Help support TMP


"Identify this ACW officer" Topic


22 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery Limber

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes his initial Union force in 1:72nd scale.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Thoroughbred USS Monitor

The G Dog Fezian couldn't say 'no' to this opportunity!


Featured Profile Article

Battle Cry in Miniature

A Civil War boardgame is adapted to miniature wargaming.


Featured Book Review


1,316 hits since 23 Apr 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
MacSparty23 Apr 2012 4:35 p.m. PST

Several years ago, I inherited an album of carte de visites. These were purchased by a relative of mine, and I am quite sure none of the images are of relatives. Many are devoid of any clues, but one is in a Union Civil War uniform, and perhaps the good people at TMP can help identify him.

Additional clues:
1. Many of the CDVs are marked with photographer studios in Norwalk or Fremont, Ohio, with some from Kent and Ravenna. Norwalk and Fremont are in northern Ohio, near Sandusky, about halfway between Cleveland and Toledo.
2. Another photo has no photographer listed, but clear handwritten script of the time is labelled "Albert Bloomer, Wauseon, O." A quick Google search shows an Albert Bloomer of Wauseon, Ohio, served in the 55th Ohio, and indeed was wounded (lost a right leg) at Resaca, Ga.

Any ideas?

redbanner414523 Apr 2012 5:45 p.m. PST

He's a major general I think.

Dur Ecu23 Apr 2012 5:52 p.m. PST

He resembles Gen. Rutherford B. Hayes (who was from Ohio).

MacSparty23 Apr 2012 5:54 p.m. PST

Perhaps John Calvin Lee?
link

marcstorch23 Apr 2012 6:15 p.m. PST

Gen. James B. McPherson – See link
link
though it is an image and not an engraving as this cdv is!
Marc

MacSparty23 Apr 2012 6:25 p.m. PST

Marc – Good find, I think we have a winner. A quick search shows he attended Norwalk Academy in Ohio, which would certainly fit in with the other CDVs in this collection. Interesting that the other identified individual in the collection from Ohio also took part in the Atlanta campaign.

Looking through the collection is actually rather sad. I'm sure somewhere out there someone would love to have a photo of an ancestor, but I have no way of identifying the bulk of them.

the Gorb23 Apr 2012 6:41 p.m. PST

Not Hayes. There were over 100 Union generals who were either born in or who lived in Ohio when they joined the army. There were another hundred (or so) who were given the temporary rank of brevet brigadier general.

So while you might think the list to be short, it is actually quite long.

Regards, the Gorb

the Gorb23 Apr 2012 6:48 p.m. PST

I will agree with marcstorch who said General James B. McPherson.

Identical image here:
auction

and here:
auction

Seems to be a lot of that particular image floating around.

Regards, the Gorb

Campaigner123 Apr 2012 6:50 p.m. PST

Marc nailed it. I recognized the photo by sight as soon as I saw it. That is James B. McPherson, commander of the XVII Corps, killed at Atlanta in 1864, served under Sherman.

link

Campaigner

Campaigner123 Apr 2012 7:09 p.m. PST

McPherson was born near Clyde, Ohio, which was in Sandusky County. This would explain the CDV's being marked with the Norwalk and Fremont studio identifications, both studios being in Sandusky.

My best guess is that this photo was taken in Ohio, perhaps while McPherson was home on leave, and perhaps not long after he received his promotion to Major General in October of 1862. It would make sense that he would have his photo taken in his home state after his promotion. He also looks quite a bit less scruffy in this photo than he does in many of his 1863 and 1864 images, which would also lead me to believe this in an 1862 image shortly after he received his second star. He's neatly trimmed and spruced up, and somewhat thinner here than he appears a couple years later.

My best guess is that we are looking at an image of McPherson about seven months after the battle of Shiloh, in the late fall of 1862. He would have just shed his Brigadier General rank for that of Major General. Not long after this he received command of the XVII Corps.

Campaigner123 Apr 2012 7:20 p.m. PST

He also looks quite a bit less stressed and travelled in this image than he does in later images, which would lead me to further guess that this was McPherson before he took responsibility of corps command, and later army command.

In his later images, not only is his hair grown out, but he also developed that somewhat wild-eyed, intense look, as well as developing heavier bags under his eyes, as if the added stress of higher command was taking a toll on him physically.

You see that same kind of rapid, intensely stressed and aging look in General George Gordon Meade, particulary after 1863 into 1864.

Campaigner123 Apr 2012 7:29 p.m. PST

Here's the contrast in appearance I'm talking about. The link below is of McPherson, has to be in late 1863 or 1864. He's a markedly changed man physically from the earlier image. Compare this to the eyes and face in the earlier image.

link

marcstorch23 Apr 2012 7:29 p.m. PST

Having collected and done research on Civil War images for many years (Wisconsin, not Ohio!) I have seen many family albums with generals photos in them. Commonly someone would have photos of family, friends they served with, and then some of the Eastern or Western generals they served under (or a Lincoln) all in the album of postwar photos. The most amazing ones to see are when they collect their comrades' photos during the war – seeing album of fellows in uniform all from the same company and regiment is breath taking. It is too bad it isn't family of yours, it would be a great addition to your family tree if it was!
Marc

Campaigner123 Apr 2012 7:49 p.m. PST

I was looking at a few more images of McPherson during the war years. I am almost certain this is a newly promoted McPherson on or about October-November of 1862.

vtsaogames23 Apr 2012 8:06 p.m. PST

Thought he looked like McPherson.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP23 Apr 2012 8:13 p.m. PST

Another vote for McPherson.

Milhouse23 Apr 2012 8:26 p.m. PST

McPherson was my first instinct and I'll stick with that

firstvarty197923 Apr 2012 8:38 p.m. PST

He has a fairly well known square (and Metro stop) named for him in Washington, DC.

link

And a nice equestrian statue!

MacSparty24 Apr 2012 7:08 a.m. PST

Thank you all for helping solve the mystery.

Marc, those are some very interesting points. I should note here that this CDV was the first one in the album. It's then fascinating to wonder if this album belonged to a veteran, perhaps Albert Bloomer or a fellow soldier in the 55th Ohio? None of the other images are of anyone in uniform, and the bulk are a mix of men and women, of various ages. One group shot of four children with some illegible names. Perhaps a clue is written on an index page, "Oscar Millar." That name is listed twice, then Oscar twice more, like someone practicing penmanship.

Toward the back were some odds and ends, perhaps what passed for risque – "The Blonde" and "The Brunette." Perhaps most significantly, and what really attracted the attention of my wife, are the bizarre CDVs included, one of Chang and Eng in rather good condition, the Carolina Twins and the wild Australian children. There is also one of "Emancipation" and one really macabre drawing/painting of a hanging in what appears to be a jail. Strange.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2012 7:20 a.m. PST

In addition to the Washington, DC statue and equestrian statue, the Army's Fort McPherson in Atlanta was named for him. link

Jim

donlowry24 Apr 2012 1:56 p.m. PST

He was, of course, killed during the Battle of Atlanta.

John Michael Priest24 Apr 2012 2:06 p.m. PST

It looks like James McPherson.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.