| John the OFM | 01 Mar 2012 7:22 a.m. PST |
Is saying that to a fellow TMPer a DH offense? Or, is it acceptable TMP abuse, covered under a broad interpretation of the Haddockism whimsy umbrella? |
| John the OFM | 01 Mar 2012 7:23 a.m. PST |
It also occurs to me that this might be an Americanism.
Is it used in the land of the Angles, Saxons and Britons? |
| Lego Warrior | 01 Mar 2012 7:38 a.m. PST |
If you are aged 3 years old – which in my case I am and I'm guessing so are most tmper's LOL The Doctor Ye Olde London |
| Mooseworks8 | 01 Mar 2012 7:39 a.m. PST |
|
| GeoffQRF | 01 Mar 2012 7:40 a.m. PST |
Surely not if it's true. :-) Although there are lots of other things that people use that could also be true, yet are still DHable (it's a real word) so I shall go with… "maybe" |
| epturner | 01 Mar 2012 7:56 a.m. PST |
|
| flooglestreet | 01 Mar 2012 7:56 a.m. PST |
|
| SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 01 Mar 2012 7:57 a.m. PST |
I think maybe is a safe answer. |
| flooglestreet | 01 Mar 2012 8:00 a.m. PST |
|
| skippy0001 | 01 Mar 2012 8:10 a.m. PST |
Am not! Mommy! TMP'ers are sayin' I'm a fibber! Make them stop!!!! |
| John the OFM | 01 Mar 2012 8:25 a.m. PST |
|
| Henrix | 01 Mar 2012 9:05 a.m. PST |
There's not enough coffee in the world, K-blue. |
| Dynaman8789 | 01 Mar 2012 9:15 a.m. PST |
It has to be OK, it is not possible to use Sticks and Stones through the net… |
| epturner | 01 Mar 2012 9:20 a.m. PST |
And John is poking me…. And I can always use a cup of coffee or tea. Eric |
| John the Greater | 01 Mar 2012 9:24 a.m. PST |
You kids knock it off RIGHT NOW! Or I'll turn the car around…I'm not fooling. Ummmm….what was the question again? |
| Feet up now | 01 Mar 2012 10:26 a.m. PST |
Liar, liar
Your pants on fire
Your hair's sticking up
Your Ass is for hire sang it at secondry school 20+ years ago and we did not get detention for it then. |
| Lentulus | 01 Mar 2012 10:27 a.m. PST |
How about a burning trousers icon to go with  ? |
| John the OFM | 01 Mar 2012 10:38 a.m. PST |
|
| Charles Marlow | 01 Mar 2012 11:24 a.m. PST |
I think you should be able to politely express your disbelief in regards to something a fellow TMPer has said… Are we "allowed"? |
| Gennorm | 01 Mar 2012 11:26 a.m. PST |
Only if neither is a gentleman. |
| GreyONE | 01 Mar 2012 11:32 a.m. PST |
I don't think reciting the Castaway song will cause anyone any problems: YouTube link |
| Dynaman8789 | 01 Mar 2012 11:59 a.m. PST |
> Only if neither is a gentleman. 100% OK every time for TMP members then. |
| Cerdic | 01 Mar 2012 12:10 p.m. PST |
The saying is used here in Britain. The image it produces is more interesting though as we use the word 'pants' to mean underwear! |
| OldGrenadier at work | 01 Mar 2012 12:41 p.m. PST |
I'm suddenly reminded of a Progressive Insurance commercial. "No mas pantalones." |
| Mako11 | 01 Mar 2012 12:55 p.m. PST |
Statings facts, and/or opinions should not be DHable. |
| Sparker | 01 Mar 2012 1:53 p.m. PST |
I think the acceptable parliamentary usage is to suggest that the honourable gentleman is being 'economical with the verite'… |
 Doctor X  | 01 Mar 2012 2:22 p.m. PST |
Why this fascination on the DH and what constitutes an offenses? Just post and be done with it. |
| Ed Mohrmann | 01 Mar 2012 3:32 p.m. PST |
Perhaps: 'X is a user of strong drink, and the truth is
not in him.' |
| Grizzlymc | 01 Mar 2012 4:18 p.m. PST |
Whyu should strong drink affect the truth, en vino veritas! |
| richarDISNEY | 01 Mar 2012 5:20 p.m. PST |
Wouldn't that be considered trolling?
 |
| J Womack 94 | 02 Mar 2012 10:13 a.m. PST |
"Sir, not being informed to the highest degree of accuracy, I hesitate to articulate for fear that I might deviate from the true course of rectitude." I.e., I don't know. |
| Grand Duke Natokina | 02 Mar 2012 2:56 p.m. PST |
|
| number4 | 02 Mar 2012 8:25 p.m. PST |
Don't make me pull this thread over! |
