave period Naps.

hard plastic are nice

metal are nice

So no real love hate relationship – I like them all.

Captain Crunch06 Jun 2012 9:02 p.m. PST

The only plastics I have worked with are Napoleonic Austrians from Victrix. They were easy to assemble, look really good painted and I got a box of 56 figures (including a mounted officer) and flags for about $34 USD! I am looking forward to getting more of these. Nothing against metal mind you, but I am now leaning toward plastics.

Paul

WillieB07 Jun 2012 5:46 a.m. PST

Prefer metal, and 99.99% of my collection is effectively metal.
However, I have to admit that some of the plastic boxes offer separate arms and such that are very useful( and cheaper than cutting up another metal figure) for conversion work.
Absolutely no resin except for vehicles.

bombersmoon07 Jun 2012 6:33 a.m. PST

Plastics everytime.Good fun to put together. Easy to work with the poly glue. great quality figures, and far better value than metals.

Metals – expensive, and superglue a pain to work with. Finished quality no better than plastic.

I guess the quality of the finished models (metals vs plasics) is subjective, and will vary between manufacturers. What is a bit of a disapointment to me is the trend towards the plastics sets just being 'cannon fodder' – eg whole napoleonic unit in march attack mode. It would be good to have some character models in the plastic sets – that is one downside for me.

wargame insomniac07 Jun 2012 12:58 p.m. PST

And that is where ranges like Warlord Games and Perry Miniatures score highly for me. Plastic rank and file and metal characters, command, front rank and specialist troops.

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP08 Jun 2012 9:11 a.m. PST

I just received a number of Warlords TYW boxed sets, my second foray into plastics along with Perry's Wars of the Roses.

Sure the Warlord plastics lack some detail but overall they look quite nice. I enjoy putting them together as well. I think the boxed regiments that are plastic with metal command figures is a model for other companies to emulate.

Whats not to like?

Edwulf13 Jun 2012 6:21 a.m. PST

Love both buy both. Mix both together.

My painting style is the same and the only thing that marks them out is the weight. Plastics are my bulk troops my redcoats my longbows and bills. My metals are my fancy units. I certainly can build up armies faster than I could relying on just metals. Metals can be a pain to prep and glue together.

ScottS13 Jun 2012 7:50 a.m. PST

I love how fall-resistant most hard plastic minis are. The paint doesn't come off easily, whereas an innocent tumble from a couple cms high may be enough to get a chip of paint go off a metal mini.

This is true. Several weeks ago I tripped over the family cat and dropped the Romans I was working on. About 120 little Warlord plastic Romans hit the concrete floor of the basement.

The only casualty was a simgle pilum which snapped; I was able to glue it back on.

If they'd been metal, I would have abandoned the army.

BigAnth21 Aug 2012 7:24 a.m. PST

I don't like metal and prefer softer plastics.

Yesthatphil21 Aug 2012 7:47 a.m. PST

I prefer both metal and soft plastic to hard plastic thumbs up

ChicChocMtdRifles21 Aug 2012 7:58 a.m. PST

Years ago, I swore I was gonna set up my own plastic miniature company so I could make the men I needed. I hated buying a few boxes of soldiers and having only three or four attacking/standing firing/etc per box.

Then I found metals. Yeah, maybe half as many men per box, but I could get as many of a type as I needed. So, didn't consider my own plastics ideas anymore.

Pages: 1 2 3