Help support TMP


"BTR-50 with rear MG? Standard?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Amazon's Bad Kids

At Christmas, the good kids get presents. Ever wondered what happened to the bad kids?


Featured Profile Article

Ammunition Hill 1967

Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


1,927 hits since 9 Nov 2011
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Count Belisarius09 Nov 2011 5:31 a.m. PST

I've got a few GHQ BTR-50s (code W21). There appears to be a small hole center read between the hatches and an MG supplied to fit in it. Doesn't appear to be shown in the GHQ site pic either.

I've google a few images and a I can't find one with this setup? Was it standard?

Cheers

Andy

Dances with Clydesdales09 Nov 2011 7:53 a.m. PST

At one time those were packaged with SPG-9 recoiless rifles, and 82mm mortars to mount in the holes on those castings. I don't recall ever seeing a MG mounted there.

Count Belisarius09 Nov 2011 1:12 p.m. PST

The model comes with what looks like a tripod mounted MG that sits right in the middle of the rear compartment area. I assume to be used when the hatches are open in support of the deploying troops?

Just trying to decide whether to stick it on or fill the hole!

Andy

thatguy9609 Nov 2011 1:48 p.m. PST

Are you sure its not a recoilless rifle? Can you take a picture?

Like this:

picture

That's an Egyptian OT-62B in the picture, but the setup would've been the same for the BTR-50PK. The BTR-50 series could also be fitted with a DShk MG up front too.

Dances with Clydesdales09 Nov 2011 2:50 p.m. PST

Seems this was hashed out in the past on TMP. Maybe this will be usefull.

TMP link

Count Belisarius09 Nov 2011 3:38 p.m. PST

Ahhh.. I was sure I'd done a search for btr-50 and nothing came up. That's a useful thread. Thanks.

It's likely the GHQ models I have are old stock as they were 'spare' from someones collection. I thought I'd post the pics anyway:

picture

picture

picture

I don't think there is conclusive evidence for this particular setup. I've not turned anything up online. Though you would like to think there was some evidence for GHQ to have produced it! The reference to being aimed at Arab-Israeli Wars may be useful given captured use/modding by Israel?

Still can't decide… :)

Andy

Aapsych2009 Nov 2011 4:57 p.m. PST

The putative "machine gun" is in fact a rearward pointed SPG-9 (which comes standard in the GHQ BTR-50 package) with most of its barrel missing and the remaining back end bit appearing to resemble a water cooled Maxim (similar to the Vickers or M1917 Browning) machine gun pointed forward.

By the time of the introduction of the BTR-50, the Maxim was almost, if not completely, extinct in frontline service, and its replacement, the SG-43/SG-M air cooled machine gun was fired from the BTR-50's troop compartment using a pintle mount. I am also unaware of any Maxim tripod mountings in Soviet service, though the SPG-9, as the photo above amply demonstrates, was almost ubiquitously mounted on the wheeled tripod combination carriage.

Dances with Clydesdales09 Nov 2011 4:59 p.m. PST

That's exactly what was supplied with mine, except yours is facing rear with the gun barrel cut or broken off. It originally was a bit longer.

I have 10 of these I mainly used for AIW. I ended up using 2 with SPG-9 RR and 2 with 82mm mortar, the other 6, I use as regular infantry carriers. The extra weapons I used with some infantry for weapons stands.

I think you have an older pack as do I. I bought mine sometime in the 1980's.

Count Belisarius09 Nov 2011 11:23 p.m. PST

That's excellent info, thanks. Given the 'gun' may have been truncated anyway I think I'll just fill the hole and use them as is…

Thanks again

Andy

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.