Help support TMP


"1st Polotsk, 1812 w/ scenario" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonics Scenarios Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Battle Reports Message Board


700 hits since 7 Apr 2012
©1994-2014 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Gonsalvo Supporting Member of TMP08 Apr 2012 6:56 p.m. PST

for Field of Battle by Brent Oman; the battle report has a detailed explanation of how the mechanics of these rules work in the context of the game, that may be of particular interest if you've never played them.

link


picture

Hope you enjoy it!

Peter

Joe Fish Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2012 3:40 a.m. PST

Nice touch with the quotes in French and Cyrillic alphabets.

Personal logo Gonsalvo Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2012 4:36 a.m. PST

Since my French is minimal and my Russian non existent, Joe,hopefully Babelfish didn't butcher the translations too outrageously, LOL!

Peter

138SquadronRAF Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2012 5:14 a.m. PST

Interesting report of one of the often over looked actions of the 1812 campaign.

The only think that surprised me was that you rated St Cyr at the same level of skill as Oudinot, when everthing I've ever read indicates that 'The Owl' was the far better general.

StokieSteve Inactive Member09 Apr 2012 1:36 p.m. PST

Great report and lovely looking game Peter. Looks an interesting rule set too.

Personal logo Gonsalvo Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2012 2:33 p.m. PST

138Sqn:

Don't know if I'd agree that St Cyr was a "far better" general (although St Cyr himself certainly would have, generally having a high opinion of himself). A better general, I think so. He was not well liked by his fellow officers, while Oudinot generally was. not that that is necessarily a major criterion.

For Field of battle, the rating takes in both the overall quality of staff/comand, and the officer in question. Thus 1812 French have a statndard rating of "Skilled", with some Excellent and some Average. 1812 Russians have a standard rating of "Average", with some poor and some skilled. Even then, the Leadership Die type still undergoes some variation based on a D20 roll fpor each officer (good day, bad day, Chief of staff ill, etc).

So, I could go with Oudinot Average and St Cyr Skilled much more than Oudinot Skilled and St. Cyr Excellent – IMHO he certainly wasn't at the level of Davout, Lannes, Massena, or even Suchet or Eugene, maybe not Ney pre 1813 (and loss of Jomini as Chief of Staff). Overall, for the purposes of the game, I'll probably leave it as is.

Sorry - only trusted members can post on the forums.