Cardinal Hawkwood | 21 Feb 2012 2:57 p.m. PST |
sort of pinched from the Fireforge website but valid I think.. I go with the Childrens' Crusade link& The Crusade of Nicopolis (1396) organized by Sigismund of Luxemburg, king of Hungary, culminated in the Battle of Nicopolis then to further to help kick off this one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades |
Garand | 21 Feb 2012 3:06 p.m. PST |
Personally I'm more interested in the 1st and Northern Crusades. Damon. |
Inari7 | 21 Feb 2012 3:06 p.m. PST |
The Third Crusade Third Crusade (1189–1192) I like the Battle of Arsuf where Richard I of England defeated Saladin. A Very important battle afterwards Richard was able to secure Jerusalem from Jaffa the closest port. Two great men from history battling for supremacy, whats not to like.
|
religon | 21 Feb 2012 3:15 p.m. PST |
I have interest in the Mamluks. This makes the 9th Crusade, the threat of a French-Mongol alliance, the related Battle of Ain Jalut (1260) and the fall of Acre (1291) of great interest to me. I have only ran one game in this period, a crushing defeat for the Mamluks. |
rampantlion | 21 Feb 2012 3:17 p.m. PST |
Either the first or third. The first is fascinating with all of the factions that were somewhat working together, but also independent forces that didn't necessarily trust or like each other that much. Guess the same could be said for the third crusade seeing the troubles that Richard got himself into on his attempt to return home. Allen |
French Wargame Holidays | 21 Feb 2012 3:21 p.m. PST |
first and third for me also First for all of the bickering and the third for the same reason cheers matt |
Mrs Pumblechook | 21 Feb 2012 3:28 p.m. PST |
Albigenisian Crusades. What did the Cathars ever do to anyone. |
Ambush Alley Games | 21 Feb 2012 3:28 p.m. PST |
First and Third here, too. |
Frothers Did It And Ran Away | 21 Feb 2012 3:29 p.m. PST |
First because it was such an astonishing achievement for the time; Northern/Baltic for unusual cool factor and the second of Louis IX's crusades (8th?) for bizarre factor – liberate Jerusalem by putting your army at the service of the King of Sicily (who happens to be your younger brother) to chastise his Tunisian vassal (1500 miles from Jerusalem) and then poo yourself to death two days after arrival. Result! |
SgtPerry | 21 Feb 2012 3:30 p.m. PST |
Albigensian Crusade, locations are only 500 miles from here. Some no longer exist others are still here like the city of Carcassonne ( visited it 20 years ago). Olivier |
Patrick Sexton | 21 Feb 2012 3:33 p.m. PST |
|
redbanner4145 | 21 Feb 2012 3:39 p.m. PST |
|
MajorB | 21 Feb 2012 3:41 p.m. PST |
4th Crusade. It never even got as far as the Holy Land! |
mad monkey 1 | 21 Feb 2012 4:04 p.m. PST |
|
John the Greater | 21 Feb 2012 4:37 p.m. PST |
Gotta go with the Ninth Crusade. Mongols – what's not to like? |
SonofThor | 21 Feb 2012 4:55 p.m. PST |
Baltic Crusades, gotta love the Teutonic Knights! |
Chris Rance | 21 Feb 2012 5:00 p.m. PST |
Northern Crusades for me too – rereading Eric Christiansen's book at the moment. |
FingerandToeGlenn | 21 Feb 2012 5:20 p.m. PST |
Fourth. Gotta love the capitalistic Venetians and an army that somehow missed Egypt and ended up in Constantinople. |
Pedrobear | 21 Feb 2012 6:02 p.m. PST |
The First. Also of interest to me is the period around 1261, with the restored Byzantine Empire and Mongols in the picture – perfect setting for a campaign. |
Ten Fingered Jack | 21 Feb 2012 6:05 p.m. PST |
|
21eRegt | 21 Feb 2012 6:08 p.m. PST |
3rd Crusade. Great leaders, great action, great history. |
Waco Joe | 21 Feb 2012 7:19 p.m. PST |
Albigenisian followed by the Reconquista. |
Mako11 | 21 Feb 2012 8:22 p.m. PST |
I like the 3rd, due to their improved helms and armor. |
McKinstry | 21 Feb 2012 9:28 p.m. PST |
The Third followed by the First. |
Texas Grognard | 21 Feb 2012 9:29 p.m. PST |
Fourth Crusade as the Doge of Venice has got to be the greatset con man in history. Salut y'all! Bruce the Texas Grognard |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 22 Feb 2012 1:02 a.m. PST |
All of them actually! Love the Panoply of the Knights in their liveries. |
rvandusen | 22 Feb 2012 6:11 a.m. PST |
First Crusade. I like 11th/early 12 c. armor |
StCrispin | 22 Feb 2012 7:36 a.m. PST |
third. as for miniatures though, i would like later ones, since i am a hundred years war gamer and long for cheap plastic knights! |
Paul Y | 22 Feb 2012 8:28 a.m. PST |
First. Downhill all the way after that. |
yorkie o1 | 22 Feb 2012 9:05 a.m. PST |
|
just visiting | 22 Feb 2012 12:12 p.m. PST |
The First is my absolute fixation period: but I enjoy them all. @Inari:
Richard was able to secure Jerusalem from Jaffa the closest port. Richard did not "secure Jerusalem" after the 3rd Crusade; Jerusalem remained in Muslim hands after 1187 until emperor Frederick II obtained it in 1229 for a scant fifteen years by treaty
. |
Orlock | 22 Feb 2012 3:16 p.m. PST |
|
Perris0707 | 22 Feb 2012 9:51 p.m. PST |
First. Love the factions involved and the look of the period. |
Willtij | 22 Feb 2012 11:53 p.m. PST |
First and third for me as well. |
Oh Bugger | 23 Feb 2012 12:55 a.m. PST |
The First for me and let me take this opportunity to give Runciman's history a plug. |
20thmaine | 23 Feb 2012 5:29 a.m. PST |
Fourth Crusade – oh those devious Venitians ! |
Inkpaduta | 23 Feb 2012 12:05 p.m. PST |
Although I am sure you are talking about the Holy Land I would ahve to go with the Baltic Crusades. I think this is a rich area for wargamers that has, overall, gone unnoticed. |
ricepot | 23 Feb 2012 11:04 p.m. PST |
|