Help support TMP


"Is this helmet too early for 6th century Saxons?" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Dux Bellorum


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Spearmen

PhilGreg Painters in Sri Lanka paints our Teutonic spearmen.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,910 hits since 4 Jul 2011
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Field Marshal04 Jul 2011 3:14 a.m. PST

I am thinking about building some forces for the "Age of Arthur" and want to use this figure

picture

Is the helmet ok for the period though?

FM

CooperSteveOnTheLaptop04 Jul 2011 3:23 a.m. PST

looks vendel so ok to me

Field Marshal04 Jul 2011 3:24 a.m. PST

Excellent….my knowledge of this era is very little at the moment and I am voraciously reading to try to take it all in…much appreciated.

FM

gavandjosh0204 Jul 2011 3:25 a.m. PST

I'll say yep.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP04 Jul 2011 4:23 a.m. PST

That helmet looks good to me for 6th Century. I think it's based on the 7th Century Vendel finds from Sweden, but such helmets that seem inspired by Late Roman designs may have been around before the 7th.

Cardinal Hawkwood04 Jul 2011 4:33 a.m. PST

who would know?

Cardinal Ximenez04 Jul 2011 4:34 a.m. PST

People didn't upgrade they way we do now. Improvements sometimes took a while to implement as they didn't just throw stuff aside.

If you like the figure then use it. It's certainly close enough.

DM

IGWARG1 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian04 Jul 2011 6:50 a.m. PST

This helmet looks like a Late Roman officer or heavy cavalry helmet. No problem for 6th century Saxon helmet. In fact, all helmets in this photo are good for 6th century Europe.

Ten Fingered Jack04 Jul 2011 7:54 a.m. PST

Looks like a Vendel helmet from Sweden to me too.

Ten Fingered Jack04 Jul 2011 7:57 a.m. PST

The axe is too early,though.Axes weren't common weaponss in Britain until the Vikings popularized them in the 9th century AD.

Daffy Doug04 Jul 2011 8:57 a.m. PST

Oh poo. Axes have been around since the Neolithic, with handles of all sizes. A prissy chieftain, being an individual, can have a favorite weapon that isn't typical of the rank and vile.

And the helmet looks fine for that period, imho….

Roderick Robertson Fezian04 Jul 2011 9:51 a.m. PST

The helmets are fine, as already noted. From the look of it, the figure is open-handed, so you can put in anything you'd like. Personally, I'd give him a sword as first choice, spear as second.

The sword is a prestige weapon, so would be better for a commander. Spears are simply ubiquitous, while axes are rare in Saxon grave finds.

CooperSteveOnTheLaptop04 Jul 2011 10:01 a.m. PST

What goes in graves can be misleading. What people could afford to ceremonially dispose of – or saw as being a 'suitable' thing to put in a grave – may not reflect what people walk about with

aecurtis Fezian04 Jul 2011 12:04 p.m. PST

As the GB model is meant to represent the c.7th Penda of Mercia, I don't believe that the helmet is too early for the c.6th.

I'll be darned if I'm sticking the tool that I use to chop the kindling in Da's barrow. He can have his sword and spear, since he gave me my own. But he's not taking a useful utensil with him!

Not that everyone felt the same way, mind:

link

Allen

CooperSteveOnTheLaptop04 Jul 2011 1:16 p.m. PST

Swords are rare in pagan anglo-saxon graves. I'm told they equated in value to a car. Not everyone can afford to be buried with their car. A spear 'signified' a freeman. An axe may not have had any such symbolic meaning. Maybe people got buried with theirs if they'd done some notable feat with the axe.

It strikes me that the guy buried with the Pioneer helmet & weaponry was a really weedy specimen. Hardly a beefy warrior

Field Marshal04 Jul 2011 4:01 p.m. PST

Great link Allen….thank you all for your responses….fascinating period!

1815Guy09 Jul 2011 5:08 p.m. PST

Vendel eh!? I've been trying to find them. Are they still going? They did some fantastic stuff.

Cheers,

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.