Help support TMP


"Looking for Comparison Pics of Perry & Kingsford Samurai" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tactica


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Cavalry

Don't let the horses daunt you!


Current Poll


2,800 hits since 26 Jan 2012
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Correus26 Jan 2012 9:19 p.m. PST

Hello everyone!

I've heard that the Perry & Kingsford Samurai mix well together, however, I've yet to find some comparison pics. Do any of you have some or know where some can be found?

Thanks!

Scottjm26 Jan 2012 9:27 p.m. PST

I don't have any pics, but I've found the Perry figs to be noticeably smaller than the Kingsford figs. I know people come in all shapes and sizes but for me it's a little too much. I'd like my units to be uniform.

Lowtardog27 Jan 2012 4:29 a.m. PST

Here you go, I recently found this site myself, everything samurai manufacturer relatesd and a real gem

link

I am on my way of the warrior collecting unarmoured samurai and bandits etc, so far Perry, Museum miniatures (nicer n the flesh than on their site) a few westwind, Black Hat (cracking range) and a few dixon ronin on their way

Dr Mathias Fezian27 Jan 2012 6:23 a.m. PST

Perry are indeed noticeably smaller. The detail is not as good on Perry though. I've painted over a hundred Perry samurai, and I have to say I prefer the lacing on Kingsford figures. As always, the Perry figures have poses that feel more 'lifelike'. They each have their good points.

If you're doing skirmish with individuals I think they mix fine, mixing them in block formations is something I wouldn't do.

Correus27 Jan 2012 8:04 a.m. PST

Well, the lacing is what bothers me with the Perry sculpts. I really like their sculpts but the lacing is lacking.

The Odoshi lacing patterns are one of the big draws for me and the Perry minis just don't seem to have enough to create some of the more interesting patterns.

I guess Kingsford is more along the Kebiki odoshi style and Perry the Sugake odoshi style.

Take a look at these:

link

link

I only have a handful of the Perry miniatures right now and they all appear to be the Sugake odoshi. I can't tell from the pics of the minis on their web site, but are any of them like the Kebiki odoshi? If not, I was hoping to mix a few of the Kingsford in in-order to have that style.

@Dr Mathias – would you rather go Kingsford over Perry?

DeanMoto27 Jan 2012 8:48 a.m. PST

Most of the Perry samurai in "modern" armor – which characteristically reduced lacing. In fact, some even have what appear to be rivets for the cuirass plates – this is also historically accurate. I think the two mix fine. Dean

picture

Correus27 Jan 2012 9:33 a.m. PST

@DeanMoto – thanks for the pic. The cavalry seem to match better than the foot. I guess I could buy a pack and look.

DeanMoto27 Jan 2012 9:57 a.m. PST

Correus:

I'd say the Kingsford horses are actually smaller (or shorter legged) – which reflects the historical record. Again, I'd have no problem mixing the two companies. In fact, I'll be getting some more Kingsford in the near future to join the Perry ranks. Dean

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.