
"Comparing 15mm Gauls: Tin Soldier and Xyston" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Product Reviews Message Board
Action Log
03 Feb 2012 6:46 a.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Comparing 15mm Gauls: Tin Solder and Xyston" to "Comparing 15mm Gauls: Tin Soldier and Xyston"
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Using pink stuff for basework.
|
| Temporary like Achilles | 02 Feb 2012 9:20 p.m. PST |
Hello, I've posted a few comparison shots on my blog showing unpainted Tin Soldier and Xyston 15mm Gallic infantry together. My verdict – the infantry go well together, but the cavalry don't. You can see for yourself here: link If anyone has mixed, or is considering mixing TS and Xyston, I'd be keen to hear your opinion. Edit – aargh, I wonder if the editor could correct the spelling of Tin 'Solder' to Tin 'Soldier' for me? Cheers, Aaron |
| General Montcalm | 04 Feb 2012 4:54 a.m. PST |
Nope, have to disagree. I looked at doing this too, but mixing a second hand Tin Soldier army with a second hand Xyston one. The result would have been appaling and I kept teh two seperate and sold them both on. The Tin Soldier are massive compared to Xyston Celts. I think your photography shows that for all of them except the Chieftain with the horned helmet, who is probably one of the smallest Tin Soldier figures anyway. Its not just the height, but the bulk and width of the Tin Soldier ones that are the problem. Now they would probably work well on their own as opponants for the similarly scale creeped out Xyston Romans though. |
| Temporary like Achilles | 04 Feb 2012 8:26 a.m. PST |
Thanks General M, objection noted. You're right with packs C3 and C4, but I still think the others match pretty well. I've edited the post to include your contrary opinion and to urge a more careful approach :) Thanks again, Aaron |
|