Help support TMP


"WW2 naval war in the med - book" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Microscale LCT(5) from Image Studios

Thinking to invade German-held Europe? Then you'll need some of these...


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


1,224 hits since 29 Apr 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
CptKremmen29 Apr 2012 3:31 p.m. PST

Hi all,

Could i have a recommendation for a good general military history of the naval fighting in the mediterranean in WW2. particularly from the british viewpoint.

Reasonably detailed, but interesting to read, nothing too dry or academic.

Thanks guys

Andy

wpilon29 Apr 2012 3:47 p.m. PST

Try Stuggle for the Middle Sea by Vincent P. O'Hara. Its meticulously researched, complete but very well written, not at all dry or boring.

Here's a link to brief review I wrote in my book blog.

link

hindsTMP29 Apr 2012 4:49 p.m. PST

"The Naval War in the Mediterranean, 1940-1943" by Greene and Massignani.

link

It is desirable to have joint authorship from both sides, as it tends to reduce national bias (the early 1960s-1970s British-only books were often significantly biased). The O'Hara book mentioned previously is also valuable, and he goes out of his way to avoid the traditional pro-British bias I mentioned.

MH

21eRegt29 Apr 2012 7:17 p.m. PST

Another hearty endorsement for the two books named above.

freerangeegg30 Apr 2012 12:08 a.m. PST

Another endorsement for Green and Massignani.Well written and gives a nicely balanced view of events.

CptKremmen30 Apr 2012 2:41 a.m. PST

Both sound great, thanks.

jgibbons30 Apr 2012 3:17 a.m. PST

Both are great – I'm just finishing Naval War in the Med

CptKremmen30 Apr 2012 8:12 a.m. PST

I have ordered a copy of

"The Naval War in the Mediterranean, 1940-1943" by Greene and Massignani.

Some reviews I looked at seemed to feel there was a strong bias against the british in Mr O'Haras book.

Charlie 1230 Apr 2012 10:44 p.m. PST

I'd take those reviews with a grain of salt. Most are from the established pro-British viewpoint that has dominated historys about the naval war in the Med. Both books mentioned above are refreshing in being far more balanced than previous historys. I'd definitely reconsider O'Haras book.

Chouan01 May 2012 5:07 a.m. PST

"Malta Convoys, 1940-1943" by Richard Woodman.

valerio02 May 2012 2:08 a.m. PST

from the Italian point of view I would strongly strongly suggest Giorgio Giorgerini, but I am not sure if has been translated into English.

His "la guerra italiana sul mare" – the italian war at sea – provide extensive coverage of pre-war Italian naval policy, the Italian doctrine of the fleet-in-being and an assessment of how this doctrine was actually applied during the war, a critical analisys of Italian technological weak points (radar, carriers,etc.).

And only then, having put all of this in proper context, Giorgerini goes into the story of the whole war, battle after battle and convoy after convoy. very critical, also very fair. Hope you can find a translated copy.

lapatrie8803 May 2012 11:00 a.m. PST

With others above, another recommendation for Vincent O'Hara's book. It is really a very useful, concise outline of the destroyers and larger actions throughout the war, including several convoy-oriented actions. O'Hara give the Italian navy a good deal of deserved attention considering their interests in the Mediterranean and their involvemen, but there is no bias against the Royal Navy, especially seeing how efficient the RN was in clearing the Red Sea, and having won at least their share of the face-to-face actions. O'Hara does omit most reference to the air campaigns, submarine and carrier battles, though, wishing to concentrate on the surface actions.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.