Help support TMP


"“Line vs. Column," Redux" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting 1:700 Black Seas French Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints his first three ships from the starter set.


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


1,596 hits since 19 Nov 2011
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Grognard178919 Nov 2011 3:27 p.m. PST

"Line vs. Column," Redux (Napoleonic Tactics) by Me! A work in progress! It will take me a while to get it all posted with improved pictures and video. Enjoy,

link

Chris Maine

Clovis Sangrail19 Nov 2011 6:36 p.m. PST

Chris,

Some interesting information there.

CS

Maxshadow19 Nov 2011 7:20 p.m. PST

Thanks Chris for endeavouring to bring some clarity to this.
Though I ended up becoming mesmerised by the Waterloo clip.
I don't know who's idea it was to use wargames figures to illustrate the formations but it works well.
Max

Grognard178920 Nov 2011 12:19 a.m. PST

Thanks for the comments! All of the pics, etc… are items I've collected over the years to try and make some sense of it all. What it basically boils down to is Mass! Plus Napoleon & his commanders excellent use of skirmishing tactics and artillery. Probably more research needs to be done on the use of Cavalry in the mix as well. I was just trying mainly here to figure out infantry tactics. I think it also has to do with the scale/size of the units too. A Battalion seems a lot easier to comprehend for me than the massive Division sized elements. Cheers,

Chris

PS: Lot's more to come, Stay tuned!

JeffsaysHi21 Nov 2011 6:51 a.m. PST

That is very impressive – especially after getting burnt down, which I hope you are recovering from now.

One thing I would like to add is prompted by mention of Volley & counter charge in defence.
Maybe it was Oman who termed it a 'British' tactic, not sure; but it wasn't it was a universal 18thC tactic.
Just that only British organised troops (including Germans & Portuguese) managed to pull it off frequently enough in the Napoleonic era.
What it was was a high stress tactic, rather like lying down till needed, or deploying from column to return fire.
High stress tactics need a sufficiency of quality command in the right places. A look at the distribution and numbers of officer, senior NCOs in the different formations and nations shows quite direct co-relation between that and tactics that worked well for each of them.

That also works all the way up the chain and a comparison of the distinct appointments and ordered roles in a Prussian Brigade post 1812 with the vagueness of 1806 is also noticeable.

Looking forward to more of your work.

Jeff Lewis

Glenn Pearce21 Nov 2011 10:34 a.m. PST

Hello Chris!

I'm in awe of your presentation. An amazing piece of work.
Please keep us updated.

Best regards,

Glenn

14Bore Supporting Member of TMP21 Nov 2011 2:40 p.m. PST

Looks like a labor of love, thanks

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.