Editor in Chief Bill | 26 Apr 2012 9:43 a.m. PST |
Other than the barbarians, which nation was Rome's greatest enemy? |
Chocolate | 26 Apr 2012 9:46 a.m. PST |
|
John the OFM | 26 Apr 2012 9:47 a.m. PST |
The other side in a Roman civil war. And, by the way, who says the Gauls were unciviized or barbarians? In fact, I would say that virtually ALL of Rome's opponents had various degrees of civilization. Including the Huns. |
GoneNow | 26 Apr 2012 9:50 a.m. PST |
Yeah, Rome was Rome's greatest enemy. |
Caesar | 26 Apr 2012 9:54 a.m. PST |
Gotta go with the Romans. |
CommanderCarnage | 26 Apr 2012 10:09 a.m. PST |
Mithridates, not the greatest in the form of a threat but fun to game. Lot's of great history there along with a who's who of Roman generals to pit against him. |
Mapleleaf | 26 Apr 2012 10:44 a.m. PST |
Parthia a different civilization but not barbaric. |
CeruLucifus | 26 Apr 2012 10:51 a.m. PST |
|
Patrick Sexton | 26 Apr 2012 11:10 a.m. PST |
|
anleiher | 26 Apr 2012 11:10 a.m. PST |
|
Glengarry 4 | 26 Apr 2012 11:24 a.m. PST |
|
BobTYW | 26 Apr 2012 11:37 a.m. PST |
Carthage – earlier on (Republican period) Sassanid Persia (Imperial to Middle) |
Porkmann | 26 Apr 2012 11:52 a.m. PST |
Parthia then Sassanid Persia. |
ashill4 | 26 Apr 2012 12:19 p.m. PST |
Carthage for Republican period, Sassanid for the Middle/Late period and Normans for the Byzantine period. I have heard it said that Rome reached its zenith at and just after the battle of Zama and that it was all downhill after that. Food for thought. |
Sysiphus | 26 Apr 2012 12:23 p.m. PST |
Sassanid Persia, the long running conflict with Rome allowed the Arab's to succeed. |
Johny Boy | 26 Apr 2012 12:59 p.m. PST |
As suggested Rome's greatest enemy was always going to be internal strife, however externally, I 'd go with the Sassanids as well. |
John the Selucid | 26 Apr 2012 1:14 p.m. PST |
Has to be Carthage during the 2nd Punic war, the only nation that tried to conquer Rome rather than just stop Roman expansion. |
JJartist | 26 Apr 2012 1:27 p.m. PST |
Carthage and Persia
. tied |
rvandusen | 26 Apr 2012 2:03 p.m. PST |
Carthage for the Republic and the Sassanids from the Late Empire. |
RelliK | 26 Apr 2012 2:14 p.m. PST |
|
14Bore | 26 Apr 2012 3:31 p.m. PST |
My answer as soon as I saw the post is the same as Timyminis |
Ping Pong Redux | 26 Apr 2012 3:42 p.m. PST |
PFJ or the JPF :) I gotta go with Carthage, just because. |
idontbelieveit | 26 Apr 2012 4:04 p.m. PST |
The Muslim Arabs should be on the list to consider. |
Nashville | 26 Apr 2012 5:52 p.m. PST |
Rome's greatest enemy? Religion. The Jewish war went on for decades and a Jewish fellow managed a revenge by converting much of the Empire to a non-pagan religion. Anybody who could defeat the Roman Pantheon of gods is pretty powerful in my book. ALSO , Rome defeated all its other enemies except for the runner up
Attila the Hun.
|
Agesilaus | 26 Apr 2012 7:32 p.m. PST |
Epirus is the coolest. Parthia is up there. But definitely the "greatest" was Carthage. Huge struggle for survival. |
Flat Beer and Cold Pizza | 26 Apr 2012 8:30 p.m. PST |
|
skippy0001 | 26 Apr 2012 10:32 p.m. PST |
Han China..they just missed each other by a few days. |
PrimiPili | 27 Apr 2012 12:04 a.m. PST |
|
PrimiPili | 27 Apr 2012 12:08 a.m. PST |
Sorry for not paying attention before. The Samnites. |
CooperSteveOnTheLaptop | 27 Apr 2012 2:07 a.m. PST |
Persians. But i give the Jews a lot of credit too |
Shaun Travers | 27 Apr 2012 5:36 a.m. PST |
Persians. But then I like the Persians much better than the Romans so I am biased. Really the answer should be Carthage but I don't like them as much as the Persians. |
Gennorm | 27 Apr 2012 6:06 a.m. PST |
Rome was definitely her worst. |
21eRegt | 27 Apr 2012 9:40 a.m. PST |
Just to throw another into the mix, Macedon under Phyrrus. Won a couple of costly victories against the Republic and with a little luck could have done better. |
valerio | 27 Apr 2012 10:47 a.m. PST |
the only entities the Romans actually feared werfe Cartagine and the Persian empire. |
goragrad | 27 Apr 2012 10:54 a.m. PST |
Carthage came closest. Not sure how civilized you want to consider the Huns. Turks were latecomers but they did take Constantinople and finish off the last emperor. |
Lee Brilleaux | 27 Apr 2012 11:52 a.m. PST |
There's a big difference between "Can they destroy us?" and "Can they take away a chunk of our borderlands?" An existential threat over a political problem. In that context, Carthage is the winner, by far. Pyrrus was a danger, as were the Samnites. And, finally, the Seljuks of course. The Persians fought long wars over a fairly specific frontier area. They did not threaten the existence of Rome. And they had some pretty silly headgear, which surely counts against them. I note, BTW, that Terry Jones made a strong case that the Dacians were hugely more advanced than they are given credit for, and that the Roman response to their rise shows how serious a threat they appeared. |
Trajanus | 27 Apr 2012 3:00 p.m. PST |
Sassanid Persia, just couldn't shake them off! |
Tiberius | 01 May 2012 5:16 a.m. PST |
|
freecloud | 01 May 2012 8:01 a.m. PST |
Of course the Goths et al that flattened Rome considerded themselves far more civilised – even "Roman" – than the declining and falling Romans. |