"Battle Report from the DBA competition at Conquest 2011" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Wargaming in New Zealand Message Board Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Ancients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Rating: 
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Mark Davies | 03 Nov 2011 7:08 p.m. PST |
The brief report and pictures of my Seleucids at Conquest 2011: link |
korsun0  | 04 Nov 2011 6:54 p.m. PST |
Sounds like a load of fun. Fought like a true Seleucid; plenty of promise but lost the empire anyway!….:) |
| Mark Davies | 05 Nov 2011 2:37 a.m. PST |
Thanks! So true! I'm reminded of the anecdote of Hannibal after being shown a review of Antiochus' army--all those silver shields, etc. Antiochus asked Hannibal if it'd be enough, to which Hannibal replied, 'Perhaps, but the Romans are very greedy!'. All display and no substance! |
| sumerandakkad | 05 Nov 2011 4:49 a.m. PST |
I see you normally divide the two phalanx. Not something I normally do. Is this the reason for your troubles?
I like the AAR's you provide. |
| Mark Davies | 05 Nov 2011 11:57 a.m. PST |
I don't think so. The idea of the divided phalanx is that the element between it is likely to have double overlaps after the pike have pushed back their opponents. Not so good in the game against the Graeco-Bactrians, but that was because I shouldn't have left the elephant to face the auxilia. |
|
finally paints the first of his Gauls...
