Help support TMP


"Paul Kruger's Submarine " Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board

Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board

Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Turkish Keyk-Class Patrol Digs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally dips his toe into the world of Aeronef.


Featured Profile Article

New Gate

sargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,498 hits since 25 Jan 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

BullDog6925 Jan 2012 5:29 a.m. PST

Can any of the great minds of TMP assist me?

A friend has just told me that he remembers a story about the Transvaal's Paul Kruger buying a patent / plans for a submarine prior to the Boer War. He says this was in 'Engineering News' some time in the early 1990s. I don't suppose anyone can confirm that, and a quick Google has drawn a blank. But does anyone have any other references to this?

Though the Transvaal was land-locked, the claim is not as farcical as it seems. An ex-Italian Naval officer in the service of the Boers proposed the Transvaal should acquire four submarines and base these in German South West Africa to attack British troops ships en route to the Cape. (Rosenthal, 1975, pp.121-122) 'The Best of Eric Rosenthal'

Any ideas?

Mooseworks825 Jan 2012 6:34 a.m. PST

Sounds like a good read.

Hazkal25 Jan 2012 6:44 a.m. PST

I was about to say- the Transvaal was landlocked! Given the amount invested into the latest artillery and rifles it doesn't seem outside of reason- I too would like to see any references.

bsrlee25 Jan 2012 7:02 a.m. PST

Uncle Paul was a devious old….err…individual, so I wouldn't put it past him to have spent a few schillings on some plans, just to keep the Uitlanders guessing. But serious efforts? No. Even the Kaiser – or at least his advisors – knew not to get involved with Great Britain at that time.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP25 Jan 2012 7:59 a.m. PST

Basing submarines out of a German colony to attack British shipping cannot be seen as anything but an act of war.

Texas Jack25 Jan 2012 12:42 p.m. PST

Basing submarines out of a German colony to attack British shipping cannot be seen as anything but an act of war.

Hmmmm, I feel a scenario coming on…

Lion in the Stars25 Jan 2012 4:54 p.m. PST

Basing submarines out of a German colony to attack British shipping cannot be seen as anything but an act of war.

As a wargamer, you say that like it's a bad thing, John!

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP25 Jan 2012 5:23 p.m. PST

grin
And I play VSF too!
And the good news for Britain is that von Lettow-Vorbeck is a simple lieutenant in China.

tuscaloosa25 Jan 2012 9:05 p.m. PST

"I was about to say- the Transvaal was landlocked!"

You have to admit – they'd have surprise on their side!

BullDog6925 Jan 2012 10:21 p.m. PST

Ah – but the Transvaal has spent the previous 15 years desperately trying not to be land-locked and, indeed, their objectives when they started the Second Boer War were Cape Town and Durban. So maybe Kruger was thinking long term. If he already had a sub or two based in German SW Africa, they could move into place.

freecloud31 Jan 2012 2:54 a.m. PST

From the Transvaal to Delagoa Bay (Mocambique) is but a day away after the 1895 railway to Pretoria was built…..

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.