Help support TMP


"Plastic Soldier Company Stug III in 1/100 scale" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Flames of War Message Board

Back to the WWII Models Review Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

CombatPainter Makes a Barbed Wire Section

combatpainter Fezian has been watching some documentaries lately set in the Western Desert, and was inspired to create this...


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's 1:100 Wespe Artillery Battery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at another D-Day: German set for Flames of War.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,684 hits since 10 Feb 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Anton Ryzbak10 Feb 2012 10:13 p.m. PST

I just finished building one of each of these little gems and they are really rather amazing little kits; here is my review of the set link

I simply cannot see myself going back to metal after building the PSC kits, the detail is far better with plastic and the price is far lower.

Garand10 Feb 2012 10:21 p.m. PST

I agree. they are nice kits.

I did want to mention that you have the wrong hatches for the wrong versions. The version with the remote MG should have hatches that opened out to the sides, while the one with the MG shield should have hatches that opened front to back (indeed the front hatch had a hook on it that engaged the gun shield, and acted as a support for it). Also I believe the side opening hatches were designed so that when open they stayed vertical, to give the gunner protection when reloading the MG.

Damon.

Anton Ryzbak10 Feb 2012 10:35 p.m. PST

Thanks, I was set right by my gaming buddies AFTER I had built the models and posted that bit. The instructions are truly sad when it comes to that point. I still like the kits and I am building a Stug III company for FoW @ 1944.

helmet10111 Feb 2012 12:50 a.m. PST

I like your review ("I ran out of superlatives"…)

Unfortunately, I'm fully loaded with BF's STUGs, nice models by the way. But yes, PSC are rapidly becoming my models of choice (sdkfz 251, T-34 and soon panthers and shermans). I'm impatiently waiting for the US halftracks.

VonTed11 Feb 2012 5:34 a.m. PST

That does look nice, even has crew. Very cool.

sgt Dutch11 Feb 2012 6:27 a.m. PST

The Stug F is an late model F/8. Great how to article. If I get going hope to have picture of a early Stug F. Did this by using the rear decking off the Panzer III. Also just got the new Panthers in the mail. On word WOW.. The panther is the best so part…

CPBelt11 Feb 2012 6:41 a.m. PST

I love your blog. The process shots in all your posts are very helpful. I know how much time and devotion it takes to stop working, take the photos, jot down notes, write them up, ect. Thanks again!

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP11 Feb 2012 9:45 a.m. PST

If I ever decide to drop down to 15mm, I think PSC is going to be my primary choice of manufacturers.

Anton Ryzbak11 Feb 2012 10:38 a.m. PST

79thPA

PSC are making (or planning on making) these models in 1/72 as well, the beauties of CAD design and CNC driven machinery, once you have the design you can build it in any scale!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.