Mycenius | 24 Jan 2011 2:43 a.m. PST |
Some people may or may not be aware of this, that the above book was originally a published Magazine Series in Meccano Magazine prior to going into book format, Some may also be aware the magazine series has additional material not in the book, and some may or may not know that Meccano Magazine have nearly 100 years of publications on the web and free to download. So if you have been looking for a copy of "Battle", or want to see the extra 'chapters', or are just into those classic Don Featherstone/Peter Young/Charles Grant era publications – I've posted the detail about its availability at Meccano on my blog at: link So if it interests you and you weren't aware of the above – Enjoy! :-) |
NigelM | 24 Jan 2011 2:59 a.m. PST |
Have a copy of Battle and love it. Play the odd game from time to time still and re-read it regularly. Never knew there were extra parts published in the magazine so thanks for pointing that out. |
Company D Miniatures | 24 Jan 2011 3:13 a.m. PST |
Thank you – I love this era of wargaming. |
Mycenius | 24 Jan 2011 3:23 a.m. PST |
Have a copy of Battle and love it. Play the odd game from time to time still and re-read it regularly. Never knew there were extra parts published in the magazine so thanks for pointing that out. No worries – I think the book must have been published to a deadline so just got what was written up to the point it was due for final editing (i.e. around July-August 1970 approx) – and the extra sections on Terrain, Maps, and the Back Yard Game just weren't included. And I love the final part (XXXII) where he gets the old 1/32nd stuff out in the back yard amongst the grass & rockery! He' must've been 40+ (or more) years old at the time! :-) |
Richard Baber | 24 Jan 2011 3:27 a.m. PST |
Thanks John As you well know these are my rules of choice and have been for over 30yrs (with tweeks and changes I admit). Lots of good reading :-) |
Martin Rapier | 24 Jan 2011 3:59 a.m. PST |
That is great, thanks. I never saw it in Meccano Magazine, but I did have to re-buy 'Battle' a few years ago after my original copy went astray. I always thought the book was bit dis-jointed in parts! |
altfritz | 24 Jan 2011 4:25 a.m. PST |
I wish the book had additional vehicle stats – one can make them up, of course – but they would have made it more complete to have Shermans, etc. |
Marc the plastics fan | 24 Jan 2011 5:08 a.m. PST |
Fantatsic link – thanks for sharing, that was really appreciated. |
daghan | 24 Jan 2011 6:33 a.m. PST |
Altfritz: If you go to the Old School Wargaming Yahoo group; then go to the Files section; find the File labelled "Grant's Battle"; look at the last few pages of the last PDF in there, you'll find stats for Shermans and a lot else besides. There used to be a website called Battle Game (nothing to do with Henry)put up by someone called Fraser, who had a lot of extra stuff relating to Grant's "Battle". The items at OSW are just part of it. |
Frederick | 24 Jan 2011 7:16 a.m. PST |
Great stuff – reminds me of my early days with the Airfix Germans and Brits going at each others, using this very set of rules – the picture of the Panzerscheck gunner at the "Battle of Twin Farms" is very nostalgic! Many thanks for posting |
Martin Rapier | 24 Jan 2011 7:29 a.m. PST |
"you'll find stats for Shermans and a lot else besides." At the time I just rated Shermans the same as Panzer IVs. |
Old Smokie | 24 Jan 2011 7:44 a.m. PST |
thanks for a great resource |
Mycenius | 24 Jan 2011 1:35 p.m. PST |
No worries Guys – One of the OSW guys has compiled all the articles into a single PDF, and also all Charles Grant's "Militaria" review column articles too. I've updated my blog post with the details: link Enjoy. |
(Stolen Name) | 24 Jan 2011 2:27 p.m. PST |
Fantatic thanks – this was my first ever introduction to 'proper' wargaming. Fond memeories! |
altfritz | 24 Jan 2011 5:11 p.m. PST |
Thanks for the tip, charla! It's funny but sometimes I think the closest thing to Battle nowadays is FOW. I think it's b/c in Battle you had supporting units like Artillery. I can't remember if Grant accommodated Off Board stuff, but I'm pretty sure FOW doesn't understand the concept. |
pnguyenho | 24 Jan 2011 8:02 p.m. PST |
Thanks for the link. I actually reread the "Recon" AAR yesterday in my well-worn book. "Battle!" was the first war-games book I read that got me hooked on the hobby in 1984. I was thinking of playing a skirmish game using the rules. |
Grand Duke Natokina | 24 Jan 2011 8:37 p.m. PST |
I have his book on Horse and Musket Warfare. I never knew he did one n modern battle. Weaselhoffen. |
Mycenius | 24 Jan 2011 9:20 p.m. PST |
I have his book on Horse and Musket Warfare. I never knew he did one n modern battle. He did several – the original fantastic inspiring one was "The War Game" for 18th Century Frederick The Great era, then he subsequently did "The Napoleonic Wargame" (self explanatory) and "Battle" (for WW2 and early Moderns era) – in addition to his various work on campaign and scenario books, magazine series (like Table Top Teasers), and more. There's a full bibliography of his books in PDF form at the Old School Wargaming Yahoo!Group. :-) |
Derek H | 25 Jan 2011 1:07 a.m. PST |
Happy memories, but not a very good game by modern standards. Played it once last year and enjoyed it a lot as a piece of nostalgia. Won't be playing again in a hurry. |
Marc the plastics fan | 25 Jan 2011 2:47 a.m. PST |
DH – remember that CG was always focussed on the game. I find it a great introductory game for kids and newbies. It lacks the refinements of modern rules, but it is fun. |
Martin Rapier | 25 Jan 2011 9:41 a.m. PST |
"I have his book on Horse and Musket Warfare" I, ahem, have a signed copy of his Napoleonic one. I ws also fortunate enough to lay hands on the actual model houses used in the photographs in 'Battle' when CS Grant brought them to Partisan a few years back. I'm such a groupie. |
mashrewba | 25 Jan 2011 9:46 a.m. PST |
Brilliant -while browsing this I found CGs review of the original WRG Ancients – "at times they seem to verge on the over complex" -surely not!!!! nzmeccano.com/MMviewer.php I still have my treasured copy!!! |
Littlearmies | 26 Jan 2011 1:39 p.m. PST |
Thank you very much Mycenius – this was my first introduction to wargaming when I came across a copy in my local library. This plus some house rules was a source of great pleasure for several years (I bought a copy of the book – I did return the library copy!). |
Tiberius | 27 Jan 2011 4:22 a.m. PST |
thank you. great memories. |
vonLoudon | 14 Mar 2011 7:19 a.m. PST |
Battle rules also appeared in Miniature Wargaming 170 with additions from Jim Webster. There are many tables and vehicle strike values. Rolling for a strike value has always sounded more fun to me than automatic effects. |
Hrldplmr | 16 Mar 2011 3:17 a.m. PST |
Great stuff! I still remember finding my first Battle article in the Meccano magazines at the Remuera public library in Auckland when my mum took me up there one cold winter's night! IIRC some folks at the Society of Twentieth Century Wargames have been expanding upon Battle over the years. |
Thomas Thomas | 16 Mar 2011 1:08 p.m. PST |
What memories. This was my introduction to miniature wargaming. I've been gaming 20mm WWII ever since. TomT |
SoloGeneral | 18 Jun 2011 9:32 a.m. PST |
Fantastic stuff – love the days when plastic soldiers were real plastic soldiers and a tank was just a tank!!! Where did it all go wrong? |
Russell Phillips | 21 Jun 2011 4:18 a.m. PST |
Thanks for this. I still have the copy of the book that I was given when I was a kid – it was my introduction to wargaming. I hadn't realised that it started out as a series of articles. Russ |
Canuckistan Commander | 01 Sep 2011 12:08 p.m. PST |
Battle Game Yahoo Group is still up and running. |
Maxshadow | 17 Oct 2011 6:13 a.m. PST |
John. Thanks for posting this. I still have my copy. Has anyone seen/played his Napoleonic rules? I wondering if they were full of simple enjoyment like his WW2 set. |
Marc the plastics fan | 17 Oct 2011 8:38 a.m. PST |
|
Maxshadow | 18 Oct 2011 5:41 a.m. PST |
Ha ha! Thanks Marc. Thats a good enough review for me. |
Marc the plastics fan | 18 Oct 2011 6:28 a.m. PST |
Sorry, should not mess around like that really. What I felt was they were more typical of the 70's than the 60's, so lots of tables, factors and assorted guff. Which the WW2 set did have, but less of, and cleaner. I boughtthem hoping for a "fun" set, but they did not match that expectation. Worse, I found out that the current Grant Naps rules are based on them, but are a development., so the set I bought have not had the benefit of being "streamlined" over the years. Shame really, as I like the simplicity of the early Grant rules. |
Maxshadow | 19 Oct 2011 5:35 a.m. PST |
"current Grant Naps"? I don't think I've ever heard of them. |
20thmaine | 29 Oct 2011 1:59 p.m. PST |
Like the link to his Militaria column – especially the first one that starts along the lines "whoop boys we're really living in the golden age of gaming, it's not like the bad old days, you can get EVERYTHING now" Dated : August 1968 ! |
Marc the plastics fan | 09 Jun 2024 12:56 p.m. PST |
Zombie thread alert With the demise of yahoo groups does anybody have a link to the extended charts/data mentioned above please? |
Old Contemptible | 09 Jun 2024 3:25 p.m. PST |
Thanks for posting the link. |