"Spearhead AAR - WW2 in 6mm" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Battle Reports Message Board Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral World War Two on the Land World War Two at Sea
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleMal Wright 's first experience with 1:4800 scale naval models.
Featured Profile ArticleThis tool makes it easier to fold paper.
Current Poll
|
Greg B | 27 Feb 2012 1:49 p.m. PST |
Hello again – we've posted a new AAR to our blog. This one was for a game of Spearhead, played in 6mm scale, set during the German Kursk offensive. Full post here: link Some teaser pics for folks who dislike links:
As always, thanks for looking! Greg |
Angel Barracks | 27 Feb 2012 2:27 p.m. PST |
Good report, a nice big table too. Would you elaborate on this though please? Sadly the scenario books available for the game are chock full of unplayable encounters I have never bought any scenarios for any games so would be interested in knowing just how/why they were bad.
|
Greg B | 27 Feb 2012 3:02 p.m. PST |
@Angel Barracks – I find the scenario books frustrating in that they offer huge scenarios, which the majority of gamers would ever struggle to assemble the relevant figures or find the time to play the game. Spearhead is a division-level game, but that doesn't mean every game needs to have a division on each side to be fun. The books are interesting from a research perspective, but as a presentation of things you might realistically play with your group, they are far out of reach. I would love to get/see a scenario book that had encounters much closer to the size of the sample scenarios in the Spearhead rulebook – a few battalion-sized units on each side, maybe just one battalion per side sometimes. Not every scenario has to have most of a division on the table. |
RobH | 27 Feb 2012 3:18 p.m. PST |
Great looking battle, I really like the basing
I have taken the exact same approach :). Spearhead scenarios are pretty big and tend to work best as multi player. For some alternatives take a look at the free scenario lists on the GHQ site. They are at a lower level than Spearhead and easy to expand if you want. IMHO still the best rules for games of this size and complexity (WW2 and WW1 and Modern too!) |
Martin Rapier | 28 Feb 2012 2:22 a.m. PST |
"I would love to get/see a scenario book that had encounters much closer to the size of the sample scenarios in the Spearhead rulebook – a few battalion-sized units on each side, maybe just one battalion per side sometimes. Not every scenario has to have most of a division on the table." If you want smaller games the TAC Publications Eastern Front book has plenty of sub-division scenarios (although it still has some division sized ones). The SH one is OK, you could always bathtub the provided scenarios if you haven;t got time/space. The OBs are largely made up in any case, as are the maps, just use them as a guide to force mix etc. Bob Mackenzies numerous Command Decision scenarios would work OK for smaller SH games too, as would Rapid Fire ones. link link |
Greg B | 28 Feb 2012 6:50 a.m. PST |
@ Martin – those are great links. Thanks! |
Martin Rapier | 28 Feb 2012 8:36 a.m. PST |
I'm glad you like them. I do like brigade level WW2 games, and Bob has done some corking scenarios. I'd recommend the TAC Publications book as well (I think Irregular sells it), it includes a very jolly mini-campaign covering the siege of Tarnopol. Well, maybe not very jolly for the participants. |
twowheatons | 28 Feb 2012 9:57 a.m. PST |
|
|