"Rate the Fluff: the Grey Knights" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Warhammer 40K Message Board
Action Log
11 Apr 2015 7:37 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleAdam uses stark highlighting for a 'cartoony' style with these DemonBlade figures.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Editor in Chief Bill | 17 Nov 2011 6:41 p.m. PST |
On a scale of 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), how would you rate the fluff (background fiction) from the Grey Knights codex for Warhammer 40,000? |
jpattern2 | 17 Nov 2011 6:46 p.m. PST |
Jokaero: 10 Everything else: 0-meh Love me some tech-savant apes, I do. |
ScoutII | 17 Nov 2011 10:24 p.m. PST |
The new stuff – what I have read so far
somewhere between 0 and 3. It seems that they have sort of given up on deep thoughts for the core of GW background in favor of fan fiction written by 6th graders. Considering that is their target audience though, it might not be too bad of a path. |
Wolfprophet | 18 Nov 2011 4:43 p.m. PST |
1. It was really really weak considering the fluff-rich world it was drawn from. "It seems that they have sort of given up on deep thoughts for the core of GW background in favor of fan fiction written by 6th graders. Considering that is their target audience though, it might not be too bad of a path."
Yeah, I noticed the changes from 4th to 5th edition for the Imperial Guard included removal of chem inhalents and renaming Hellguns to "Hot-shots"
. Utter blasphemy I say! And if I'm not mistaken, the new Dark Eldar lack combat drugs, don't they? |
|