28mmMan | 13 Oct 2011 5:57 p.m. PST |
Would you choose an alien race if there were no real +/- bonus? Just a superficial choice
human or "insert" 8' but skinny and same strength as human range deep green/red/blue/yellow/etc. skin antennas (weak ears but antenna compensate) big eyes (human standard reverse, strong night vision weak day vision) etc. Basically the Star Trek/Roddenberry forehead alien rule of thumb
be as weird as you like but have a clear view of the eyes or the audience will not connect with the character. So your choice is same stats range but the form can be modified
within a humans being 50/50 of common population
everyone has a vote and there is no more or less prejudice for being human, mutant, or alien
which would you choose? Certainly no right or wrong here. I find this sort of canvas rather interesting as a whole. That some players gravitate one way or another for various reasons, those factors are intriguing to me. Thanks for playing along. Please feel free to include a pic of the alien/mutant/etc. that draws your consideration if you lean that way :) |
Mako11 | 13 Oct 2011 6:37 p.m. PST |
Perhaps, for a change of pace. |
Ancestral Hamster | 13 Oct 2011 6:52 p.m. PST |
Depends on the aesthetic. If that species is interesting looking, or has cool or impressive looking ships/AFVs, then I might play it regardless. In existing SF canon, I usually play Klingons or Romulans. The former for the direct approach to warfare, the latter for byzantine plotting before waging war. |
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 13 Oct 2011 7:12 p.m. PST |
I don't subscribe to the "forehead appliance" view of aliens. I like my aliens bizarre
the harder it is for me to wrap my head around them, the more likely I am to play them. |
28mmMan | 13 Oct 2011 7:48 p.m. PST |
Oh I am with you my bizarre brother from another weird mother (no insult it just rhymed :) Really strange is loads of fun
for this example you could look like anything you would like
the stats would stay within human ranges of high and low
go for it. :) |
skippy0001 | 13 Oct 2011 9:23 p.m. PST |
As long as the culture, society and tech was equally as alien. |
28mmMan | 13 Oct 2011 10:00 p.m. PST |
hmmm I suspect as the setting is 50/50 human standard, not so weird or alien :) |
Angel Barracks | 13 Oct 2011 10:41 p.m. PST |
No, but then I always prefer humans even if they have the worse stats. BUT if there were aliens in my games I would have no issue with stat neutral aliens being in it. |
Zardoz | 14 Oct 2011 6:10 a.m. PST |
Well I tend to play humans as i don't think the vast range of the 'human alien' has been fully explored yet in SF. But I would definitely have a crack at playing an alien if the motivations interested me. The +/- of game mechanics are completely irrellevent. |
28mmMan | 14 Oct 2011 10:09 a.m. PST |
"The +/- of game mechanics are completely irrelevant" We are of like minds
though I suspect we are in a small club indeed. |
billthecat | 14 Oct 2011 10:47 a.m. PST |
But nobody wants to play an amorphous blob of luminous green goo that breathes ammonia and communicates via gas excretion
.!!!
Or do they?
|
28mmMan | 14 Oct 2011 10:56 a.m. PST |
But what about the amorphous blob of luminous green (or blue) goo that breathes standard air?
|
billthecat | 14 Oct 2011 12:45 p.m. PST |
Well, that's alright then
But don't blame me when the bad guys shoot him/it first
|
billthecat | 14 Oct 2011 12:46 p.m. PST |
After Jar Jar Binks, of course. |
Mako11 | 14 Oct 2011 1:47 p.m. PST |
Yes, all rules should make Jar Jars priority targets, along with Ewoks too. Not sure which is worse. Perhaps targeting the closest ones should be best, to ensure the greater likelihood of hits. |
28mmMan | 14 Oct 2011 5:11 p.m. PST |
At least the Ewoks stayed on their planet
me'sa tinksa do E'woksa isa bunerfuls! lol |
Space Aardvark | 15 Oct 2011 1:06 p.m. PST |
If I was feilding a space pirate force, then yes I think it would be cool to mix aliens in with my force. I wouldn't for a regular army coz it would look funny on the table, but for star wars type rebels it would be perfect to mix spiecies. |
28mmMan | 15 Oct 2011 5:18 p.m. PST |
Makes sense for regular army types. How about an Alien Legion unit? There are humans and aliens together
|
28mmMan | 26 Oct 2011 9:28 p.m. PST |
How about this guy? Do anything for you?
|
tnjrp | 26 Oct 2011 9:52 p.m. PST |
That pseudo-arachind is certainly interesting (even though it's apparently from Star Wars, the second worst offender in the "lame aliens" contest after Star Trek) and would work for a low gravity world alien. I don't mind too much that alien breathes the same air or eats the same food as humans even if it is apparently a product of a very different evolutionary path on a very different world. I can suspend my disbelief on those issues. And in a pinch I'll just claim the aliens have been phenotyped or fitted with nanite life support packages so they can do that. --- As to the OP I don't think I understood the question, really. But assuming I did, a "wringly forehead alien" the same size as a human, having one head, two legs and two arms and using exactly the same tech as humans isn't my cuppa. I suppose there's no reason to assume an interesting miniature could be made for such, I have plenty of just plain ole human miniatures after all. I just would not like to treat it as an alien but rather as a phenotyped human. Now if you'll excuse me I have to go paint some of my Eldar q-:) |
infojunky | 29 Oct 2011 4:33 a.m. PST |
I just wrote on this in the Star Wars thread
. Humanoid Aliens are just different expressions of a precursor races genes in different planetary regimes
|
Space Aardvark | 29 Oct 2011 6:14 a.m. PST |
I had the idea once that all the alien races encountered are hybrids of humanoids and and the really bizarre non humans, that's why they can live in human type atmospheres etc. it would be a way for an advanced race to colonise other worlds by sending thier hybrid vassals to go where they could not. |