Help support TMP


"The X-37B" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

No-Go-Zone


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Anyone Seen My Puck?

Lonewolf dcc Fezian returns to show us how he painted Hasslefree's Jess zombie-fighter.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


973 hits since 29 Mar 2012
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP29 Mar 2012 9:45 p.m. PST

"The U.S Air Force's highly secret unmanned space plane was supposed to stay in space for nine months, but it's now been there for a year and three days – and no one knows what it's doing.
The experimental craft has been circling Earth at 17,000 miles per hour and was due to land in California in December.
However the mission of the X-37B orbital test vehicle was extended – for unknown reasons…"

full article with pictures here.
link

Is this a military airplane or spaceship?

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1130 Mar 2012 1:52 a.m. PST

Perhaps it's an orbital fighter, to keep all those pesky UFO's/IFO's at bay.

Think Sky One, from SHADO, but parked in orbit, so it doesn't cede the "high ground" to the inbound craft.

bsrlee30 Mar 2012 3:20 a.m. PST

Another 'undocumented feature' in the software?

Like the Mars lander that had a mix up between miles and kilometers in the distance parameter – that must have hurt if it hit anything.

Lion in the Stars30 Mar 2012 4:09 a.m. PST

Is this a military airplane or spaceship?
Both.

It's owned by the military, but it's not much more than an unmanned version of the Space Shuttle with a much smaller payload bay. Frankly, the X37 could fit inside the Space Shuttle's cargo bay with room to spare!

It's not carrying anything big (it's payload bay is ~1.2m x 2.2m), but it is doing something.

commanderroj30 Mar 2012 6:41 a.m. PST

Maybe it is just broken. Or a big bluff-its not a very secret, secret project!

richarDISNEY30 Mar 2012 7:00 a.m. PST

Fnord.
Smoke and Mirrors.
"Lookie what I have over here…But don't mind my other hand.."
"Ignore the man behind the curtain…"

Apply tin foil hat now… laugh
beer

PapaSync30 Mar 2012 7:01 a.m. PST

The Red button is STUCK!.

8)

Eclectic Wave30 Mar 2012 7:41 a.m. PST

Boeing Aircraft (The makers of the X-37B) is trying to decide if they want to make a X-37C version – Manned.

Just Google X-37C

Also this statement

"However, analysts have pointed out that surveillance would be tricky, since the spacecraft would rush past each other at thousands of metres per second."

Oh and all the PRACTICE our Airforce has had using spy camera's in space photographing things on the ground when the satillite moves at 'thousands of metres per second' doesn't apply in this situation. Riiiiight.

Patrick R30 Mar 2012 7:48 a.m. PST

Spying, anti-satelite, picking up Andromeda strain, looking for winning lottery numbers or tallying up crashed UFO's, take your pick …

DocMagus30 Mar 2012 7:55 a.m. PST

I think it's an experiment in cryostasis, somebody is in the payload bay, when they land he gets unfrozen, if he lives, they make the next trip longer.
In 10 years you will have a New Virgin company dealing with sending you into the future for only $10 USDm. Space pops :)

But this is just my guess

Lion in the Stars30 Mar 2012 10:22 a.m. PST

Well, I would *like* it to have a targeting system and some kinetics, waiting to cause an 'unfortunate accident' when DPRK goes to launch that 'satellite' in two weeks.

But I highly doubt that is the reason.

Lentulus30 Mar 2012 11:49 a.m. PST

but it's now been there for a year and three days

Of course, the most likely explanation is that they can't get the engine to light for deorbit.

Timbo W30 Mar 2012 1:58 p.m. PST

I say we take off and……….

Aapsych2030 Mar 2012 6:59 p.m. PST

It's the only way to be sure.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.