Help support TMP


"Bradley and LAV's" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Return of The Brigadier

More photographs of The Brigadier and his men.


Featured Workbench Article

ZorzSERBIA Paints Hasslefree's Ken & Kendra

Two of Hasslefree's Adventurers venture to Serbia...


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


3,636 hits since 9 Apr 2011
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Incognito09 Apr 2011 6:35 p.m. PST

hey all

further to my earlier question, what USMC units use bradleys and LAV's and in what capacity do they use them in?

cheers
Bryan

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2011 7:02 p.m. PST

I dont believe any USMC units use Brads, only army. Marines use LAV's for amphib landings and as recon units on land.

Here is an idea of how they are distributed:
link
link

Irish Marine09 Apr 2011 7:09 p.m. PST

Ok the Marine Corps only has the LAV-25 and they are in Light Armored Recon Battalion. Each LAV-25 has a three man crew and carries 4 Marines as scouts. I think that there is 13 or 14 LAVs in a company.

Tgunner09 Apr 2011 7:40 p.m. PST

I've read that the USMC had Army Bradley's in support in several operations in Iraq. However the USMC has never adopted the M2/M3 AFV.

CPT Jake09 Apr 2011 7:43 p.m. PST

Army only for the Bradleys. The Bradleys in Iraq were/are Army. For example in the second battle of Falluja, 1st ID (the Big Red One) was there and had Bradleys, though often folks think of that battle as a Marine affair.

Tgunner09 Apr 2011 7:56 p.m. PST

Hey CPT Jake, someone had to bail the jarheads out eh???? 8D

It's a proven fact, if you need something done right then you HAVE to bring in the BIG RED ONE!!! Hooah!!

Mardaddy09 Apr 2011 8:51 p.m. PST

Tgunner, before you whip it out to compare, know that the Army was a part of the operation from the organizational beginning, there was no "bailing" required.

Cpt Arexu09 Apr 2011 9:26 p.m. PST

Gotta have the doggies to draw fire, don't you know…

thatguy9609 Apr 2011 9:44 p.m. PST

Marine LAVs are assigned to Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalions and are not infantry carriers. There are no USMC units with organic armored transport to my knowledge. Assault Amphibian Battalions, with the AAVP7A1 are scaled to provide such transport to Marine Regiments.

This might change if the USMC ever gets the Marine Personnel Carrier program really going, but right now the plan is for the basic setup to remain the same. The MPC would be integrated into battalions with the replacement for the AAVP7A1 (whatever this ends up being called with the cancellation of the EFV).

Cerberus031109 Apr 2011 11:08 p.m. PST
Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP10 Apr 2011 4:27 a.m. PST

"I've read that the USMC had Army Bradley's in support in several operations in Iraq. However the USMC has never adopted the M2/M3 AFV."

Yes, I read same. Was in Ramadi and Falujah I believe:
link

Tgunner10 Apr 2011 4:49 a.m. PST

Oh, I know. Sorry Mardaddy, being an old BRO I couldn't resist the dig.

The Corps needed more battalions to cover the fight. I seem to remember that there one battalion from the 1st ID in the fight ('new' 3d Brigade guys). It was pretty cool to see GIs from the BRO serve with the 7th RCT.

But more importantly for the division, the Fallujah campaign might see the division's first Congressional Metal of Honor since Vietnam (?). Staff Sergeant David Bellavia was recommended for both the CMH AND the DSC for his actions in the battle.

That was another fascinating chapter in the story of the 2d Infantry. These guys have been around:

link

Aapsych2010 Apr 2011 6:39 a.m. PST

Is the M2/M3 Bradley vehicle seris running gear based on that of the LVTP-7 (AAVP-7), a Marine amphibious transport?

thatguy9610 Apr 2011 7:55 a.m. PST

I believe its the other way around, that as part of the AAVP7A1 upgrades, a level of commonality between the two vehicles was achieved.

Lion in the Stars10 Apr 2011 8:53 p.m. PST

I think the chassis is different from the AAV7, but the recent "Rebuild to Standard" program changed the engine to the same one as in the Bradleys for better performance.

thatguy9610 Apr 2011 9:11 p.m. PST

The Reliability, Availability, Maintainability/Rebuild to Standard (RAM/RS) upgrades also replaced suspension components on the AAV7 series with modified components from the M2/M3 Bradley series.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.